VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elizaveta Levina
dblp:49/4503
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 58% Graph learning · 30% Learning theory · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 98% Information theory · 2% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | Community models for networks observed through edge nominations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 High-dimensional Gaussian graphical models on network-linked data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
statistical network models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Latent Process Models for Functional Network Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
stochastic block model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Community models for networks observed through edge nominations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
community detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Community models for networks observed through edge nominations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Data mining
network analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Community models for networks observed through edge nominations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph signal processing
graph denoising |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Recovering shared structure from multiple networks with unknown edge distributions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
gaussian graphical model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | High-dimensional Gaussian graphical models on network-linked data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
high-dimensional estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | High-dimensional Gaussian graphical models on network-linked data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
gradient descent |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Latent Process Models for Functional Network Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Data mining › sampling
network sampling |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Community models for networks observed through edge nominations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
brain network analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Recovering shared structure from multiple networks with unknown edge distributions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › intrinsic dimension
intrinsic dimension estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Intrinsic Dimension · NIPS 2004 |
Image and video processing
earth mover's distance |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | The Earth Mover's Distance is the Mallows Distance: Some Insights from Statistics · ICCV 2001 |
Image and video processing
image similarity |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | The Earth Mover's Distance is the Mallows Distance: Some Insights from Statistics · ICCV 2001 |
Information theory › probability theory
probability metrics |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | The Earth Mover's Distance is the Mallows Distance: Some Insights from Statistics · ICCV 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient descent · 1.7functional basis representation · 1.7random weighted adjacency matrix · 1.7finite-sample concentration inequality · 1.7spectral clustering · 1.3method of moments · 1.3maximum likelihood estimation · 0.5inverse covariance estimation · 0.4statistical estimation · 0.1poisson process approximation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Latent Process Models for Functional Network DataabstractNetwork data are often sampled with auxiliary information or collected through the observation of a complex system over time, leading to multiple network snapshots indexed by a continuous variable. Many methods in statistical network analysis are traditionally designed for a single network, and can be applied to an aggregated network in this setting, but that approach can miss important functional structure. Here we develop an approach to estimating the expected network explicitly as a function of a continuous index, be it time or another indexing variable. We parameterize the network expectation through low dimensional latent processes, whose components we represent with a fixed, finite-dimensional functional basis. We derive a gradient descent estimation algorithm, establish theoretical guarantees for recovery of the low dimensional structure, compare our method to competitors, and apply it to a data set of international political interactions over time, showing our proposed method to adapt well to data, outperform competitors, and provide interpretable and meaningful results. Peter W. MacDonald, Elizaveta Levina, Ji Zhu 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | Community models for networks observed through edge nominationsabstractCommunities are a common and widely studied structure in networks, typically assuming that the network is fully and correctly observed. In practice, network data are often collected by querying nodes about their connections. In some settings, all edges of a sampled node will be recorded, and in others, a node may be asked to name its connections. These sampling mechanisms introduce noise and bias, which can obscure the community structure and invalidate assumptions underlying standard community detection methods. We propose a general model for a class of network sampling mechanisms based on recording edges via querying nodes, designed to improve community detection for network data collected in this fashion. We model edge sampling probabilities as a function of both individual preferences and community parameters, and show community detection can be performed by spectral clustering under this general class of models. We also propose, as a special case of the general framework, a parametric model for directed networks we call the nomination stochastic block model, which allows for meaningful parameter interpretations and can be fitted by the method of moments. In this case, spectral clustering and the method of moments are computationally efficient and come with theoretical guarantees of consistency. We evaluate the proposed model in simulation studies on unweighted and weighted networks and under misspecified models. The method is applied to a faculty hiring dataset, discovering a meaningful hierarchy of communities among US business schools. Tianxi Li, Elizaveta Levina, Ji Zhu 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2022 | Recovering shared structure from multiple networks with unknown edge distributionsabstractIn increasingly many settings, data sets consist of multiple samples from a population of networks, with vertices aligned across networks; for example, brain connectivity networks in neuroscience. We consider the setting where the observed networks have a shared expectation, but may differ in the noise structure on their edges. Our approach exploits the shared mean structure to denoise edge-level measurements of the observed networks and estimate the underlying population-level parameters. We also explore the extent to which edge-level errors influence estimation and downstream inference. In the process, we establish a finite-sample concentration inequality for the low-rank eigenvalue truncation of a random weighted adjacency matrix, which may be of independent interest. The proposed approach is illustrated on synthetic networks and on data from an fMRI study of schizophrenia. Keith D. Levin, Asad Lodhia, Elizaveta Levina |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2020 | High-dimensional Gaussian graphical models on network-linked dataabstractGraphical models are commonly used to represent conditional dependence relationships between variables. There are multiple methods available for exploring them from high-dimensional data, but almost all of them rely on the assumption that the observations are independent and identically distributed. At the same time, observations connected by a network are becoming increasingly common, and tend to violate these assumptions. Here we develop a Gaussian graphical model for observations connected by a network with potentially different mean vectors, varying smoothly over the network. We propose an efficient estimation algorithm and demonstrate its effectiveness on both simulated and real data, obtaining meaningful and interpretable results on a statistics coauthorship network. We also prove that our method estimates both the inverse covariance matrix and the corresponding graph structure correctly under the assumption of network “cohesion”, which refers to the empirically observed phenomenon of network neighbors sharing similar traits. Tianxi Li, Elizaveta Levina, Ji Zhu 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2004 | Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Intrinsic DimensionabstractWe propose a new method for estimating intrinsic dimension of a dataset derived by applying the principle of maximum likelihood to the distances between close neighbors. We derive the estimator by a Poisson process approximation, assess its bias and variance theo- retically and by simulations, and apply it to a number of simulated and real datasets. We also show it has the best overall performance compared with two other intrinsic dimension estimators. Elizaveta Levina, Peter J. Bickel |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2001 | The Earth Mover's Distance is the Mallows Distance: Some Insights from StatisticsabstractThe Earth Mover's distanc1e was first introduced as a purely empirical ways to measure texture and color similarities. We show that it has a rigorous probabilistic interpretation and is conceptually equivalent to the Mallows distance on probability distributions. The two distances are exactly the same when applied to probability distributions, but behave differently when applied to unnormalized distributions with different masses, called signatures. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both distances, and statistical issues involved in computing them from data. We also report some texture classification results for the Mallows distance applied to texture features and compare several ways of estimating feature distributions. In addition, we list some known probabilistic properties of this distance. Elizaveta Levina, Peter J. Bickel |
ICCV | 1 |