Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Naoki Isu

dblp:49/3487 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › error detection
grammatical error detection
0.112006
A Feedback-Augmented Method for Detecting Errors in the Writing of Learners of English · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics
0.112006
Reinforcing English Countability Prediction with One Countability per Discourse Property · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation
0.112006
Reinforcing English Countability Prediction with One Countability per Discourse Property · ACL 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mass-count distinction · 0.1feedback augmentation · 0.1decision list learning · 0.1reinforcement learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A Feedback-Augmented Method for Detecting Errors in the Writing of Learners of English
abstract
This paper proposes a method for detecting errors in article usage and singular plural usage based on the mass count distinction. First, it learns decision lists from training data generated automatically to distinguish mass and count nouns. Then, in order to improve its performance, it is augmented by feedback that is obtained from the writing of learners. Finally, it detects errors by applying rules to the mass count distinction. Experiments show that it achieves a recall of 0.71 and a precision of 0.72 and outperforms other methods used for comparison when augmented by feedback.
Ryo Nagata, Atsuo Kawai, Koichiro Morihiro, Naoki Isu
ACL4
2006 Reinforcing English Countability Prediction with One Countability per Discourse Property
Ryo Nagata, Atsuo Kawai, Koichiro Morihiro, Naoki Isu
ACL4
2005 Detecting Article Errors Based on the Mass Count Distinction
Ryo Nagata, Takahiro Wakana, Fumito Masui, Atsuo Kawai, Naoki Isu
IJCNLP5