Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Avril Coghlan

dblp:50/5449 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0002-2775-5951ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
gene prediction
0.112007
Genomix: a method for combining gene-finders' predictions, which uses evolutionary conservation of sequence and intron-exon structure · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis
protein database search
0.012001
Representation of amino acids as five-bit or three-bit patterns for filtering protein databases · Bioinform. 2001
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis
protein sequence representation
0.012001
Representation of amino acids as five-bit or three-bit patterns for filtering protein databases · Bioinform. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

comparative genomics · 0.1simulated annealing · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 nGASP - the nematode genome annotation assessment project
abstract
BACKGROUND: While the C. elegans genome is extensively annotated, relatively little information is available for other Caenorhabditis species. The nematode genome annotation assessment project (nGASP) was launched to objectively assess the accuracy of protein-coding gene prediction software in C. elegans, and to apply this knowledge to the annotation of the genomes of four additional Caenorhabditis species and other nematodes. Seventeen groups worldwide participated in nGASP, and submitted 47 prediction sets across 10 Mb of the C. elegans genome. Predictions were compared to reference gene sets consisting of confirmed or manually curated gene models from WormBase. RESULTS: The most accurate gene-finders were 'combiner' algorithms, which made use of transcript- and protein-alignments and multi-genome alignments, as well as gene predictions from other gene-finders. Gene-finders that used alignments of ESTs, mRNAs and proteins came in second. There was a tie for third place between gene-finders that used multi-genome alignments and ab initio gene-finders. The median gene level sensitivity of combiners was 78% and their specificity was 42%, which is nearly the same accuracy reported for combiners in the human genome. C. elegans genes with exons of unusual hexamer content, as well as those with unusually many exons, short exons, long introns, a weak translation start signal, weak splice sites, or poorly conserved orthologs posed the greatest difficulty for gene-finders. CONCLUSION: This experiment establishes a baseline of gene prediction accuracy in Caenorhabditis genomes, and has guided the choice of gene-finders for the annotation of newly sequenced genomes of Caenorhabditis and other nematode species. We have created new gene sets for C. briggsae, C. remanei, C. brenneri, C. japonica, and Brugia malayi using some of the best-performing gene-finders.
Avril Coghlan, Tristan J. Fiedler, Sheldon J. McKay, Paul Flicek, Todd W. Harris, Darin Blasiar, Lincoln Stein
BMC Bioinform.1
2007 Genomix: a method for combining gene-finders' predictions, which uses evolutionary conservation of sequence and intron-exon structure
abstract
MOTIVATION: Correct gene predictions are crucial for most analyses of genomes. However, in the absence of transcript data, gene prediction is still challenging. One way to improve gene-finding accuracy in such genomes is to combine the exons predicted by several gene-finders, so that gene-finders that make uncorrelated errors can correct each other. RESULTS: We present a method for combining gene-finders called Genomix. Genomix selects the predicted exons that are best conserved within and/or between species in terms of sequence and intron-exon structure, and combines them into a gene structure. Genomix was used to combine predictions from four gene-finders for Caenorhabditis elegans, by selecting the predicted exons that are best conserved with C.briggsae and C.remanei. On a set of approximately 1500 confirmed C.elegans genes, Genomix increased the exon-level specificity by 10.1% and sensitivity by 2.7% compared to the best input gene-finder. AVAILABILITY: Scripts and Supplementary Material can be found at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/analysis/genomix
Avril Coghlan, Richard Durbin
Bioinform.1
2001 Representation of amino acids as five-bit or three-bit patterns for filtering protein databases
abstract
MOTIVATION: We propose representing amino acids by bit-patterns so they may be used in a filter algorithm for similarity searches over protein databases, to rapidly eliminate non-homologous regions of database sequences. The filter algorithm would be based on dynamic programming optimization. It would have the advantage over previous filter algorithms that its substitution scoring function distinguishes between conservative and non-conservative amino acid substitutions. RESULTS: Simulated annealing was used to search for the best five-bit or three-bit patterns to represent amino acids, where similar amino acids were given similar bit-patterns. The similarity between amino acids was estimated from the BLOSUM45 matrix. Representing amino acids by these five-bit and three-bit patterns, the Escherichia coli PhoE precursor and the bacteriophage PA2 LC precursor were aligned. The alignments were nearly the same as that obtained when BLOSUM45 was used to score substitutions. AVAILABILITY: The C code of the optimization algorithm for searching for the optimal bit-pattern representation of amino acids is available from the authors upon request.
Avril Coghlan, Dónall A. Mac Dónaill, Nigel H. Buttimore
Bioinform.1