Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carlo Muscas

dblp:48/8916 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0553-5875ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 70% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
parameter estimation
0.812024
Learning Power Flow Models and Constraints From Time-Synchronized Measurements: A Review · Proc. IEEE 2024
Energy systems and smart grids
power system modeling
0.812024
Learning Power Flow Models and Constraints From Time-Synchronized Measurements: A Review · Proc. IEEE 2024
Energy systems and smart grids › power system monitoring
power system state estimation
0.812024
Learning Power Flow Models and Constraints From Time-Synchronized Measurements: A Review · Proc. IEEE 2024
Energy systems and smart grids
power system monitoring
0.212024
Learning Power Flow Models and Constraints From Time-Synchronized Measurements: A Review · Proc. IEEE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-synchronized measurement · 0.8linearized power flow approximation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Learning Power Flow Models and Constraints From Time-Synchronized Measurements: A Review
abstract
Key operational and protection functions of power systems (e.g., optimal power flow scheduling and control, state estimation (SE), protection, and fault location) rely on the availability of models to represent the system’s behavior under different operating conditions. Power system models require knowledge of the components’ electrical parameters and the system topology. However, these data may be inaccurate for several reasons (e.g., inaccurate information of components datasheets and/or outdated topological information). The deployment of time synchronization in phasor measurement units (PMUs) and remote terminal units (RTUs) enables the collection of large datasets of synchronized measurements to infer power system models and learn associated power flow constraints. Within this context, this article presents a comprehensive review of measurement-based estimation methods for power flow models using time-synchronized measurements. It begins by exploring advancements in time dissemination technologies and the characterization of uncertainties in PMUs and instrument transformers (ITs), along with their implications for parameter estimation. This article then examines the power system parameter estimation problem, highlighting key techniques and methodologies. In the following, this article focuses on measurement models for state-independent power flow model estimation, including line parameters, admittance matrices, topology, and joint state-parameter estimation. Finally, this article discusses recent approaches for estimating state-dependent power flow models, with particular reference to linearized power flow approximations because of their large use in control applications.
Rahul Kumar Gupta, Paolo Attilio Pegoraro, Ognjen Stanojev, Ali Abur, Carlo Muscas, Gabriela Hug, Mario Paolone
Proc. IEEE5