Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ruby C. Weng

dblp:50/25 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0001-5495-3817ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 65% Learning theory · 33% Multi-agent systems · 2%
Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Mathematical optimization · 75% Algorithms and data structures · 10% Coding theory · 10%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.232008
Trust Region Newton Method for Logistic Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Trust region Newton methods for large-scale logistic regression · ICML 2007
Ranking individuals by group comparisons · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
multiclass classification
0.232006
Generalized Bradley-Terry Models and Multi-Class Probability Estimates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006
Probability Estimates for Multi-class Classification by Pairwise Coupling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004
Probability Estimates for Multi-Class Classification by Pairwise Coupling · NIPS 2003
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.112011
A Bayesian Approximation Method for Online Ranking · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › class probability estimation
pairwise coupling
0.122004
Probability Estimates for Multi-class Classification by Pairwise Coupling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004
Probability Estimates for Multi-Class Classification by Pairwise Coupling · NIPS 2003
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
logistic regression
0.112008
Trust Region Newton Method for Logistic Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › generalized linear model
logistic regression
0.112007
Trust region Newton methods for large-scale logistic regression · ICML 2007
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods
newton's method
0.112007
Trust region Newton methods for large-scale logistic regression · ICML 2007
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction › ranking model
bradley-terry model
0.112006
Generalized Bradley-Terry Models and Multi-Class Probability Estimates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006
Information retrieval
ranking
0.112006
Ranking individuals by group comparisons · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.012004
Probability Estimates for Multi-class Classification by Pairwise Coupling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.012004
A Generalized Bradley-Terry Model: From Group Competition to Individual Skill · NIPS 2004
Algorithms and data structures › ranking
pairwise comparison ranking
0.012004
A Generalized Bradley-Terry Model: From Group Competition to Individual Skill · NIPS 2004
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
linear systems
0.012003
Probability Estimates for Multi-Class Classification by Pairwise Coupling · NIPS 2003
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
voting
0.012003
Probability Estimates for Multi-Class Classification by Pairwise Coupling · NIPS 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trust region newton method · 0.2quasi-newton method · 0.1linear SVM · 0.1pairwise coupling · 0.1bayesian approximation · 0.1exponential model · 0.1convex minimization · 0.1convergence analysis · 0.1bradley-terry model · 0.1newton method · 0.1maximum likelihood estimation · 0.1error-correcting output codes · 0.1probability estimation · 0.0linear system · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 A Bayesian Approximation Method for Online Ranking
Ruby C. Weng, Chih-Jen Lin
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2008 Trust Region Newton Method for Logistic Regression
Chih-Jen Lin, Ruby C. Weng, S. Sathiya Keerthi
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2007 Trust region Newton methods for large-scale logistic regression
abstract
Large-scale logistic regression arises in many applications such as document classification and natural language processing. In this paper, we apply a trust region Newton method to maximize the log-likelihood of the logistic regression model. The proposed method uses only approximate Newton steps in the beginning, but achieves fast convergence in the end. Experiments show that it is faster than the commonly used quasi Newton approach for logistic regression. We also compare it with linear SVM implementations.
Chih-Jen Lin, Ruby C. Weng, S. Sathiya Keerthi
ICML2
2007 A note on Platt's probabilistic outputs for support vector machines
Hsuan-Tien Lin, Chih-Jen Lin, Ruby C. Weng
Mach. Learn.3
2006 Ranking individuals by group comparisons
abstract
This paper proposes new approaches to rank individuals from their group competition results. Many real-world problems are of this type. For example, ranking players from team games is important in some sports. We propose an exponential model to solve such problems. To estimate individual rankings through the proposed model we introduce two convex minimization formulas with easy and efficient solution procedures. Experiments on real bridge records and multi-class classification demonstrate the viability of the proposed model.
Tzu-Kuo Huang, Chih-Jen Lin, Ruby C. Weng
ICML3
2006 Generalized Bradley-Terry Models and Multi-Class Probability Estimates
abstract
The Bradley-Terry model for obtaining individual skill from paired comparisons has been popular in many areas. In machine learning, this model is related to multi-class probability estimates by coupling all pairwise classification results. Error correcting output codes (ECOC) are a general framework to decompose a multi-class problem to several binary problems. To obtain probability estimates under this framework, this paper introduces a generalized Bradley-Terry model in which paired individual comparisons are extended to paired team comparisons. We propose a simple algorithm with convergence proofs to solve the model and obtain individual skill. Experiments on synthetic and re al data demonstrate that the algorithm is useful for obtaining multi-class probability estimates. Moreover, we discuss four extensions of the proposed model: 1) weighted individual skill, 2) home-field advantage, 3) ties, and 4) comparisons with more than two teams.
Tzu-Kuo Huang, Ruby C. Weng, Chih-Jen Lin
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2004 A Generalized Bradley-Terry Model: From Group Competition to Individual Skill
abstract
The Bradley-Terry model for paired comparison has been popular in many areas. We propose a generalized version in which paired individual comparisons are extended to paired team comparisons. We introduce a simple algorithm with convergence proofs to solve the model and obtain individual skill. A useful application to multi-class probability estimates using error-correcting codes is demonstrated.
Tzu-Kuo Huang, Chih-Jen Lin, Ruby C. Weng
NIPS3
2004 Probability Estimates for Multi-class Classification by Pairwise Coupling
Ting-Fan Wu, Chih-Jen Lin, Ruby C. Weng
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2003 Probability Estimates for Multi-Class Classification by Pairwise Coupling
abstract
Pairwise coupling is a popular multi-class classification method that combines together all pairwise comparisons for each pair of classes. This paper presents two approaches for obtaining class probabilities. Both methods can be reduced to linear systems and are easy to implement. We show conceptually and experimentally that the proposed approaches are more stable than two existing popular methods: voting and [3].
Ting-Fan Wu, Chih-Jen Lin, Ruby C. Weng
NIPS3