Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philipp A. Schoeller

dblp:49/2870 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
cyclic codes
0.011991
on repeated-root cyclic codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1991
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › cyclic codes
repeated-root cyclic code
0.011991
on repeated-root cyclic codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hasse derivative · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 on repeated-root cyclic codes
abstract
A parity-check matrix for a q-ary repeated-root cyclic code is derived using the Hasse derivative. Then the minimum distance of a q-ary repeated-root cyclic code is expressed in terms of the minimum distance of a certain simple-root cyclic code. With the help of this result, several binary repeated-root cyclic codes of lengths up to n=62 are shown to contain the largest known number of codewords for their given length and minimum distance. The relative minimum distance d/sub min//n of q-ary repeated-root cyclic codes of rate r>or=R is proven to tend to zero as the largest multiplicity of a root of the generator g(x) increases to infinity. It is further shown that repeated-root cycle codes cannot be asymptotically better than simple-root cyclic codes.>
Guy Castagnoli, James L. Massey, Philipp A. Schoeller, Niklaus von Seemann
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3