Digital news platforms rely on recommendation systems to meet the diverse information needs of readers. However, most research focuses on major, resource-rich languages, overlooking the linguistic diversity of online communities. Moreover, existing work typically assumes monolingual news consumption, neglecting polyglot users, and resulting in a lack of multilingual benchmarks for developing recommenders suited to multilingual and low-resource contexts. To address this gap, we introduce xMIND, an open, multilingual news recommendation dataset created by machine translating the English MIND dataset into 14 linguistically and geographically diverse languages with varying digital footprints. Using xMIND, we systematically evaluate several content-based neural news recommenders (NNRs) in zero-shot ( ZS-XLT ) and few-shot ( FS-XLT ) cross-lingual transfer, examining both monolingual and bilingual consumption patterns. In FS-XLT , we compare random and category-based replacement methods for incorporating target-language data during training. Our results show that (i) current NNRs, grounded in multilingual language models, experience significant performance drops in ZS-XLT , and (ii) injecting target-language data in FS-XLT provides limited improvements, especially for bilingual consumption. Notably, randomly injecting target-language news during training leads to greater performance gains compared to category-based replacements. Our in-depth analysis of representation alignment between source and target languages within the language model shows that FS-XLT improves cross-lingual alignment primarily for high-resource languages, while low-resource languages remain weakly aligned with English. These findings highlight the need for broader research efforts in multilingual and cross-lingual news recommendation. We release xMIND at https://github.com/andreeaiana/xMIND .

The process mining community has recently recognized the potential of large language models (LLMs) for tackling various process mining tasks. Initial studies report the capability of LLMs to support process analysis and even, to some extent, that they are able to reason about how processes work. This latter property suggests that LLMs could also be used to tackle process mining tasks that benefit from an understanding of process behavior. Examples of such tasks include (semantic) anomaly detection and next activity prediction, which both involve considerations of the meaning of activities and their interrelations. In this paper, we investigate the capabilities of LLMs to tackle such semantics-aware process mining tasks. Furthermore, whereas most works on the intersection of LLMs and process mining only focus on testing these models out of the box, we provide a more principled investigation of the utility of LLMs for process mining, including their ability to obtain process mining knowledge post-hoc by means of in-context learning and supervised fine-tuning. Concretely, we define three process mining tasks that benefit from an understanding of process semantics and provide extensive benchmarking datasets for each of them. Our evaluation experiments reveal that (1) LLMs fail to solve challenging process mining tasks out of the box and when provided only a handful of in-context examples, (2) but they yield strong performance when fine-tuned for these tasks, consistently surpassing smaller, encoder-based language models.

Digital news platforms use news recommenders as the main instrument to cater to the individual information needs of readers. Despite an increasingly language-diverse online community, in which many Internet users consume news in multiple languages, the majority of news recommendation focuses on major, resource-rich languages. Moreover, nearly all news recommendation efforts assume monolingual news consumption, whereas more and more users tend to consume information in at least two languages. Accordingly, the existing body of work on news recommendation suffers from a lack of publicly available multilingual benchmarks that would catalyze development of news recommenders effective in multilingual settings and for low-resource languages. Aiming to fill this gap, we introduce xMIND, an open, multilingual news recommendation dataset derived from the English MIND dataset using machine translation, covering a set of 14 linguistically and geographically diverse languages, with digital footprints of varying sizes. Using xMIND, we systematically benchmark several content-based neural news recommenders (NNRs) in zero-shot (ZS-XLT) and few-shot (FS-XLT) cross-lingual transfer scenarios, considering both monolingual and bilingual news consumption patterns. Our findings reveal that (i) current NNRs, even when based on a multilingual language model, suffer from substantial performance losses under ZS-XLT and that (ii) inclusion of target-language data in FS-XLT training has limited benefits, particularly when combined with a bilingual news consumption. Our findings thus warrant a broader research effort in multilingual and cross-lingual news recommendation. We release xMIND at https://github.com/andreeaiana/xMIND.

The advent of personalized news recommendation has given rise to increasingly complex recommender architectures. Most neural news recommenders rely on user click behavior and typically introduce dedicated user encoders that aggregate the content of clicked news into user embeddings (early fusion). These models are predominantly trained with standard point-wise classification objectives. The existing body of work exhibits two main shortcomings: (1) despite general design homogeneity, direct comparisons between models are hindered by varying evaluation datasets and protocols; (2) it leaves alternative model designs and training objectives vastly unexplored. In this work, we present a unified framework for news recommendation, allowing for a systematic and fair comparison of news recommenders across several crucial design dimensions: (i) candidate-awareness in user modeling, (ii) click behavior fusion, and (iii) training objectives. Our findings challenge the status quo in neural news recommendation. We show that replacing sizable user encoders with parameter-efficient dot products between candidate and clicked news embeddings (late fusion) often yields substantial performance gains. Moreover, our results render contrastive training a viable alternative to point-wise classification objectives.

Abstract Pretrained multilingual text encoders based on neural transformer architectures , such as multilingual BERT (mBERT) and XLM, have recently become a default paradigm for cross-lingual transfer of natural language processing models, rendering cross-lingual word embedding spaces (CLWEs) effectively obsolete. In this work we present a systematic empirical study focused on the suitability of the state-of-the-art multilingual encoders for cross-lingual document and sentence retrieval tasks across a number of diverse language pairs. We first treat these models as multilingual text encoders and benchmark their performance in unsupervised ad-hoc sentence- and document-level CLIR. In contrast to supervised language understanding, our results indicate that for unsupervised document-level CLIR—a setup with no relevance judgments for IR-specific fine-tuning—pretrained multilingual encoders on average fail to significantly outperform earlier models based on CLWEs. For sentence-level retrieval, we do obtain state-of-the-art performance: the peak scores, however, are met by multilingual encoders that have been further specialized, in a supervised fashion, for sentence understanding tasks, rather than using their vanilla ‘off-the-shelf’ variants. Following these results, we introduce localized relevance matching for document-level CLIR, where we independently score a query against document sections. In the second part, we evaluate multilingual encoders fine-tuned in a supervised fashion (i.e., we learn to rank ) on English relevance data in a series of zero-shot language and domain transfer CLIR experiments. Our results show that, despite the supervision, and due to the domain and language shift, supervised re-ranking rarely improves the performance of multilingual transformers as unsupervised base rankers. Finally, only with in-domain contrastive fine-tuning (i.e., same domain, only language transfer), we manage to improve the ranking quality. We uncover substantial empirical differences between cross-lingual retrieval results and results of (zero-shot) cross-lingual transfer for monolingual retrieval in target languages, which point to “monolingual overfitting” of retrieval models trained on monolingual (English) data, even if they are based on multilingual transformers.

Cross-lingual embeddings (CLE) facilitate cross-lingual natural language processing and information retrieval. Recently, a wide variety of resource-lean projection-based models for inducing CLEs has been introduced, requiring limited or no bilingual supervision. Despite potential usefulness in downstream IR and NLP tasks, these CLE models have almost exclusively been evaluated on word translation tasks. In this work, we provide a comprehensive comparative evaluation of projection-based CLE models for both sentence-level and document-level cross-lingual Information Retrieval (CLIR). We show that in some settings resource-lean CLE-based CLIR models may outperform resource-intensive models using full-blown machine translation (MT). We hope our work serves as a guideline for choosing the right model for CLIR practitioners.

We propose a fully unsupervised framework for ad-hoc cross-lingual information retrieval (CLIR) which requires no bilingual data at all. The framework leverages shared cross-lingual word embedding spaces in which terms, queries, and documents can be represented, irrespective of their actual language. The shared embedding spaces are induced solely on the basis of monolingual corpora in two languages through an iterative process based on adversarial neural networks. Our experiments on the standard CLEF CLIR collections for three language pairs of varying degrees of language similarity (English-Dutch/Italian/Finnish) demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed fully unsupervised approach. Our CLIR models with unsupervised cross-lingual embeddings outperform baselines that utilize cross-lingual embeddings induced relying on word-level and document-level alignments. We then demonstrate that further improvements can be achieved by unsupervised ensemble CLIR models. We believe that the proposed framework is the first step towards development of effective CLIR models for language pairs and domains where parallel data are scarce or non-existent.

Recent research has explored the use of Knowledge Bases (KBs) to represent documents as subgraphs of a KB concept graph and define metrics to characterize semantic relatedness of documents in terms of properties of the document concept graphs. However, none of the studies so far have examined to what degree such metrics capture a user-perceived relatedness of documents. Considering the users' explanations of how pairs of documents are related, the aim is to identify concepts in a KB graph that express the same notion of document relatedness. Our algorithm generates paths through the KB graph that originate from the terms in two documents. KB concepts where these paths intersect capture the semantic relatedness of the two starting terms and therefore the two documents. We consider how such intersecting concepts relate to the concepts in the users' explanations. The higher the users' concepts appear in the ranked list of intersecting concepts, the better the method in capturing the users' notion of document relatedness. Our experiments show that our approach outperforms a simpler graph method that uses properties of the concept nodes alone.