Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thibault Helleputte

dblp:51/7055 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-3795-3035ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 60% Computational science and engineering · 40%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery
0.112010
Robust biomarker identification for cancer diagnosis with ensemble feature selection methods · Bioinform. 2010
Computational science and engineering › ensemble learning
ensemble feature selection
0.112010
Robust biomarker identification for cancer diagnosis with ensemble feature selection methods · Bioinform. 2010
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.112009
Partially supervised feature selection with regularized linear models · ICML 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene selection
0.012009
Partially supervised feature selection with regularized linear models · ICML 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.012009
Partially supervised feature selection with regularized linear models · ICML 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.3sparsity regularization · 0.2regularized linear model · 0.2ensemble methods · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Machine learning in the biopharma industry
Gaël de Lannoy, Thibault Helleputte, Paul Smyth
ESANN2
2010 Expectation Propagation for Bayesian Multi-task Feature Selection
Daniel Hernández-Lobato, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Thibault Helleputte, Pierre Dupont
ECML/PKDD (1)3
2010 Robust biomarker identification for cancer diagnosis with ensemble feature selection methods
abstract
MOTIVATION: Biomarker discovery is an important topic in biomedical applications of computational biology, including applications such as gene and SNP selection from high-dimensional data. Surprisingly, the stability with respect to sampling variation or robustness of such selection processes has received attention only recently. However, robustness of biomarkers is an important issue, as it may greatly influence subsequent biological validations. In addition, a more robust set of markers may strengthen the confidence of an expert in the results of a selection method. RESULTS: Our first contribution is a general framework for the analysis of the robustness of a biomarker selection algorithm. Secondly, we conducted a large-scale analysis of the recently introduced concept of ensemble feature selection, where multiple feature selections are combined in order to increase the robustness of the final set of selected features. We focus on selection methods that are embedded in the estimation of support vector machines (SVMs). SVMs are powerful classification models that have shown state-of-the-art performance on several diagnosis and prognosis tasks on biological data. Their feature selection extensions also offered good results for gene selection tasks. We show that the robustness of SVMs for biomarker discovery can be substantially increased by using ensemble feature selection techniques, while at the same time improving upon classification performances. The proposed methodology is evaluated on four microarray datasets showing increases of up to almost 30% in robustness of the selected biomarkers, along with an improvement of approximately 15% in classification performance. The stability improvement with ensemble methods is particularly noticeable for small signature sizes (a few tens of genes), which is most relevant for the design of a diagnosis or prognosis model from a gene signature. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Thomas Abeel, Thibault Helleputte, Yves Van de Peer, Pierre Dupont, Yvan Saeys
Bioinform.2
2009 Partially supervised feature selection with regularized linear models
abstract
This paper addresses feature selection techniques for classification of high dimensional data, such as those produced by microarray experiments. Some prior knowledge may be available in this context to bias the selection towards some dimensions (genes) a priori assumed to be more relevant. We propose a feature selection method making use of this partial supervision. It extends previous works on embedded feature selection with linear models including regularization to enforce sparsity. A practical approximation of this technique reduces to standard SVM learning with iterative rescaling of the inputs. The scaling factors depend here on the prior knowledge but the final selection may depart from it. Practical results on several microarray data sets show the benefits of the proposed approach in terms of the stability of the selected gene lists with improved classification performances.
Thibault Helleputte, Pierre Dupont
ICML1
2009 Feature Selection by Transfer Learning with Linear Regularized Models
Thibault Helleputte, Pierre Dupont
ECML/PKDD (1)1