Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yi Chen 0015

dblp:49/6574-15 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Biometric security · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Biometric security › biometric fusion
multimodal biometric fusion
0.112008
Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008
Biometric security › biometric fusion
score-level fusion
0.112008
Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008
Biometric security
fingerprint recognition
0.112007
Pores and Ridges: High-Resolution Fingerprint Matching Using Level 3 Features · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2007
Biometric security › fingerprint recognition
latent fingerprint matching
0.112007
Pores and Ridges: High-Resolution Fingerprint Matching Using Level 3 Features · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

likelihood ratio test · 0.1gaussian mixture model · 0.1wavelet transform · 0.1iterative closest point · 0.1gabor filter · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion
abstract
Multibiometric systems fuse information from different sources to compensate for the limitations in performance of individual matchers. We propose a framework for optimal combination of match scores that is based on the likelihood ratio test. The distributions of genuine and impostor match scores are modeled as finite Gaussian mixture model. The proposed fusion approach is general in its ability to handle (i) discrete values in biometric match score distributions, (ii) arbitrary scales and distributions of match scores, (iii) correlation between the scores of multiple matchers and (iv) sample quality of multiple biometric sources. Experiments on three multibiometric databases indicate that the proposed fusion framework achieves consistently high performance compared to commonly used score fusion techniques based on score transformation and classification.
Karthik Nandakumar, Yi Chen 0015, Sarat C. Dass, Anil K. Jain 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2007 Pores and Ridges: High-Resolution Fingerprint Matching Using Level 3 Features
abstract
Fingerprint friction ridge details are generally described in a hierarchical order at three different levels, namely, Level 1 (pattern), Level 2 (minutia points), and Level 3 (pores and ridge contours). Although latent print examiners frequently take advantage of Level 3 features to assist in identification, Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS) currently rely only on Level 1 and Level 2 features. In fact, the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) standard of fingerprint resolution for AFIS is 500 pixels per inch (ppi), which is inadequate for capturing Level 3 features, such as pores. With the advances in fingerprint sensing technology, many sensors are now equipped with dual resolution (500 ppi/1,000 ppi) scanning capability. However, increasing the scan resolution alone does not necessarily provide any performance improvement in fingerprint matching, unless an extended feature set is utilized. As a result, a systematic study to determine how much performance gain one can achieve by introducing Level 3 features in AFIS is highly desired. We propose a hierarchical matching system that utilizes features at all the three levels extracted from 1,000 ppi fingerprint scans. Level 3 features, including pores and ridge contours, are automatically extracted using Gabor filters and wavelet transform and are locally matched using the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm. Our experiments show that Level 3 features carry significant discriminatory information. There is a relative reduction of 20 percent in the equal error rate (EER) of the matching system when Level 3 features are employed in combination with Level 1 and 2 features. This significant performance gain is consistently observed across various quality fingerprint images.
Anil K. Jain 0001, Yi Chen 0015, Meltem Demirkus
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2