Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haojun Chen
dblp:50/10432
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Time series and sequential data · 28% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Reinforcement learning · 14% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 28 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis › time series forecasting
long-term time series forecasting |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | SparseTSF: Lightweight and Robust Time Series Forecasting via Sparse Modeling · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 SparseTSF: Modeling Long-term Time Series Forecasting with *1k* Parameters · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | SparseTSF: Lightweight and Robust Time Series Forecasting via Sparse Modeling · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 SparseTSF: Modeling Long-term Time Series Forecasting with *1k* Parameters · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | SparseTSF: Lightweight and Robust Time Series Forecasting via Sparse Modeling · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 SparseTSF: Modeling Long-term Time Series Forecasting with *1k* Parameters · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
lightweight forecasting model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SparseTSF: Lightweight and Robust Time Series Forecasting via Sparse Modeling · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Temporal Query Network for Efficient Multivariate Time Series Forecasting · ICML 2025 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
diffusion policy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Falcon: Fast Visuomotor Policies via Partial Denoising · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis › time series forecasting
multivariate time series forecasting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Temporal Query Network for Efficient Multivariate Time Series Forecasting · ICML 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Falcon: Fast Visuomotor Policies via Partial Denoising · ICML 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning
visuomotor policy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Falcon: Fast Visuomotor Policies via Partial Denoising · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
lightweight neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SparseTSF: Modeling Long-term Time Series Forecasting with *1k* Parameters · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
preference-based reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence guarantees |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MANSA: Learning Fast and Slow in Multi-Agent Systems · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning › decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning
independent learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MANSA: Learning Fast and Slow in Multi-Agent Systems · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MANSA: Learning Fast and Slow in Multi-Agent Systems · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.4 | 3 | 2012 | Nonparametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Analysis of Noisy and Incomplete Images · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012 Topic Modeling with Nonparametric Markov Tree · ICML 2011 Non-Parametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Sparse Image Representations · NIPS 2009 |
Data mining › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Temporal Query Network for Efficient Multivariate Time Series Forecasting · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | MANSA: Learning Fast and Slow in Multi-Agent Systems · ICML 2023 |
Image and video processing
compressive sensing |
0.2 | 2 | 2012 | Nonparametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Analysis of Noisy and Incomplete Images · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012 Non-Parametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Sparse Image Representations · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
indian buffet process |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Nonparametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Analysis of Noisy and Incomplete Images · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012 |
Image and video processing › sparse representation
dictionary learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Nonparametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Analysis of Noisy and Incomplete Images · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image recovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Nonparametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Analysis of Noisy and Incomplete Images · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
nonparametric topic modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Topic Modeling with Nonparametric Markov Tree · ICML 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Topic Modeling with Nonparametric Markov Tree · ICML 2011 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
dictionary learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Non-Parametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Sparse Image Representations · NIPS 2009 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Non-Parametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Sparse Image Representations · NIPS 2009 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Non-Parametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Sparse Image Representations · NIPS 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cross-period sparse forecasting · 1.8multi-layer perceptron · 1.7attention mechanism · 1.7singular value decomposition · 1.5low-rank adaptation · 1.5sparse modeling · 1.0diffusion model · 0.9action reuse · 0.9downsampling · 0.8centralized learning · 0.7dirichlet process · 0.2stick-breaking process · 0.1beta-bernoulli process · 0.1variational bayesian inference · 0.1gibbs sampling · 0.1beta process · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | SparseTSF: Lightweight and Robust Time Series Forecasting via Sparse ModelingabstractThis paper introduces SparseTSF, a novel and extremely lightweight method for Long-term Time Series Forecasting (LTSF), designed to address the challenges of modeling complex temporal dependencies over extended horizons with minimal computational resources. At the heart of SparseTSF lies the Cross-Period Sparse Forecasting technique, which simplifies the forecasting task by downsampling the original sequences to focus on cross-period trend prediction. This technique not only significantly reduces model complexity and the number of parameters but also serves as an implicit regularization mechanism that enhances the model's robustness, achieving an optimal balance between performance and efficiency. Based on this technique, SparseTSF uses fewer than 1,000 parameters to achieve competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art methods, with evident advantages under longer look-back windows (e.g., 720) that allow the model to better exploit inherent periodicity and trend information. Furthermore, SparseTSF showcases remarkable generalization capabilities, making it well-suited for scenarios with limited computational resources, small samples, or low-quality data. Shengsheng Lin, Weiwei Lin 0001, Wentai Wu, Haojun Chen, C. L. Philip Chen |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2025 | Falcon: Fast Visuomotor Policies via Partial DenoisingabstractDiffusion policies are widely adopted in complex visuomotor tasks for their ability to capture multimodal action distributions. However, the multiple sampling steps required for action generation significantly harm real-time inference efficiency, which limits their applicability in real-time decision-making scenarios. Existing acceleration techniques either require retraining or degrade performance under low sampling steps. Here we propose Falcon, which mitigates this speed-performance trade-off and achieves further acceleration. The core insight is that visuomotor tasks exhibit sequential dependencies between actions. Falcon leverages this by reusing partially denoised actions from historical information rather than sampling from Gaussian noise at each step. By integrating current observations, Falcon reduces sampling steps while preserving performance. Importantly, Falcon is a training-free algorithm that can be applied as a plug-in to further improve decision efficiency on top of existing acceleration techniques. We validated Falcon in 48 simulated environments and 2 real-world robot experiments. demonstrating a 2-7x speedup with negligible performance degradation, offering a promising direction for efficient visuomotor policy design. Haojun Chen, Chengdong Ma, Xiaojian Ma 0001, Zailin Ma, Huimin Wu 0001, Yuanpei Chen, Yifan Zhong, Qing Li 0003, Yaodong Yang 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Temporal Query Network for Efficient Multivariate Time Series ForecastingabstractSufficiently modeling the correlations among variables (aka channels) is crucial for achieving accurate multivariate time series forecasting (MTSF). In this paper, we propose a novel technique called Temporal Query (TQ) to more effectively capture multivariate correlations, thereby improving model performance in MTSF tasks. Technically, the TQ technique employs periodically shifted learnable vectors as queries in the attention mechanism to capture global inter-variable patterns, while the keys and values are derived from the raw input data to encode local, sample-level correlations. Building upon the TQ technique, we develop a simple yet efficient model named Temporal Query Network (TQNet), which employs only a single-layer attention mechanism and a lightweight multi-layer perceptron (MLP). Extensive experiments demonstrate that TQNet learns more robust multivariate correlations, achieving state-of-the-art forecasting accuracy across 12 challenging real-world datasets. Furthermore, TQNet achieves high efficiency comparable to linear-based methods even on high-dimensional datasets, balancing performance and computational cost. The code is available at: https://github.com/ACAT-SCUT/TQNet. Shengsheng Lin, Haojun Chen, Haijie Wu, Chunyun Qiu |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | SparseTSF: Modeling Long-term Time Series Forecasting with *1k* ParametersabstractThis paper introduces SparseTSF, a novel, extremely lightweight model for Long-term Time Series Forecasting (LTSF), designed to address the challenges of modeling complex temporal dependencies over extended horizons with minimal computational resources. At the heart of SparseTSF lies the Cross-Period Sparse Forecasting technique, which simplifies the forecasting task by decoupling the periodicity and trend in time series data. This technique involves downsampling the original sequences to focus on cross-period trend prediction, effectively extracting periodic features while minimizing the model’s complexity and parameter count. Based on this technique, the SparseTSF model uses fewer than 1k parameters to achieve competitive or superior performance compared to state-of-the-art models. Furthermore, SparseTSF showcases remarkable generalization capabilities, making it well-suited for scenarios with limited computational resources, small samples, or low-quality data. The code is publicly available at this repository: https://github.com/lss-1138/SparseTSF. Shengsheng Lin, Weiwei Lin 0001, Wentai Wu, Haojun Chen |
ICML | 4 |
| 2024 | Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMsabstractCurrent methods for large language model alignment typically use scalar human preference labels. However, this convention tends to oversimplify the multi-dimensional and heterogeneous nature of human preferences, leading to reduced expressivity and even misalignment. This paper presents Panacea, an innovative approach that reframes alignment as a multi-dimensional preference optimization problem. Panacea trains a single model capable of adapting online and Pareto-optimally to diverse sets of preferences without the need for further tuning. A major challenge here is using a low-dimensional preference vector to guide the model's behavior, despite it being governed by an overwhelmingly large number of parameters. To address this, Panacea is designed to use singular value decomposition (SVD)-based low-rank adaptation, which allows the preference vector to be simply injected online as singular values. Theoretically, we prove that Panacea recovers the entire Pareto front with common loss aggregation methods under mild conditions. Moreover, our experiments demonstrate, for the first time, the feasibility of aligning a single LLM to represent an exponentially vast spectrum of human preferences through various optimization methods. Our work marks a step forward in effectively and efficiently aligning models to diverse and intricate human preferences in a controllable and Pareto-optimal manner. Yifan Zhong, Chengdong Ma, Ziran Yang, Haojun Chen, Qingfu Zhang 0001, Siyuan Qi, Yaodong Yang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | MANSA: Learning Fast and Slow in Multi-Agent SystemsabstractIn multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), independent learning (IL) often shows remarkable performance and easily scales with the number of agents. Yet, using IL can be inefficient and runs the risk of failing to successfully train, particularly in scenarios that require agents to coordinate their actions. Using centralised learning (CL) enables MARL agents to quickly learn how to coordinate their behaviour but employing CL everywhere is often prohibitively expensive in real-world applications. Besides, using CL in value-based methods often needs strong representational constraints (e.g. individual-global-max condition) that can lead to poor performance if violated. In this paper, we introduce a novel plug & play IL framework named Multi-Agent Network Selection Algorithm (MANSA) which selectively employs CL only at states that require coordination. At its core, MANSA has an additional agent that uses switching controls to quickly learn the best states to activate CL during training, using CL only where necessary and vastly reducing the computational burden of CL. Our theory proves MANSA preserves cooperative MARL convergence properties, boosts IL performance and can optimally make use of a fixed budget on the number CL calls. We show empirically in Level-based Foraging (LBF) and StarCraft Multi-agent Challenge (SMAC) that MANSA achieves fast, superior and more reliable performance while making 40% fewer CL calls in SMAC and using CL at only 1% CL calls in LBF. David Mguni, Haojun Chen, Taher Jafferjee, Longfei Yue, Xidong Feng, Stephen McAleer, Feifei Tong, Jun Wang 0012, Yaodong Yang 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2012 | Nonparametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Analysis of Noisy and Incomplete ImagesabstractNonparametric Bayesian methods are considered for recovery of imagery based upon compressive, incomplete, and/or noisy measurements. A truncated beta-Bernoulli process is employed to infer an appropriate dictionary for the data under test and also for image recovery. In the context of compressive sensing, significant improvements in image recovery are manifested using learned dictionaries, relative to using standard orthonormal image expansions. The compressive-measurement projections are also optimized for the learned dictionary. Additionally, we consider simpler (incomplete) measurements, defined by measuring a subset of image pixels, uniformly selected at random. Spatial interrelationships within imagery are exploited through use of the Dirichlet and probit stick-breaking processes. Several example results are presented, with comparisons to other methods in the literature. Mingyuan Zhou, Haojun Chen, John W. Paisley, Lingbo Li 0002, Zhengming Xing, David B. Dunson, Guillermo Sapiro, Lawrence Carin |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 2 |
| 2011 | Topic Modeling with Nonparametric Markov Tree
Haojun Chen, David B. Dunson, Lawrence Carin |
ICML | 1 |
| 2010 | Tree-Structured Compressive Sensing With Variational Bayesian AnalysisabstractIn compressive sensing (CS) the known structure in the transform coefficients may be leveraged to improve reconstruction accuracy. We here develop a hierarchical statistical model applicable to both wavelet and JPEG-based DCT bases, in which the tree structure in the sparseness pattern is exploited explicitly. The analysis is performed efficiently via variational Bayesian (VB) analysis, and comparisons are made with MCMC-based inference, and with many of the CS algorithms in the literature. Performance is assessed for both noise-free and noisy CS measurements, based on both JPEG-DCT and wavelet representations. Lihan He, Haojun Chen, Lawrence Carin |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 2 |
| 2009 | Non-Parametric Bayesian Dictionary Learning for Sparse Image RepresentationsabstractNon-parametric Bayesian techniques are considered for learning dictionaries for sparse image representations, with applications in denoising, inpainting and compressive sensing (CS). The beta process is employed as a prior for learning the dictionary, and this non-parametric method naturally infers an appropriate dictionary size. The Dirichlet process and a probit stick-breaking process are also considered to exploit structure within an image. The proposed method can learn a sparse dictionary in situ; training images may be exploited if available, but they are not required. Further, the noise variance need not be known, and can be non-stationary. Another virtue of the proposed method is that sequential inference can be readily employed, thereby allowing scaling to large images. Several example results are presented, using both Gibbs and variational Bayesian inference, with comparisons to other state-of-the-art approaches. Mingyuan Zhou, Haojun Chen, John W. Paisley, Guillermo Sapiro, Lawrence Carin |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2005 | Adaptive despeckling SAR images based on scale space correlationabstractIn this paper, a new adaptive filtering algorithm is proposed to remove speckle in SAR images. This method differentiates the detail edge information from the noisy images based on scale space correlation. The Wiener filter is used to deal with the edge information of points and the Bayesian soft threshold is applied to the noisy points in homogeneous areas to reduce speckle. After processed with this algorithm, SAR images can not only achieve a satisfactory despeckling effect but also show good performance in preserving details and texture information. Mengdao Xing, Zheng Bao 0001, Haojun Chen |
ICASSP (2) | 4 |