Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Howard Barnum

dblp:49/2176 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0003-2336-6147ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 42% Quantum computing and quantum information · 34% Mathematical optimization · 18%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 67% Authentication and access control · 33%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › query complexity › quantum query complexity
adversary method
0.012003
Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.012003
Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003
Computational complexity › query complexity
quantum query complexity
0.012003
Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003
Mathematical optimization › semidefinite programming
semidefinite programming formulation
0.012003
Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003
Authentication and access control › authentication
quantum authentication
0.012002
Authentication of Quantum Messages · FOCS 2002
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
quantum cryptography
0.012002
Authentication of Quantum Messages · FOCS 2002
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › quantum cryptography
quantum encryption
0.012002
Authentication of Quantum Messages · FOCS 2002
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum channel capacity
0.012000
On quantum fidelities and channel capacities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2000
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum error correction
quantum code
0.012000
On quantum fidelities and channel capacities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2000
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum information theory
0.012000
On quantum fidelities and channel capacities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2000
Computational geometry › geometric transformation
duality
0.012003
Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.012003
Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming · CCC 2003
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum entanglement
EPR pairs
0.012002
Authentication of Quantum Messages · FOCS 2002
Information theory
channel capacity
0.012000
On quantum fidelities and channel capacities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2000
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum channel capacity
classical capacity
0.012000
On quantum fidelities and channel capacities · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantum information theory · 0.1lower bound · 0.1semidefinite programming · 0.0positive semidefinite matrices · 0.0duality · 0.0fidelity analysis · 0.0encoding restrictions · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Nonclassicality without entanglement enables bit commitment
abstract
We investigate the existence of secure bit commitment protocols in the convex framework for probabilistic theories. The theory makes only minimal assumptions, and can be used to formalize quantum theory, classical probability theory, and a host of other possibilities. We prove that in all such theories that are locally non-classical but do not have entanglement, there exists a bit commitment protocol that is exponentially secure in the number of systems used.
Howard Barnum, Oscar C. O. Dahlsten, Matthew Leifer, Ben Toner
ITW1
2004 A lower bound on the quantum query complexity of read-once functions
Howard Barnum, Michael E. Saks
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
2003 Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming
abstract
We reformulate quantum query complexity in terms of inequalities and equations for a set of positive semidefinite matrices. Using the new formulation we: 1) show that the workspace of a quantum computer can be limited to at most n+k qubits (where n and k are the number of input and output bits respectively) without reducing the computational power of the model; 2) give an algorithm that on input the truth table of a partial Boolean function and an integer t runs in time polynomial in the size of the truth table and estimates, to any desired accuracy, the minimum probability of error that can be attained by a quantum query algorithm attempts to evaluate f in t queries; 3) use semidefinite programming duality to formulate a dual SDP P/spl circ/(f, t, /spl epsi/) that is feasible if and only if f cannot be evaluated within error /spl epsi/ by a t-step quantum query algorithm. Using this SDP, we derive a general lower bound for quantum query complexity that encompasses a lower bound method of Ambainis and its generalizations; 4) give an interpretation of a generalized form of branching in quantum computation.
Howard Barnum, Michael E. Saks, Mario Szegedy
CCC1
2002 Authentication of Quantum Messages
abstract
Authentication is a well-studied area of classical cryptography: a sender A and a receiver B sharing a classical secret key want to exchange a classical message with the guarantee that the message has not been modified or replaced by a dishonest party with control of the communication line. In this paper we study the authentication of messages composed of quantum states. We give a formal definition of authentication in the quantum setting. Assuming A and B have access to an insecure quantum channel and share a secret, classical random key, we provide a non-interactive scheme that enables A to both encrypt and authenticate an m qubit message by encoding it into m+s qubits, where the error probability decreases exponentially in the security parameter s. The scheme requires a secret key of size 2m+O(s). To achieve this, we give a highly efficient protocol for testing the purity of shared EPR pairs. It has long been known that learning information about a general quantum state will necessarily disturb it. We refine this result to show that such a disturbance can be done with few side effects, allowing it to circumvent cryptographic protections. Consequently, any scheme to authenticate quantum messages must also encrypt them. In contrast, no such constraint exists classically. This reasoning has two important consequences: It allows us to give a lower bound of 2m key bits for authenticating m qubits, which makes our protocol asymptotically optimal. Moreover, we use it to show that digitally signing quantum states is impossible.
Howard Barnum, Claude Crépeau, Daniel Gottesman, Adam D. Smith 0001, Alain Tapp
FOCS1
2000 On quantum fidelities and channel capacities
abstract
For the discrete memoryless quantum channel, we show the equivalence of two different notions of quantum channel capacity: that which uses the entanglement fidelity as its criterion for success in transmission, and that which uses the minimum fidelity of pure states in a subspace of the input Hilbert space as its criterion. As a corollary, any source with entropy rate less than the capacity may be transmitted with high entanglement fidelity. We also show that a restricted class of encodings is sufficient to transmit any quantum source which may be transmitted on a given channel. This enables us to simplify a known upper bound for the channel capacity. It also enables us to show that the availability of an auxiliary classical channel from encoder to decoder does not increase the quantum capacity.
Howard Barnum, Emanuel Knill, Michael Nielsen 0002
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1999 Finding a better-than-classical quantum AND/OR algorithm using genetic programming
abstract
This paper documents the discovery of a new, better-than-classical quantum algorithm for the depth-two AND/OR tree problem. We describe the genetic programming system that was constructed specifically for this work, the quantum computer simulator that is used to evaluate the fitness of evolving quantum algorithms, and the newly discovered algorithm.
Lee Spector, Howard Barnum, Herbert J. Bernstein, Nikhil Swamy
CEC2