Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zvi Ostfeld

dblp:51/5491 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2Theory of computation · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
3 papers
Transport protocols and congestion control · 59% Network optimization and economics · 41%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Transport protocols and congestion control
rate-based flow control
0.031996
Convergence Complexity of Optimistic Rate Based Flow Control Algorithms (Extended Abstract) · STOC 1996
Phantom: A Simple and Effective Flow Control Scheme · SIGCOMM 1996
On the Convergence Complexity of Optimistic Rate Based Flow Control Algorithms (Brief Announcement) · PODC 1996
Network optimization and economics
fairness
0.011996
Phantom: A Simple and Effective Flow Control Scheme · SIGCOMM 1996
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation › rate allocation
fair rate allocation
0.011996
Phantom: A Simple and Effective Flow Control Scheme · SIGCOMM 1996
Transport protocols and congestion control
flow control
0.011996
Phantom: A Simple and Effective Flow Control Scheme · SIGCOMM 1996
Network optimization and economics › fairness
max-min fairness
0.011996
Convergence Complexity of Optimistic Rate Based Flow Control Algorithms (Extended Abstract) · STOC 1996
Transport protocols and congestion control
TCP
0.011996
Phantom: A Simple and Effective Flow Control Scheme · SIGCOMM 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

flow control algorithms · 0.0convergence analysis · 0.0constant space algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Phantom: a simple and effective flow control scheme
Yehuda Afek, Yishay Mansour, Zvi Ostfeld
Comput. Networks3
1996 On the Convergence Complexity of Optimistic Rate Based Flow Control Algorithms (Brief Announcement)
abstract
No abstract available.
Yehuda Afek, Yishay Mansour, Zvi Ostfeld
PODC3
1996 Phantom: A Simple and Effective Flow Control Scheme
abstract
This paper presents Phantom, a simple constant space algorithm for rate based flow control. As shown by our simulations, it converges fast to a fair rate allocation while generating a moderate queue length. While our approach can be easily implemented in ATM switches for managing ABR traffic, it is also suitable for flow control in TCP router based networks. Both the introduced overhead and the required modifications in TCP flow control systems are minimal. The implementation of this approach in TCP guarantees fairness and provides a unifying interconnection between TCP routers and ATM networks. The new algorithm easily inter-operates with current TCP flow control mechanisms and thus can be gradually introduced into installed based TCP networks.
Yehuda Afek, Yishay Mansour, Zvi Ostfeld
SIGCOMM3
1996 Convergence Complexity of Optimistic Rate Based Flow Control Algorithms (Extended Abstract)
abstract
This paper studies basic properties of rate based flowcontrol algorithms and of the max-min fairness criteria.For the algorithms we suggest a new approach for their mod cling and analysis, which may be considered more "optimistic" and realistic than traditional approaches.Three variations of the approach are presented and their rate of convergence to an optimal max-min fairness solution is analyzed.In addition, we introduce and analyze approximate rate based flow control algorithms.We show that under certain conditions the approximate algorithms may converge faster.However, we show that the resulting flows may be substantially different than the tlows according to the max-min fairness.We further demonstrate that the max-min fairness solution can be very sensitive to small changes, i.e., there are configurations in which an addition or deletion of a session with rate 8 may change the allocation of another session by Cl(c$ .2~), but by no more than 0(6 .2W).This implies that it might be hard to locally estimate in a given state how close a session is to its max-min fair allocation.
Yehuda Afek, Yishay Mansour, Zvi Ostfeld
STOC3
1988 DFS Tree Construction: Algorithms and Characterizations
Ephraim Korach, Zvi Ostfeld
WG2