Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antony Rybczynski

dblp:49/6883 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1980
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching
packet switching
0.011980
X.25 Interface and End-to-End Virtual Circuit Service Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Routing and switching › packet switching
virtual circuit
0.011980
X.25 Interface and End-to-End Virtual Circuit Service Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

protocol specification analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1980 A Common X.25 Interface to Public Data Networks
Antony Rybczynski, John Palframan
Comput. Networks1
1980 X.25 Interface and End-to-End Virtual Circuit Service Characteristics
abstract
Public packet switching networks around the world use CCITT Recommendation X.25, which is the standard device-independent interface between packet networks and user devices operating in the packet-mode. Since its development in 1976 and with four years of network operational experience, the X.25 interface specification has reached a high level of maturity. A revised version of X.25 has been approved by CCITT Study Group VII at its meeting in February 1980. The revised X.25 specification is more complete than its predecessor, eliminates a number of ambiguous areas which lead to network implementation differences, and has been enhanced by the addition of new capabilities both to the X.25 interface and to the end-to-end service. This paper presents a consolidated view of the end-to-end characteristics of the virtual-circuit-based services accessible through the X.25 interface. It then discusses the characteristics of the revised X.25 interface, with emphasis on areas that have been addressed in the revised Recommendation. The revised Recommendation leads the way to greater commonality among network implementations. The increased functionality of the end-to-end virtual-circuit services has impact on the relationship of X.25 to system architectures being discussed by international standards bodies.
Antony Rybczynski
IEEE Trans. Commun.1