Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lala Li
dblp:49/7563
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-5221-1872ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Generative modeling · 43% Efficient and distributed learning · 11% Segmentation and scene understanding · 9% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Rendering · 87% Virtual and augmented reality · 13% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
2.1 | 3 | 2025 | Controlling Space and Time with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2025 A Generalist Framework for Panoptic Segmentation of Images and Videos · ICCV 2023 Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › hierarchical diffusion model
cascaded diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Controlling Space and Time with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2025 |
Rendering › novel view synthesis
dynamic view synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Controlling Space and Time with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2025 |
Rendering
novel view synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Controlling Space and Time with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Guiding image captioning models toward more specific captions · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
classifier-free guidance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Guiding image captioning models toward more specific captions · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model › discrete generative model
discrete data generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Generalist Framework for Panoptic Segmentation of Images and Videos · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Guiding image captioning models toward more specific captions · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
panoptic segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Generalist Framework for Panoptic Segmentation of Images and Videos · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › panoptic segmentation
video panoptic segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Generalist Framework for Panoptic Segmentation of Images and Videos · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Pix2seq: A Language Modeling Framework for Object Detection · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
sequence generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Pix2seq: A Language Modeling Framework for Object Detection · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation › conditional image synthesis
text-conditioned image synthesis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Losses · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
feature suppression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Losses · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model quantization
differentiable quantization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Differentiable Product Quantization for End-to-End Embedding Compression · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
embedding compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Differentiable Product Quantization for End-to-End Embedding Compression · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Differentiable Product Quantization for End-to-End Embedding Compression · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
product quantization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Differentiable Product Quantization for End-to-End Embedding Compression · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient descent
critical batch size |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Which Algorithmic Choices Matter at Which Batch Sizes? Insights From a Noisy Quadratic Model · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
large-batch training |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Which Algorithmic Choices Matter at Which Batch Sizes? Insights From a Noisy Quadratic Model · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
preconditioned gradient descent |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Which Algorithmic Choices Matter at Which Batch Sizes? Insights From a Noisy Quadratic Model · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Which Algorithmic Choices Matter at Which Batch Sizes? Insights From a Noisy Quadratic Model · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structure from motion · 1.7cascaded diffusion · 1.7diffusion model · 1.2classifier-free guidance · 1.2language model guidance · 0.7CLIPScore · 0.7sequence-to-sequence modeling · 0.6sequence-to-sequence · 0.6prompt-based task specification · 0.6language modeling · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Controlling Space and Time with Diffusion ModelsabstractWe present 4DiM, a cascaded diffusion model for 4D novel view synthesis (NVS), supporting generation with arbitrary camera trajectories and timestamps, in natural scenes, conditioned on one or more images. With a novel architecture and sampling procedure, we enable training on a mixture of 3D (with camera pose), 4D (pose+time) and video (time but no pose) data, which greatly improves generalization to unseen images and camera pose trajectories over prior works which generally operate in limited domains (e.g., object centric).
4DiM is the first-ever NVS method with intuitive metric-scale camera pose control enabled by our novel calibration pipeline for structure-from-motion-posed data. Experiments demonstrate that 4DiM outperforms prior 3D NVS models both in terms of
image fidelity and pose alignment, while also enabling the generation of scene dynamics. 4DiM provides a general framework for a variety of tasks including single-image-to-3D, two-image-to-video (interpolation and extrapolation), and pose-conditioned video-to-video translation, which we illustrate qualitatively on a variety of scenes.
See https://4d-diffusion.github.io for video samples. Daniel Watson, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Andrea Tagliasacchi, David J. Fleet |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | A Generalist Framework for Panoptic Segmentation of Images and VideosabstractPanoptic segmentation assigns semantic and instance ID labels to every pixel of an image. As permutations of instance IDs are also valid solutions, the task requires learning of high-dimensional one-to-many mapping. As a result, state-of-the-art approaches use customized architectures and task-specific loss functions. We formulate panoptic segmentation as a discrete data generation problem, without relying on inductive bias of the task. A diffusion model is proposed to model panoptic masks, with a simple architecture and generic loss function. By simply adding past predictions as a conditioning signal, our method is capable of modeling video (in a streaming setting) and thereby learns to track object instances automatically. With extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our simple approach can perform competitively to state-of-the-art specialist methods in similar settings.1 Ting Chen 0007, Lala Li, Saurabh Saxena, Geoffrey E. Hinton, David J. Fleet |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2023 | Guiding image captioning models toward more specific captionsabstractImage captioning is conventionally formulated as the task of generating captions for images that match the distribution of reference image-caption pairs. However, reference captions in standard captioning datasets are short and may not uniquely identify the images they describe. These problems are further exacerbated when models are trained directly on image-alt text pairs collected from the internet. In this work, we show that it is possible to generate more specific captions with minimal changes to the training process. We implement classifier-free guidance [14] for an autoregressive captioning model by fine-tuning it to estimate both conditional and unconditional distributions over captions. The guidance scale applied at decoding controls a trade-off between maximizing p(caption|image) and p(image|caption). Compared to standard greedy decoding, decoding with a guidance scale of 2 substantially improves reference-free metrics such as CLIPScore (0.808 vs. 0.775) and caption→image retrieval performance in the CLIP embedding space (recall@1 44.6% vs. 26.5%), but worsens standard reference-based captioning metrics (e.g., CIDEr 78.6 vs 126.1). We further explore the use of language models to guide the decoding process, obtaining small improvements over the Pareto frontier of reference-free vs. reference-based captioning metrics that arises from classifier-free guidance, and substantially improving the quality of captions generated from a model trained only on minimally curated web data. Simon Kornblith, Lala Li |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2022 | Pix2seq: A Language Modeling Framework for Object Detection
Ting Chen 0007, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, David J. Fleet, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | A Unified Sequence Interface for Vision TasksabstractWhile language tasks are naturally expressed in a single, unified, modeling framework, i.e., generating sequences of tokens, this has not been the case in computer vision. As a result, there is a proliferation of distinct architectures and loss functions for different vision tasks. In this work we show that a diverse set of "core" computer vision tasks can also be unified if formulated in terms of a shared pixel-to-sequence interface. We focus on four tasks, namely, object detection, instance segmentation, keypoint detection, and image captioning, all with diverse types of outputs, e.g., bounding boxes or dense masks. Despite that, by formulating the output of each task as a sequence of discrete tokens with a unified interface, we show that one can train a neural network with a single model architecture and loss function on all these tasks, with no task-specific customization. To solve a specific task, we use a short prompt as task description, and the sequence output adapts to the prompt so it can produce task-specific output. We show that such a model can achieve competitive performance compared to well-established task-specific models. Ting Chen 0007, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Tsung-Yi Lin, David J. Fleet, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language UnderstandingabstractWe present Imagen, a text-to-image diffusion model with an unprecedented degree of photorealism and a deep level of language understanding. Imagen builds on the power of large transformer language models in understanding text and hinges on the strength of diffusion models in high-fidelity image generation. Our key discovery is that generic large language models (e.g., T5), pretrained on text-only corpora, are surprisingly effective at encoding text for image synthesis: increasing the size of the language model in Imagen boosts both sample fidelity and image-text alignment much more than increasing the size of the image diffusion model. Imagen achieves a new state-of-the-art FID score of 7.27 on the COCO dataset, without ever training on COCO, and human raters find Imagen samples to be on par with the COCO data itself in image-text alignment. To assess text-to-image models in greater depth, we introduce DrawBench, a comprehensive and challenging benchmark for text-to-image models. With DrawBench, we compare Imagen with recent methods including VQ-GAN+CLIP, Latent Diffusion Models, and DALL-E 2, and find that human raters prefer Imagen over other models in side-by-side comparisons, both in terms of sample quality and image-text alignment. Chitwan Saharia, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Remi Denton, Seyed Kamyar Seyed Ghasemipour, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Tim Salimans, Jonathan Ho, David J. Fleet, Mohammad Norouzi 0002 |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Intriguing Properties of Contrastive LossesabstractWe study three intriguing properties of contrastive learning. First, we generalize the standard contrastive loss to a broader family of losses, and we find that various instantiations of the generalized loss perform similarly under the presence of a multi-layer non-linear projection head. Second, we study if instance-based contrastive learning (with a global image representation) can learn well on images with multiple objects present. We find that meaningful hierarchical local features can be learned despite the fact that these objectives operate on global instance-level features. Finally, we study the phenomenon of feature suppression among competing features shared across augmented views, such as "color distribution" vs "object class". We construct datasets with explicit and controllable competing features, and show that, for contrastive learning, a few bits of easy-to-learn shared features can suppress, and even fully prevent, the learning of other sets of competing features. In scenarios where there are multiple objects in an image, the dominant object would suppress the learning of smaller objects. Existing contrastive learning methods critically rely on data augmentation to favor certain sets of features over others, and could suffer from learning saturation for scenarios where existing augmentations cannot fully address the feature suppression. This poses open challenges to existing contrastive learning techniques. Ting Chen 0007, Calvin Luo, Lala Li |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Differentiable Product Quantization for End-to-End Embedding CompressionabstractEmbedding layers are commonly used to map discrete symbols into continuous embedding vectors that reflect their semantic meanings. Despite their effectiveness, the number of parameters in an embedding layer increases linearly with the number of symbols and poses a critical challenge on memory and storage constraints. In this work, we propose a generic and end-to-end learnable compression framework termed differentiable product quantization (DPQ). We present two instantiations of DPQ that leverage different approximation techniques to enable differentiability in end-to-end learning. Our method can readily serve as a drop-in alternative for any existing embedding layer. Empirically, DPQ offers significant compression ratios (14-238X) at negligible or no performance cost on 10 datasets across three different language tasks. Ting Chen 0007, Lala Li, Yizhou Sun |
ICML | 2 |
| 2019 | Which Algorithmic Choices Matter at Which Batch Sizes? Insights From a Noisy Quadratic ModelabstractIncreasing the batch size is a popular way to speed up neural network training, but beyond some critical batch size, larger batch sizes yield diminishing returns. In this work, we study how the critical batch size changes based on properties of the optimization algorithm, including acceleration and preconditioning, through two different lenses: large scale experiments and analysis using a simple noisy quadratic model (NQM). We experimentally demonstrate that optimization algorithms that employ preconditioning, specifically Adam and K-FAC, result in much larger critical batch sizes than stochastic gradient descent with momentum. We also demonstrate that the NQM captures many of the essential features of real neural network training, despite being drastically simpler to work with. The NQM predicts our results with preconditioned optimizers, previous results with accelerated gradient descent, and other results around optimal learning rates and large batch training, making it a useful tool to generate testable predictions about neural network optimization. We demonstrate empirically that the simple noisy quadratic model (NQM) displays many similarities to neural networks in terms of large-batch training. We prove analytical convergence results for the NQM model that predict such behavior and hence provide possible explanations and a better understanding for many large-batch training phenomena. Guodong Zhang 0006, Lala Li, Zachary Nado, James Martens, Sushant Sachdeva, George E. Dahl, Christopher J. Shallue, Roger B. Grosse |
NeurIPS | 2 |