Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jon Edvardsson
dblp:49/2569
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 87% Program analysis · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › test generation
constraint-based test generation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Analysis of the constraint solver in UNA based test data generation · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2001 |
Software testing
test input generation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Analysis of the constraint solver in UNA based test data generation · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2001 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Analysis of the constraint solver in UNA based test data generation · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2001 |
Mathematical optimization › linear programming
simplex method |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Analysis of the constraint solver in UNA based test data generation · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unified numerical approach · 0.1simplex method · 0.1cutting-plane algorithm · 0.1branch-and-bound · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Analysis of the constraint solver in UNA based test data generationabstractIn a series of articles Gupta et al. develop a framework for automatic test data generation for computer programs. In general, their approach consists of a branch predicate collector, which derives a system of linear inequalities representing the branch predicates for a given path in the program. This system is solved using a solving technique of theirs called the Unified Numerical Approach (UNA) [5, 7]. In this paper we show that in contrast to traditional optimization methods the UNA is not bounded by the size of the solved system. Instead it depends on how input is composed. That is, even for very simple systems consisting of one variable we can easily get more than a thousand iterations. We will also give a formal proof that UNA does not always find a mixed integer solution when there is one. Finally, we suggest using some traditional optimization method instead, like the simplex method in combination with branch-and-bound and/or a cutting-plane algorithm as a constraint solver. Jon Edvardsson, Mariam Kamkar |
ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |