VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tong Wang 0015
dblp:51/6856-15
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0004-9101-4973ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 53% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% Trustworthy machine learning · 11% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › robust object detection
long-tailed object detection |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | C2AM Loss: Chasing a Better Decision Boundary for Long-Tail Object Detection · CVPR 2022 Adaptive Class Suppression Loss for Long-Tail Object Detection · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Adaptive Class Suppression Loss for Long-Tail Object Detection · CVPR 2021 Large Batch Optimization for Object Detection: Training COCO in 12 minutes · ECCV (21) 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Adaptive Class Suppression Loss for Long-Tail Object Detection · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Adaptive Class Suppression Loss for Long-Tail Object Detection · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
detector training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Large Batch Optimization for Object Detection: Training COCO in 12 minutes · ECCV (21) 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › large-scale optimization
large batch optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Large Batch Optimization for Object Detection: Training COCO in 12 minutes · ECCV (21) 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
large-batch training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Large Batch Optimization for Object Detection: Training COCO in 12 minutes · ECCV (21) 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
adaptive loss |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Adaptive Class Suppression Loss for Long-Tail Object Detection · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Adaptive Class Suppression Loss for Long-Tail Object Detection · CVPR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cosine similarity · 0.6angular margin loss · 0.6gradient suppression · 0.5adaptive class suppression loss · 0.5large batch optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | C2AM Loss: Chasing a Better Decision Boundary for Long-Tail Object DetectionabstractLong-tail object detection suffers from poor performance on tail categories. We reveal that the real culprit lies in the extremely imbalanced distribution of the classifier's weight norm. For conventional softmax cross-entropy loss, such imbalanced weight norm distribution yields ill conditioned decision boundary for categories which have small weight norms. To get rid of this situation, we choose to maxi-mize the cosine similarity between the learned feature and the weight vector of target category rather than the inner-product of them. The decision boundary between any two categories is the angular bisector of their weight vectors. Whereas, the absolutely equal decision boundary is sub-optimal because it reduces the model's sensitivity to vari-ous categories. Intuitively, categories with rich data diver-sity should occupy a larger area in the classification space while categories with limited data diversity should occupy a slightly small space. Hence, we devise a Category-Aware Angular Margin Loss (C2AM Loss) to introduce an adaptive angular margin between any two categories. Specif-ically, the margin between two categories is proportional to the ratio of their classifiers' weight norms. As a result, the decision boundary is slightly pushed towards the cat-egory which has a smaller weight norm. We conduct comprehensive experiments on LVIS dataset. C2AM Loss brings 4.9~5.2 AP improvements on different detectors and back-bones compared with baseline. Tong Wang 0015, Yousong Zhu, Yingying Chen 0003, Chaoyang Zhao, Jinqiao Wang, Ming Tang 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2021 | Adaptive Class Suppression Loss for Long-Tail Object DetectionabstractTo address the problem of long-tail distribution for the large vocabulary object detection task, existing methods usually divide the whole categories into several groups and treat each group with different strategies. These methods bring the following two problems. One is the training inconsistency between adjacent categories of similar sizes, and the other is that the learned model is lack of discrimination for tail categories which are semantically similar to some of the head categories. In this paper, we devise a novel Adaptive Class Suppression Loss (ACSL) to effectively tackle the above problems and improve the detection performance of tail categories. Specifically, we introduce a statistic-free perspective to analyze the long-tail distribution, breaking the limitation of manual grouping. According to this perspective, our ACSL adjusts the suppression gradients for each sample of each class adaptively, ensuring the training consistency and boosting the discrimination for rare categories. Extensive experiments on long-tail datasets LVIS and Open Images show that the our ACSL achieves 5.18% and 5.2% improvements with ResNet50-FPN, and sets a new state of the art. Code and models are available at https://github.com/CASIA-IVA-Lab/ACSL. Tong Wang 0015, Yousong Zhu, Chaoyang Zhao, Wei Zeng 0006, Jinqiao Wang, Ming Tang 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2021 | Attention-Guided Knowledge Distillation for Efficient Single-Stage DetectorabstractKnowledge distillation has been successfully applied in image classification for model acceleration. There are also some works employing this technique to object detection, but they all treat different feature regions equally when performing feature mimic. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end attention-guided knowledge distillation method to train efficient single-stage detectors with much smaller backbones. More specifically, we introduce an attention mechanism to prioritize the transfer of important knowledge by focusing on a sparse set of hard samples, leading to a more thorough distillation process. In addition, the proposed distillation method also provides an easy way to train efficient detectors without tedious ImageNet pre-training procedure. Extensive experiments on PASCAL VOC and CityPersons datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. We achieve 57.96% and 69.48% mAP on VOC07 with the backbone of 1/8 VGG16 and 1/4 VGG16, greatly outperforming their ImageNet pre-trained counterparts by 11.7% and 7.1% respectively. Tong Wang 0015, Yousong Zhu, Chaoyang Zhao, Xu Zhao 0003, Jinqiao Wang, Ming Tang 0001 |
ICME | 1 |
| 2020 | Large Batch Optimization for Object Detection: Training COCO in 12 minutes
Tong Wang 0015, Yousong Zhu, Chaoyang Zhao, Wei Zeng 0006, Yaowei Wang 0001, Jinqiao Wang, Ming Tang 0001 |
ECCV (21) | 1 |
| 2020 | A novel data augmentation scheme for pedestrian detection with attribute preserving GAN
Songyan Liu, Haiyun Guo, Jian-Guo Hu, Xu Zhao 0003, Chaoyang Zhao, Tong Wang 0015, Yousong Zhu, Jinqiao Wang, Ming Tang 0001 |
Neurocomputing | 6 |