Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yin-Wen Chang
dblp:48/9362
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Language models and text generation · 36% Deep learning architectures and training · 29% Machine translation · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Computational complexity · 50% Mathematical optimization · 36% Coding theory · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | A Simple and Effective Positional Encoding for Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2021 O(n) Connections are Expressive Enough: Universal Approximability of Sparse Transformers · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical pattern recognition
bayes optimal classifier |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Better autoregressive regression with LLMs via regression-aware fine-tuning · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Better autoregressive regression with LLMs via regression-aware fine-tuning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
positional encoding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Simple and Effective Positional Encoding for Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
pre-training objectives |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Pre-training Tasks for Embedding-based Large-scale Retrieval · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
sparse attention |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | O(n) Connections are Expressive Enough: Universal Approximability of Sparse Transformers · NeurIPS 2020 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
embedding-based retrieval |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Pre-training Tasks for Embedding-based Large-scale Retrieval · ICLR 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
phrase-based decoding |
0.4 | 2 | 2017 | Source-Side Left-to-Right or Target-Side Left-to-Right? An Empirical Comparison of Two Phrase-Based Decoding Algorithms · EMNLP 2017 Exact Decoding of Phrase-Based Translation Models through Lagrangian Relaxation · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation |
0.4 | 2 | 2017 | Source-Side Left-to-Right or Target-Side Left-to-Right? An Empirical Comparison of Two Phrase-Based Decoding Algorithms · EMNLP 2017 Exact Decoding of Phrase-Based Translation Models through Lagrangian Relaxation · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A Constrained Viterbi Relaxation for Bidirectional Word Alignment · ACL (1) 2014 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A Constrained Viterbi Relaxation for Bidirectional Word Alignment · ACL (1) 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
beam search |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Optimal Beam Search for Machine Translation · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Optimal Beam Search for Machine Translation · EMNLP 2013 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
lagrangian relaxation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Optimal Beam Search for Machine Translation · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
language model pretraining |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | A Simple and Effective Positional Encoding for Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
exact decoding |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Exact Decoding of Phrase-Based Translation Models through Lagrangian Relaxation · EMNLP 2011 |
Mathematical optimization
lagrangian relaxation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Exact Decoding of Phrase-Based Translation Models through Lagrangian Relaxation · EMNLP 2011 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Training and Testing Low-degree Polynomial Data Mappings via Linear SVM · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Training and Testing Low-degree Polynomial Data Mappings via Linear SVM · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regression-aware fine-tuning · 0.9cross-entropy loss · 0.9autoregressive sampling · 0.9pre-training · 0.9embedding · 0.9decoupled positional attention · 0.5lagrangian relaxation · 0.4constraint relaxation · 0.4coarse-to-fine pruning · 0.4empirical comparison · 0.3viterbi algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Better autoregressive regression with LLMs via regression-aware fine-tuningabstractDecoder-based large language models (LLMs) have proven highly versatile, with remarkable successes even on problems ostensibly removed from traditional language generation. One such example is solving regression problems, where the targets are real numbers rather than textual tokens. A common approach to use LLMs on such problems is to perform fine-tuning based on the cross-entropy loss, and use autoregressive sampling at inference time. Another approach relies on fine-tuning a separate predictive head with a suitable loss such as squared error. While each approach has had success, there has been limited study on principled ways of using decoder LLMs for regression. In this work, we compare different prior works under a unified view, and introduce regression-aware fine-tuning(RAFT), a novel approach based on the Bayes-optimal decision rule. We demonstrate how RAFT improves over established baselines on several benchmarks and model families. Michal Lukasik, Harikrishna Narasimhan, Yin-Wen Chang, Aditya Krishna Menon, Felix Yu, Sanjiv Kumar |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2021 | A Simple and Effective Positional Encoding for TransformersabstractTransformer models are permutation equivariant.To supply the order and type information of the input tokens, position and segment embeddings are usually added to the input.Recent works proposed variations of positional encodings with relative position encodings achieving better performance.Our analysis shows that the gain actually comes from moving positional information to attention layer from the input.Motivated by this, we introduce Decoupled posItional attEntion for Transformers (DIET), a simple yet effective mechanism to encode position and segment information into the Transformer models.The proposed method has faster training and inference time, while achieving competitive performance on GLUE, XTREME and WMT benchmarks.We further generalize our method to long-range transformers and show performance gain. Pu-Chin Chen, Henry Tsai, Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Hyung Won Chung, Yin-Wen Chang, Chun-Sung Ferng |
EMNLP (1) | 5 |
| 2020 | Pre-training Tasks for Embedding-based Large-scale Retrieval
Wei-Cheng Chang, Felix X. Yu, Yin-Wen Chang, Yiming Yang 0002, Sanjiv Kumar |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2020 | O(n) Connections are Expressive Enough: Universal Approximability of Sparse TransformersabstractRecently, Transformer networks have redefined the state of the art in many NLP tasks. However, these models suffer from quadratic computational cost in the input sequence length $n$ to compute pairwise attention in each layer. This has prompted recent research into sparse Transformers that sparsify the connections in the attention layers. While empirically promising for long sequences, fundamental questions remain unanswered: Can sparse Transformers approximate any arbitrary sequence-to-sequence function, similar to their dense counterparts? How does the sparsity pattern and the sparsity level affect their performance? In this paper, we address these questions and provide a unifying framework that captures existing sparse attention models. We propose sufficient conditions under which we prove that a sparse attention model can universally approximate any sequence-to-sequence function. Surprisingly, our results show that sparse Transformers with only $O(n)$ connections per attention layer can approximate the same function class as the dense model with $n^2$ connections. Lastly, we present experiments comparing different patterns/levels of sparsity on standard NLP tasks. Chulhee Yun, Yin-Wen Chang, Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Ankit Singh Rawat, Sashank J. Reddi, Sanjiv Kumar |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Source-Side Left-to-Right or Target-Side Left-to-Right? An Empirical Comparison of Two Phrase-Based Decoding AlgorithmsabstractThis paper describes an empirical study of the phrase-based decoding algorithm proposed by Chang and Collins (2017). The algorithm produces a translation by processing the source-language sentence in strictly left-to-right order, differing from commonly used approaches that build the target-language sentence in left-to-right order. Our results show that the new algorithm is competitive with Moses (Koehn et al., 2007) in terms of both speed and BLEU scores. Yin-Wen Chang, Michael Collins 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2017 | A Polynomial-Time Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Phrase-Based Decoding with a Fixed Distortion LimitabstractDecoding of phrase-based translation models in the general case is known to be NP-complete, by a reduction from the traveling salesman problem (Knight, 1999). In practice, phrase-based systems often impose a hard distortion limit that limits the movement of phrases during translation. However, the impact on complexity after imposing such a constraint is not well studied. In this paper, we describe a dynamic programming algorithm for phrase-based decoding with a fixed distortion limit. The runtime of the algorithm is O( nd! lh d+1) where n is the sentence length, d is the distortion limit, l is a bound on the number of phrases starting at any position in the sentence, and h is related to the maximum number of target language translations for any source word. The algorithm makes use of a novel representation that gives a new perspective on decoding of phrase-based models. Yin-Wen Chang, Michael Collins 0001 |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2014 | A Constrained Viterbi Relaxation for Bidirectional Word AlignmentabstractBidirectional models of word alignment are an appealing alternative to post-hoc combinations of directional word aligners.Unfortunately, most bidirectional formulations are NP-Hard to solve, and a previous attempt to use a relaxationbased decoder yielded few exact solutions (6%).We present a novel relaxation for decoding the bidirectional model of DeNero and Macherey (2011).The relaxation can be solved with a modified version of the Viterbi algorithm.To find optimal solutions on difficult instances, we alternate between incrementally adding constraints and applying optimality-preserving coarse-to-fine pruning.The algorithm finds provably exact solutions on 86% of sentence pairs and shows improvements over directional models. Yin-Wen Chang, Alexander M. Rush, John DeNero, Michael Collins 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2013 | Optimal Beam Search for Machine TranslationabstractBeam search is a fast and empirically effective method for translation decoding, but it lacks formal guarantees about search error.We develop a new decoding algorithm that combines the speed of beam search with the optimal certificate property of Lagrangian relaxation, and apply it to phrase-and syntax-based translation decoding.The new method is efficient, utilizes standard MT algorithms, and returns an exact solution on the majority of translation examples in our test data.The algorithm is 3.5 times faster than an optimized incremental constraint-based decoder for phrase-based translation and 4 times faster for syntax-based translation. Alexander M. Rush, Yin-Wen Chang, Michael Collins 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2011 | Exact Decoding of Phrase-Based Translation Models through Lagrangian Relaxation
Yin-Wen Chang, Michael Collins 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | Training and Testing Low-degree Polynomial Data Mappings via Linear SVM
Yin-Wen Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Michael Ringgaard, Chih-Jen Lin |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |