Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hang Zhang 0029

dblp:49/6156-29 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
3as first author
10since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9940-3517ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 3 first-author · 9 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 18% Efficient and distributed learning · 18% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
2.542023
PROD: Progressive Distillation for Dense Retrieval · WWW 2023
CAPSTONE: Curriculum Sampling for Dense Retrieval with Document Expansion · EMNLP 2023
Adversarial Retriever-Ranker for Dense Text Retrieval · ICLR 2022
Information retrieval
retrieval models
1.222023
CAPSTONE: Curriculum Sampling for Dense Retrieval with Document Expansion · EMNLP 2023
Metric-guided Distillation: Distilling Knowledge from the Metric to Ranker and Retriever for Generative Commonsense Reasoning · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.712023
PROD: Progressive Distillation for Dense Retrieval · WWW 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.712023
PROD: Progressive Distillation for Dense Retrieval · WWW 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models
knowledge distillation for retrieval
0.712023
PROD: Progressive Distillation for Dense Retrieval · WWW 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.612022
Adversarial Retriever-Ranker for Dense Text Retrieval · ICLR 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.612022
Metric-guided Distillation: Distilling Knowledge from the Metric to Ranker and Retriever for Generative Commonsense Reasoning · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.612022
CodeRetriever: A Large Scale Contrastive Pre-Training Method for Code Search · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training › unsupervised pre-training
contrastive pre-training
0.612022
CodeRetriever: A Large Scale Contrastive Pre-Training Method for Code Search · EMNLP 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
generative commonsense reasoning
0.612022
Metric-guided Distillation: Distilling Knowledge from the Metric to Ranker and Retriever for Generative Commonsense Reasoning · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.612022
Sentiment-Aware Word and Sentence Level Pre-training for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2022
Software maintenance and evolution
code search
0.612022
CodeRetriever: A Large Scale Contrastive Pre-Training Method for Code Search · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › attention module
attention pooling
0.512021
Poolingformer: Long Document Modeling with Pooling Attention · ICML 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › long-context language modeling › context utilization › long-context modeling
long-document modeling
0.512021
Poolingformer: Long Document Modeling with Pooling Attention · ICML 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › information retrieval
document expansion
0.212023
CAPSTONE: Curriculum Sampling for Dense Retrieval with Document Expansion · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training
0.212022
Sentiment-Aware Word and Sentence Level Pre-training for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
sentiment-aware pre-training
0.212022
Sentiment-Aware Word and Sentence Level Pre-training for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.112021
Poolingformer: Long Document Modeling with Pooling Attention · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularization · 1.3pseudo-query generation · 1.3progressive distillation · 1.3curriculum sampling · 1.3knowledge distillation · 1.1contrastive pre-training · 1.1adversarial retriever-ranker · 1.1masked language modeling · 0.6generator-discriminator framework · 0.6dense retrieval · 0.6contrastive learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 APOLLO: An Optimized Training Approach for Long-form Numerical Reasoning
abstract
Long-form numerical reasoning aims to generate a reasoning program to calculate the answer for a given question. Previous work followed a retriever-generator framework, where the retriever selects key facts from a long-form document, and the generator generates a reasoning program based on the retrieved facts. However, they treated all facts equally without considering the different contributions of facts with and without numerical information. Furthermore, they ignored program consistency, leading to the wrong punishment of programs that differed from the ground truth. In order to address these issues, we proposed APOLLO (An optimized training aPproach fOr Long-form numericaL reasOning), to improve long-form numerical reasoning. APOLLO includes a number-aware negative sampling strategy for the retriever to discriminate key numerical facts, and a consistency-based reinforcement learning with target program augmentation for the generator to ultimately increase the execution accuracy. Experimental results on the FinQA and ConvFinQA leaderboards verify the effectiveness of our proposed methods, achieving the new state-of-the-art.
Jiashuo Sun, Hang Zhang 0029, Chen Lin 0001, Xiangdong Su, Yeyun Gong, Jian Guo 0016
LREC/COLING2
2024 Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Cross-lingual Dense Retrieval
abstract
In recent years, multilingual pre-trained language models (mPLMs) have achieved significant progress in cross-lingual dense retrieval. However, most mPLMs neglect the importance of knowledge. Knowledge always conveys similar semantic concepts in a language-agnostic manner, while query-passage pairs in cross-lingual retrieval also share common factual information. Motivated by this observation, we introduce KEPT, a novel mPLM that effectively leverages knowledge to learn language-agnostic semantic representations. To achieve this, we construct a multilingual knowledge base using hyperlinks and cross-language page alignment data annotated by Wiki. From this knowledge base, we mine intra- and cross-language pairs by extracting symmetrically linked segments and multilingual entity descriptions. Subsequently, we adopt contrastive learning with the mined pairs to pre-train KEPT. We evaluate KEPT on three widely-used benchmarks, considering both zero-shot cross-lingual transfer and supervised multilingual fine-tuning scenarios. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that KEPT achieves strong multilingual and cross-lingual retrieval performance with significant improvements over existing mPLMs.
Hang Zhang 0029, Yeyun Gong, Dayiheng Liu, Shunyu Zhang, Xingwei He 0003, Jiancheng Lv 0001, Jian Guo 0016
LREC/COLING1
2023 CAPSTONE: Curriculum Sampling for Dense Retrieval with Document Expansion
abstract
The dual-encoder has become the de facto architecture for dense retrieval.Typically, it computes the latent representations of the query and document independently, thus failing to fully capture the interactions between the query and document.To alleviate this, recent research has focused on obtaining query-informed document representations.During training, it expands the document with a real query, but during inference, it replaces the real query with a generated one.This inconsistency between training and inference causes the dense retrieval model to prioritize query information while disregarding the document when computing the document representation.Consequently, it performs even worse than the vanilla dense retrieval model because its performance heavily relies on the relevance between the generated queries and the real query.In this paper, we propose a curriculum sampling strategy that utilizes pseudo queries during training and progressively enhances the relevance between the generated query and the real query.By doing so, the retrieval model learns to extend its attention from the document alone to both the document and query, resulting in high-quality queryinformed document representations.Experimental results on both in-domain and out-ofdomain datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms previous dense retrieval models.
Xingwei He 0003, Yeyun Gong, A-Long Jin, Hang Zhang 0029, Anlei Dong, Jian Jiao 0007, Siu-Ming Yiu, Nan Duan 0001
EMNLP4
2023 Fantastic Gradients and Where to Find Them: Improving Multi-attribute Text Style Transfer by Quadratic Program
Qian Qu, Jian Wang 0124, Kexin Yang 0002, Hang Zhang 0029, Jiancheng Lv 0001
NLPCC (3)4
2023 PROD: Progressive Distillation for Dense Retrieval
abstract
Knowledge distillation is an effective way to transfer knowledge from a strong teacher to an efficient student model. Ideally, we expect the better the teacher is, the better the student performs. However, this expectation does not always come true. It is common that a strong teacher model results in a bad student via distillation due to the nonnegligible gap between teacher and student. To bridge the gap, we propose PROD, a PROgressive Distillation method, for dense retrieval. PROD consists of a teacher progressive distillation and a data progressive distillation to gradually improve the student. To alleviate catastrophic forgetting, we introduce a regularization term in each distillation process. We conduct extensive experiments on seven datasets including five widely-used publicly available benchmarks: MS MARCO Passage, TREC Passage 19, TREC Document 19, MS MARCO Document, and Natural Questions, as well as two industry datasets: Bing-Rel and Bing-Ads. PROD achieves the state-of-the-art in the distillation methods for dense retrieval. Our 6-layer student model even surpasses most of the existing 12-layer models on all five public benchmarks. The code and models are released in https://github.com/microsoft/SimXNS.
Zhenghao Lin, Yeyun Gong, Xiao Liu 0029, Hang Zhang 0029, Chen Lin 0001, Anlei Dong, Jian Jiao 0007, Jingwen Lu, Daxin Jiang, Rangan Majumder, Nan Duan 0001
WWW4
2022 Metric-guided Distillation: Distilling Knowledge from the Metric to Ranker and Retriever for Generative Commonsense Reasoning
abstract
Xingwei He, Yeyun Gong, A-Long Jin, Weizhen Qi, Hang Zhang, Jian Jiao, Bartuer Zhou, Biao Cheng, Sm Yiu, Nan Duan. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
Xingwei He 0003, Yeyun Gong, A-Long Jin, Weizhen Qi, Hang Zhang 0029, Jian Jiao 0007, Bartuer Zhou, Biao Cheng, Siu-Ming Yiu, Nan Duan 0001
EMNLP5
2022 Sentiment-Aware Word and Sentence Level Pre-training for Sentiment Analysis
abstract
Most existing pre-trained language representation models (PLMs) are sub-optimal in sentiment analysis tasks, as they capture the sentiment information from word-level while underconsidering sentence-level information.In this paper, we propose SentiWSP, a novel Sentiment-aware pre-trained language model with combined Word-level and Sentence-level Pre-training tasks.The word level pre-training task detects replaced sentiment words, via a generator-discriminator framework, to enhance the PLM's knowledge about sentiment words.The sentence level pre-training task further strengthens the discriminator via a contrastive learning framework, with similar sentences as negative samples, to encode sentiments in a sentence.Extensive experimental results show that SentiWSP achieves new state-of-the-art performance on various sentence-level and aspectlevel sentiment classification benchmarks.We have made our code and model publicly available at https://github.com/XMUDM/SentiWSP.
Shuai Fan 0007, Chen Lin 0001, Haonan Li 0002, Zhenghao Lin, Jinsong Su, Hang Zhang 0029, Yeyun Gong, Jian Guo 0016, Nan Duan 0001
EMNLP6
2022 CodeRetriever: A Large Scale Contrastive Pre-Training Method for Code Search
abstract
Xiaonan Li, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen, Xipeng Qiu, Hang Zhang, Bolun Yao, Weizhen Qi, Daxin Jiang, Weizhu Chen, Nan Duan. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen, Xipeng Qiu, Hang Zhang 0029, Bolun Yao, Weizhen Qi, Daxin Jiang, Weizhu Chen, Nan Duan 0001
EMNLP5
2022 Adversarial Retriever-Ranker for Dense Text Retrieval
Hang Zhang 0029, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen, Jiancheng Lv 0001, Nan Duan 0001, Weizhu Chen
ICLR1
2021 Poolingformer: Long Document Modeling with Pooling Attention
abstract
In this paper, we introduce a two-level attention schema, Poolingformer, for long document modeling. Its first level uses a smaller sliding window pattern to aggregate information from neighbors. Its second level employs a larger window to increase receptive fields with pooling attention to reduce both computational cost and memory consumption. We first evaluate Poolingformer on two long sequence QA tasks: the monolingual NQ and the multilingual TyDi QA. Experimental results show that Poolingformer sits atop three official leaderboards measured by F1, outperforming previous state-of-the-art models by 1.9 points (79.8 vs. 77.9) on NQ long answer, 1.9 points (79.5 vs. 77.6) on TyDi QA passage answer, and 1.6 points (67.6 vs. 66.0) on TyDi QA minimal answer. We further evaluate Poolingformer on a long sequence summarization task. Experimental results on the arXiv benchmark continue to demonstrate its superior performance.
Hang Zhang 0029, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen, Weisheng Li 0001, Jiancheng Lv 0001, Nan Duan 0001, Weizhu Chen
ICML1
2020 Key Factors of Email Subject Generation
Mingfeng Xue, Hang Zhang 0029, Jiancheng Lv 0001
ICONIP (4)2
2020 The COVID-19 outbreak in Sichuan, China: Epidemiology and impact of interventions
abstract
In January 2020, a COVID-19 outbreak was detected in Sichuan Province of China. Six weeks later, the outbreak was successfully contained. The aim of this work is to characterize the epidemiology of the Sichuan outbreak and estimate the impact of interventions in limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We analyzed patient records for all laboratory-confirmed cases reported in the province for the period of January 21 to March 16, 2020. To estimate the basic and daily reproduction numbers, we used a Bayesian framework. In addition, we estimated the number of cases averted by the implemented control strategies. The outbreak resulted in 539 confirmed cases, lasted less than two months, and no further local transmission was detected after February 27. The median age of local cases was 8 years older than that of imported cases. We estimated R0 at 2.4 (95% CI: 1.6-3.7). The epidemic was self-sustained for about 3 weeks before going below the epidemic threshold 3 days after the declaration of a public health emergency by Sichuan authorities. Our findings indicate that, were the control measures be adopted four weeks later, the epidemic could have lasted 49 days longer (95% CI: 31-68 days), causing 9,216 more cases (95% CI: 1,317-25,545).
Quanhui Liu, Ana I. Bento, Kexin Yang 0002, Hang Zhang 0029, Stefano Merler, Alessandro Vespignani, Jiancheng Lv 0001, Tao Zhou 0001, Marco Ajelli
PLoS Comput. Biol.4