Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hervé Gagnon
dblp:51/6927
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing › registration
3d registration |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Towards a General Multi-View Registration Technique · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996 |
Geometric modeling and processing › registration › 3d registration
multi-view registration |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Towards a General Multi-View Registration Technique · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1996 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling
3d modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Registration of multiple range views for automatic 3-D model building · CVPR 1994 |
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Registration of multiple range views for automatic 3-D model building · CVPR 1994 |
Geometric modeling and processing › point cloud processing › range image processing
range image registration |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Registration of multiple range views for automatic 3-D model building · CVPR 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iterated closest point · 0.0transformation matrix refinement · 0.0simultaneous registration · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Towards a General Multi-View Registration TechniqueabstractWe present an algorithm that reduces significantly the level of the registration errors between all pairs in a set of range views. This algorithm refines initial estimates of the transformation matrices obtained from either the calibrated acquisition setup or a crude manual alignment. It is an instance of a category of registration algorithms known as iterated closest-point (ICP) algorithms. The algorithm considers the network of views as a whole and minimizes the registration errors of all views simultaneously. This leads to a well-balanced network of views in which the registration errors are equally distributed, an objective not met by previously published ICP algorithms which all process the views sequentially. Experimental results show that this refinement technique improves the calibrated registrations and the quality of the integrated model for complex multi-part objects. In the case of scenes comprising man-made objects of very simple shapes, the basic algorithm faces problems common to all ICP algorithms and so must be extended. Robert Bergevin, Marc Soucy, Hervé Gagnon, Denis Laurendeau |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |
| 1994 | Registration of multiple range views for automatic 3-D model buildingabstractBuilding integrated models of existing 3-D objects is a key requirement for both reverse engineering and object recognition systems. An automatic 3-D model builder goes through three main steps: i) surface sampling from many views, ii) registration of the sampled views, and iii) integration of the registered views. The accuracy obtained depends on the acquisition and registration errors. The latter is critical since a misalignment of the range views causes their noise distributions to be centered around different means, which makes it difficult to reduce the effect of the acquisition error by simple averaging. In this paper, we propose a general algorithm that reduces significantly the level of the registration errors between all pairs in a set of range views. This algorithm refines initial estimates of the transformation matrices obtained from the calibrated acquisition setup. It considers the network of views as a whole and minimizes the registration errors of all views simultaneously. This leads to a well-balanced network of views in which the registration errors are equally distributed. Experimental results show an improvement of both the calibrated registrations and integrated models.> Hervé Gagnon, Marc Soucy, Robert Bergevin, Denis Laurendeau |
CVPR | 1 |