VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alex Nizhner
dblp:50/7759
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 67% Distributed systems · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
distributed search |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Dynamic load balancing for distributed search · HPDC 2005 |
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Dynamic load balancing for distributed search · HPDC 2005 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › parallel algorithm design
parallel algorithm mapping |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Dynamic load balancing for distributed search · HPDC 2005 |
Information retrieval
content-based retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Dynamic load balancing for distributed search · HPDC 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic partitioning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Dynamic load balancing for distributed searchabstractThis paper examines how computation can be mapped across the nodes of a distributed search system to effectively utilize available resources. We specifically address computationally intensive search of complex data, such as content-based retrieval of digital images or sounds, where sophisticated algorithms must be evaluated on the objects of interest. Since these problems require significant computation, we distribute the search over a collection of compute nodes, such as active storage devices, intermediate processors and host computers. A key challenge with mapping the desired computation to the available resources is that the most efficient distribution depends on several factors: relative power and number of compute nodes; network bandwidth between the compute nodes; the cost of evaluating query predicates; and the selectivity of the given query. This wide range of variables renders manual partitioning of the computation infeasible, particularly since some of the parameters (e.g., available network bandwidth) can change during the course of a search. This paper proposes several techniques for dynamic partitioning of computation, and demonstrates that they can significantly improve efficiency for distributed search applications. Larry Huston, Alex Nizhner, Padmanabhan Pillai, Rahul Sukthankar, Peter Steenkiste |
HPDC | 2 |