Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mary Manhein

dblp:49/10771 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › shape matching
fragment reassembly
0.212015
3D Fragment Reassembly Using Integrated Template Guidance and Fracture-Region Matching · ICCV 2015
Geometric modeling and processing
shape matching
0.212015
3D Fragment Reassembly Using Integrated Template Guidance and Fracture-Region Matching · ICCV 2015
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › shape completion
symmetry-based shape completion
0.112011
An automatic assembly and completion framework for fragmented skulls · ICCV 2011
Computational social science and digital humanities
archaeology
0.112015
3D Fragment Reassembly Using Integrated Template Guidance and Fracture-Region Matching · ICCV 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

template guidance · 0.4groupwise matching · 0.4fracture-region matching · 0.4spin-image descriptor · 0.1global optimization · 0.1ICP-like template matching · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 3D Fragment Reassembly Using Integrated Template Guidance and Fracture-Region Matching
abstract
This paper studies matching of fragmented objects to recompose their original geometry. Solving this geometric reassembly problem has direct applications in archaeology and forensic investigation in the computer-aided restoration of damaged artifacts and evidence. We develop a new algorithm to effectively integrate both guidance from a template and from matching of adjacent pieces' fracture-regions. First, we compute partial matchings between fragments and a template, and pairwise matchings among fragments. Many potential matches are obtained and then selected/refined in a multi-piece matching stage to maximize global groupwise matching consistency. This pipeline is effective in composing fragmented thin-shell objects containing small pieces, whose pairwise matching is usually unreliable and ambiguous and hence their reassembly remains challenging to the existing algorithms.
Kang Zhang 0002, Wuyi Yu, Mary Manhein, Warren N. Waggenspack, Xin Li 0003
ICCV3
2011 An automatic assembly and completion framework for fragmented skulls
abstract
We develop a completion pipeline for fragmented and damaged skulls. The goal of this work is to convert scanned incomplete skull fragments to a complete skull model for subsequent forensic or archeological tasks such as facial reconstruction. The proposed assembly and completion algorithms can also be used to repair other fragmented objects with inherent symmetry. A two-step assembly framework is proposed: (1) rough assembly by an ICP-like template matching algorithm integrated with the slippage features and spin-image descriptors; (2) assembly refinement by a global optimization on least square transformation error (LSTE) of break-curves. The assembled skull is finally repaired by a symmetry-based completion algorithm. Experiments on repairing scanned skull fragments demonstrate the efficacy and robustness of this framework.
Zhao Yin, Mary Manhein, Xin Li 0003
ICCV3