Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Justin Price

dblp:49/7880 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 50% Empirical software engineering · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
software process
0.112009
Applications of Simulation and AI Search: Assessing the Relative Merits of Agile vs Traditional Software Development · ASE 2009
Algorithms and data structures
search algorithms
0.012009
Applications of Simulation and AI Search: Assessing the Relative Merits of Agile vs Traditional Software Development · ASE 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.2AI search · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Applications of Simulation and AI Search: Assessing the Relative Merits of Agile vs Traditional Software Development
abstract
This paper augments Boehm-Turner's model of agile and plan-based software development augmented with an AI search algorithm. The AI search finds the key factors that predict for the success of agile or traditional plan-based software developments. According to our simulations and AI search algorithm: (1) in no case did agile methods perform worse than plan-based approaches; (2) in some cases, agile performed best. Hence, we recommend that the default development practice for organizations be an agile method. The simplicity of this style of analysis begs the question: why is so much time wasted on evidence-less debates on software process when a simple combination of simulation plus automatic search can mature the dialog much faster?
Bryan Lemon, Aaron Riesbeck, Tim Menzies, Justin Price, Joseph D'Alessandro, Rikard Carlsson, Tomi Prifiti, Fayola Peters, Huihua Lu, Daniel Port
ASE4