Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leliane Nunes de Barros

dblp:51/6275 · also Leliane N. de Barros · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
25ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9128-0188ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 19 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Theory of computation · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Reinforcement learning · 58% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 34% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 6%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.842016
Real-time dynamic programming for Markov decision processes with imprecise probabilities · Artif. Intell. 2016
Real-Time Symbolic Dynamic Programming · AAAI 2015
Robust Optimization for Hybrid MDPs with State-Dependent Noise · IJCAI 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy search
0.412019
Deep Reactive Policies for Planning in Stochastic Nonlinear Domains · AAAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning
0.412019
Deep Reactive Policies for Planning in Stochastic Nonlinear Domains · AAAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
real-time dynamic programming
0.212016
Real-time dynamic programming for Markov decision processes with imprecise probabilities · Artif. Intell. 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
symbolic dynamic programming
0.212015
Real-Time Symbolic Dynamic Programming · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
factored MDP
0.112011
Efficient solutions to factored MDPs with imprecise transition probabilities · Artif. Intell. 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
imprecise probability
0.122016
Real-time dynamic programming for Markov decision processes with imprecise probabilities · Artif. Intell. 2016
Efficient solutions to factored MDPs with imprecise transition probabilities · Artif. Intell. 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.112007
Planning under Risk and Knightian Uncertainty · IJCAI 2007
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › decision theory
decision making under uncertainty
0.112007
Planning under Risk and Knightian Uncertainty · IJCAI 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge acquisition
0.011997
Par-KAP: a Knowledge Acquisition Tool for Building Practical Planning Systems · IJCAI 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic computation graph · 0.4reparameterization · 0.4gradient descent · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4real-time dynamic programming · 0.2imprecise probability · 0.2symbolic dynamic programming · 0.2extended algebraic decision diagram · 0.2robust optimization · 0.2planning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Planning for Temporally Extended Goals based on alpha-CTL
Viviane Bonadia dos Santos, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Maria Viviane de Menezes, Silvio do Lago Pereira
AAMAS2
2021 Efficient algorithms for Risk-Sensitive Markov Decision Processes with limited budget
abstract
We tackle the problem of finding optimal policies for Markov Decision Processes, that minimize the probability of the cumulative cost exceeding a given budget. Such task falls under the umbrella of Risk-Sensitive Markov Decision Processes, which optimize a non-additive, non-linear function of cumulative cost that incorporates the user's attitude towards risk. Current algorithms for solving that task, for any budget equal or smaller than an user-defined budget, scale poorly when the support of the cost function is large, since they operate in an augmented state space which enumerates all possible remaining budgets. To circumvent this issue, we develop (i) an improved version of the Topological Value Iteration with Dynamic Programming algorithm (tvi-dp), and (ii) the first symbolic dynamic programming algorithm for this class of problems, called rs-spudd, that exploits conditional independence in the transition function in the augmented state space. The proposed algorithms improve efficiency by pruning irrelevant states and terminating early, without sacrificing optimality. Empirical results show that rs-spudd is able to solve problems up to 103 times larger than tvi-dp.
Daniel A. M. Moreira, Karina Valdivia Delgado, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Denis Deratani Mauá
Int. J. Approx. Reason.3
2020 Human-aware Contingent Planning
abstract
Contingent planning models a robot that must achieve a goal in a partially observable environment with non-deterministic actions. A solution for this problem is generated by searching in the space of belief states , where a belief state is a set of p
Ignasi Andrés, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Karina Valdivia Delgado
Fundam. Informaticae2
2019 Deep Reactive Policies for Planning in Stochastic Nonlinear Domains
abstract
Recent advances in applying deep learning to planning have shown that Deep Reactive Policies (DRPs) can be powerful for fast decision-making in complex environments. However, an important limitation of current DRP-based approaches is either the need of optimal planners to be used as ground truth in a supervised learning setting or the sample complexity of high-variance policy gradient estimators, which are particularly troublesome in continuous state-action domains. In order to overcome those limitations, we introduce a framework for training DRPs in continuous stochastic spaces via gradient-based policy search. The general approach is to explicitly encode a parametric policy as a deep neural network, and to formulate the probabilistic planning problem as an optimization task in a stochastic computation graph by exploiting the re-parameterization of the transition probability densities; the optimization is then solved by leveraging gradient descent algorithms that are able to handle non-convex objective functions. We benchmark our approach against stochastic planning domains exhibiting arbitrary differentiable nonlinear transition and cost functions (e.g., Reservoir Control, HVAC and Navigation). Results show that DRPs with more than 125,000 continuous action parameters can be optimized by our approach for problems with 30 state fluents and 30 action fluents on inexpensive hardware under 6 minutes. Also, we observed a speedup of 5 orders of magnitude in the average inference time per decision step of DRPs when compared to other state-of-the-art online gradient-based planners when the same level of solution quality is required.
Thiago Pereira Bueno, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Denis Deratani Mauá, Scott Sanner
AAAI2
2019 Robust topological policy iteration for infinite horizon bounded Markov Decision Processes
Willy Arthur Silva Reis, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Karina Valdivia Delgado
Int. J. Approx. Reason.2
2016 Real-time dynamic programming for Markov decision processes with imprecise probabilities
Karina Valdivia Delgado, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Daniel B. Dias, Scott Sanner
Artif. Intell.2
2016 Robust probabilistic planning with ilao
Daniel A. M. Moreira, Karina Valdivia Delgado, Leliane Nunes de Barros
Appl. Intell.3
2015 Real-Time Symbolic Dynamic Programming
abstract
Recent advances in Symbolic Dynamic Programming (SDP) combined withthe extended algebraic decision diagram (XADD) have provided exactsolutions for expressive subclasses of finite-horizon Hybrid MarkovDecision Processes (HMDPs) with mixed continuous and discrete stateand action parameters. Unfortunately, SDP suffers from two majordrawbacks: (1) it solves for all states and can be intractable formany problems that inherently have large optimal XADD value functionrepresentations; and (2) it cannot maintain compact (pruned) XADDrepresentations for domains with nonlinear dynamics and reward due tothe need for nonlinear constraint checking. In this work, wesimultaneously address both of these problems by introducing real-timeSDP (RTSDP). RTSDP addresses (1) by focusing the solution and valuerepresentation only on regions reachable from a set of initial statesand RTSDP addresses (2) by using visited states as witnesses ofreachable regions to assist in pruning irrelevant or unreachable(nonlinear) regions of the value function. To this end, RTSDP enjoysprovable convergence over the set of initial states and substantialspace and time savings over SDP as we demonstrate in a variety of hybrid domains ranging from inventory to reservoir to traffic control.
Luis Gustavo Vianna, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Scott Sanner
AAAI2
2015 Learning to program using hierarchical model-based debugging
Leliane Nunes de Barros, Wellington Ricardo Pinheiro, Karina Valdivia Delgado
Appl. Intell.1
2014 On the revision of planning tasks
abstract
When a planning task cannot be solved then it can often be made solvable by modifying it a bit: one may change either the set of actions, or the initial state, or the goal description. We show that modification of actions can be reduced to initial state modification. We then apply Katsuno and Mendelzon's distinction between update and revision and show that the modification of the initial state is an update and the modification of the goal description is a revision. We consider variants of Forbus's update and Dalal's revision operation and argue that existing belief change operations do not apply as they stand because their inputs are boolean formulas, while plan task modification involves counterfactual statements. We show that they can be captured in Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments DL-PA.
Andreas Herzig, Maria Viviane de Menezes, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Renata Wassermann
ECAI3
2013 Robust Optimization for Hybrid MDPs with State-Dependent Noise
Zahra Zamani, Scott Sanner, Karina Valdivia Delgado, Leliane Nunes de Barros
IJCAI4
2013 Bounded Approximate Symbolic Dynamic Programming for Hybrid MDPs
Luis Gustavo Vianna, Scott Sanner, Leliane Nunes de Barros
UAI3
2011 Model Update for Automated Planning
Maria Viviane de Menezes, Leliane Nunes de Barros
AAAI2
2011 Symbolic Dynamic Programming for Discrete and Continuous State MDPs
Scott Sanner, Karina Valdivia Delgado, Leliane Nunes de Barros
UAI3
2011 Efficient solutions to factored MDPs with imprecise transition probabilities
Karina Valdivia Delgado, Scott Sanner, Leliane Nunes de Barros
Artif. Intell.3
2011 Using mathematical programming to solve Factored Markov Decision Processes with Imprecise Probabilities
Karina Valdivia Delgado, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Fábio G. Cozman, Scott Sanner
Int. J. Approx. Reason.2
2008 Using alpha-ctl to Specify Complex Planning Goals
Silvio do Lago Pereira, Leliane Nunes de Barros
WoLLIC2
2008 A logic-based agent that plans for extended reachability goals
Silvio do Lago Pereira, Leliane Nunes de Barros
Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst.2
2007 Planning under Risk and Knightian Uncertainty
Felipe W. Trevizan, Fábio G. Cozman, Leliane Nunes de Barros
IJCAI3
2005 Intelligent mobile multi-robotic systems: some challenges and possible solutions
Flávio S. Corrêa da Silva, Renata Wassermann, Ana Cristina Vieira de Melo, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Marcelo Finger
ICINCO4
2004 ProPAT: A Programming ITS Based on Pedagogical Patterns
Karina Valdivia Delgado, Leliane Nunes de Barros
Intelligent Tutoring Systems2
2000 The Nature of Knowledge in an Abductive Event Calculus Planner
Leliane Nunes de Barros, Paulo E. Santos
EKAW1
2000 Network fault diagnosis: a model based approach
abstract
This paper presents a model-based approach to fault diagnosis in computer networks. The idea behind a model-based diagnosis is to have a complete description of the local area network: the topology, type of equipment, routing tables, and so on. With this information and the knowledge of how IP packages travel in the network, one is able to perform a model-based reasoning for this network.
Jacques Wainer, Leliane Nunes de Barros, Volnys Borges Bernal, Marilza Lemos
NOMS2
1998 A library of system-derived problem-solving methods for plannin
André Valente, V. Richard Benjamins, Leliane Nunes de Barros
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.3
1997 Par-KAP: a Knowledge Acquisition Tool for Building Practical Planning Systems
Leliane Nunes de Barros, James A. Hendler, V. Richard Benjamins
IJCAI1