Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew T. Pratola
dblp:49/5915
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4146-2861ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
bayesian additive regression trees |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Combining Climate Models using Bayesian Regression Trees and Random Paths · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › probabilistic regression
bayesian regression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Combining Climate Models using Bayesian Regression Trees and Random Paths · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Environmental and earth informatics
climate modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Combining Climate Models using Bayesian Regression Trees and Random Paths · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.6 | 2 | 2022 | Continuous-Time Birth-Death MCMC for Bayesian Regression Tree Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 Sparse Additive Gaussian Process Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sparse Additive Gaussian Process Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
sparse gaussian process |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sparse Additive Gaussian Process Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › markov processes
birth-death process |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Continuous-Time Birth-Death MCMC for Bayesian Regression Tree Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Combining Climate Models using Bayesian Regression Trees and Random Paths · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
metropolis-hastings |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Sparse Additive Gaussian Process Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semivariogram · 1.7random path assignments · 1.7posterior projection · 1.7bayesian additive regression trees · 1.7metropolis-hastings · 1.0recursive partitioning · 0.6bayesian backfitting · 0.6continuous-time markov process · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Combining Climate Models using Bayesian Regression Trees and Random PathsabstractGeneral circulation models (GCMs) are essential tools for climate studies. Such climate models may have varying accuracy across the input domain, but no model is uniformly best. One can improve climate model prediction performance by integrating multiple models using input-dependent weights. Weight functions modeled using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) were recently shown to be useful in nuclear physics applications. However, a restriction of that approach was the piecewise constant weight functions. To smoothly integrate multiple climate models, we propose a new tree-based model, Random Path BART (RPBART), that incorporates random path assignments in BART to produce smooth weight functions and smooth predictions, all in a matrix-free formulation. RPBART requires a more complex prior specification, for which we introduce a semivariogram to guide hyperparameter selection. This approach is easy to interpret, computationally cheap, and avoids expensive cross-validation. Finally, we propose a posterior projection technique to enable detailed analysis of the fitted weight functions. This allows us to identify a sparse set of climate models that recovers the underlying system within a given spatial region as well as quantifying model discrepancy given the available model set. Our method is demonstrated on an ensemble of 8 GCMs modeling average monthly surface temperature. John C. Yannotty, Thomas J. Santner, Matthew T. Pratola |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2022 | Sparse Additive Gaussian Process RegressionabstractIn this paper we introduce a novel model for Gaussian process (GP) regression in the fully Bayesian setting. Motivated by the ideas of sparsification, localization and Bayesian additive modeling, our model is built around a recursive partitioning (RP) scheme. Within each RP partition, a sparse GP (SGP) regression model is fitted. A Bayesian additive framework then combines multiple layers of partitioned SGPs, capturing both global trends and local refinements with efficient computations. The model addresses both the problem of efficiency in fitting a full Gaussian process regression model and the problem of prediction performance associated with a single SGP. Our approach mitigates the issue of pseudo-input selection and avoids the need for complex inter-block correlations in existing methods. The crucial trade-off becomes choosing between many simpler local model components or fewer complex global model components, which the practitioner can sensibly tune. Implementation is via a Metropolis-Hasting Markov chain Monte-Carlo algorithm with Bayesian back-fitting. We compare our model against popular alternatives on simulated and real datasets, and find the performance is competitive, while the fully Bayesian procedure enables the quantification of model uncertainties. Hengrui Luo, Giovanni Nattino, Matthew T. Pratola |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2020 | Continuous-Time Birth-Death MCMC for Bayesian Regression Tree ModelsabstractDecision trees are flexible models that are well suited for many statistical regression problems. In the Bayesian framework for regression trees, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) search algorithms are required to generate samples of tree models according to their posterior probabilities. The critical component of such MCMC algorithms is to construct "good" Metropolis-Hastings steps to update the tree topology. Such algorithms frequently suffer from poor mixing and local mode stickiness; therefore, the algorithms are slow to converge. Hitherto, authors have primarily used discrete-time birth/death mechanisms for Bayesian (sums of) regression tree models to explore the tree-model space. These algorithms are efficient, in terms of computation and convergence, only if the rejection rate is low which is not always the case. We overcome this issue by developing a novel search algorithm which is based on a continuous-time birth-death Markov process. The search algorithm explores the tree-model space by jumping between parameter spaces corresponding to different tree structures. The jumps occur in continuous time corresponding to the birth-death events which are modeled as independent Poisson processes. In the proposed algorithm, the moves between models are always accepted which can dramatically improve the convergence and mixing properties of the search algorithm. We provide theoretical support of the algorithm for Bayesian regression tree models and demonstrate its performance in a simulated example. Matthew T. Pratola, Maurits Kaptein |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |