Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

K. L. Krause

dblp:51/5700 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1977
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Parallel and multicore computing · 74% Performance modeling and evaluation · 26%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing
task scheduling
0.021975
Analysis of Several Task-Scheduling Algorithms for a Model of Multiprogramming Computer Systems · J. ACM 1975
A Task Scheduling Algorithm for a Multiprogramming Computer System · SOSP 1973
Parallel and multicore computing
scheduling algorithms
0.011975
Analysis of Several Task-Scheduling Algorithms for a Model of Multiprogramming Computer Systems · J. ACM 1975
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel scheduling
0.011973
A Task Scheduling Algorithm for a Multiprogramming Computer System · SOSP 1973
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.011973
A Task Scheduling Algorithm for a Multiprogramming Computer System · SOSP 1973

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

worst-case analysis · 0.0simulation · 0.0look-ahead heuristic · 0.0deterministic analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1977 Errata: "Analysis of Several Task-Scheduling Algorithms for a Model of Multiprogramming Computer Systems"
abstract
No abstract available.
K. L. Krause, Vincent Y. Shen, Herb Schwetman
J. ACM1
1975 Analysis of Several Task-Scheduling Algorithms for a Model of Multiprogramming Computer Systems
abstract
ABST~tACT.In multiprogramming computer systems, the scheduling strategy used to select tasks to be activated is an important factor in the achievement of the performance goals of the system.One form of analysm of scheduling algorithms represents the system as an abstract model of computation and then formally analyzes the algorithms operating in the context of the model.This paper presents an abstract system model which consists of several identical and independent task processors and a memory of arbitrary size Tasks are represented by processing-time and memory requirements which must be met by the model.Worst-case performance bounds are derived for sever al simple scheduling algortthms.A new heuristic algorithm, which uses a look-ahead strategy, is introduced This algorithm is shown to be better in many cases than the simpler algorithms when the worst-case performance bounds are compared.
K. L. Krause, Vincent Y. Shen, Herb Schwetman
J. ACM1
1973 A Task Scheduling Algorithm for a Multiprogramming Computer System
abstract
This paper presents a description and analysis of a task scheduling algorithm which is applicable to third generation computer systems. The analysis is carried out using a model of a computer system having several identical task processors and a fixed amount of memory. The algorithm schedules tasks having different processor-time and memory requirements. The goal of the algorithm is to produce a task schedule which is near optimal in terms of the time required to process all of the tasks. An upper bound on the length of this schedule is the result of deterministic analysis of the algorithm. Computer simulations demonstrate the applicability of the algorithm in actual systems, even when some of the basic assumptions are violated.
K. L. Krause, Vincent Y. Shen, Herb Schwetman
SOSP1