Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

R. Matthew Ward

dblp:51/7063 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0009-0005-1715-8597ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112012
SEQanswers: an open access community for collaboratively decoding genomes · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.112012
SEQanswers: an open access community for collaboratively decoding genomes · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
enzyme function prediction
0.112009
Evolutionary Trace Annotation Server: automated enzyme function prediction in protein structures using 3D templates · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
high-throughput sequencing
0.012012
SEQanswers: an open access community for collaboratively decoding genomes · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis
protein structure annotation
0.012009
Evolutionary Trace Annotation Server: automated enzyme function prediction in protein structures using 3D templates · Bioinform. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

phylogenetic analysis · 0.1evolutionary trace · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 SEQanswers: an open access community for collaboratively decoding genomes
abstract
Abstract Summary: The affordability of high-throughput sequencing has created an unprecedented surge in the use of genomic data in basic, translational and clinical research. The rapid evolution of sequencing technology, coupled with its broad adoption across biology and medicine, necessitates fast, collaborative interdisciplinary discussion. SEQanswers provides a real-time knowledge-sharing resource to address this need, covering experimental and computational aspects of sequencing and sequence analysis. Developers of popular analysis tools are among the >4000 active members, and ~40 peer-reviewed publications have referenced SEQanswers. Availability: The SEQanswers community is freely accessible at http://SEQanswers.com/ Contact: [email protected]; [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Jing-Woei Li, Robert Schmieder, R. Matthew Ward, Joann Delenick, Eric C. Olivares, David Mittelman
Bioinform.3
2009 Evolutionary Trace Annotation Server: automated enzyme function prediction in protein structures using 3D templates
abstract
SUMMARY: The Evolutionary Trace Annotation (ETA) Server predicts enzymatic activity. ETA starts with a structure of unknown function, such as those from structural genomics, and with no prior knowledge of its mechanism uses the phylogenetic Evolutionary Trace (ET) method to extract key functional residues and propose a function-associated 3D motif, called a 3D template. ETA then searches previously annotated structures for geometric template matches that suggest molecular and thus functional mimicry. In order to maximize the predictive value of these matches, ETA next applies distinctive specificity filters -- evolutionary similarity, function plurality and match reciprocity. In large scale controls on enzymes, prediction coverage is 43% but the positive predictive value rises to 92%, thus minimizing false annotations. Users may modify any search parameter, including the template. ETA thus expands the ET suite for protein structure annotation, and can contribute to the annotation efforts of metaservers. AVAILABILITY: The ETA Server is a web application available at (http://mammoth.bcm.tmc.edu/eta/).
R. Matthew Ward, Eric Venner, Bryce Daines, Stephen Murray, Serkan Erdin, David M. Kristensen, Olivier Lichtarge
Bioinform.1
2008 Prediction of enzyme function based on 3D templates of evolutionarily important amino acids
abstract
BACKGROUND: Structural genomics projects such as the Protein Structure Initiative (PSI) yield many new structures, but often these have no known molecular functions. One approach to recover this information is to use 3D templates - structure-function motifs that consist of a few functionally critical amino acids and may suggest functional similarity when geometrically matched to other structures. Since experimentally determined functional sites are not common enough to define 3D templates on a large scale, this work tests a computational strategy to select relevant residues for 3D templates. RESULTS: Based on evolutionary information and heuristics, an Evolutionary Trace Annotation (ETA) pipeline built templates for 98 enzymes, half taken from the PSI, and sought matches in a non-redundant structure database. On average each template matched 2.7 distinct proteins, of which 2.0 share the first three Enzyme Commission digits as the template's enzyme of origin. In many cases (61%) a single most likely function could be predicted as the annotation with the most matches, and in these cases such a plurality vote identified the correct function with 87% accuracy. ETA was also found to be complementary to sequence homology-based annotations. When matches are required to both geometrically match the 3D template and to be sequence homologs found by BLAST or PSI-BLAST, the annotation accuracy is greater than either method alone, especially in the region of lower sequence identity where homology-based annotations are least reliable. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that knowledge of evolutionarily important residues improves functional annotation among distant enzyme homologs. Since, unlike other 3D template approaches, the ETA method bypasses the need for experimental knowledge of the catalytic mechanism, it should prove a useful, large scale, and general adjunct to combine with other methods to decipher protein function in the structural proteome.
David M. Kristensen, R. Matthew Ward, Andreas Martin Lisewski, Serkan Erdin, Brian Y. Chen, Viacheslav Fofanov, Marek Kimmel, Lydia E. Kavraki, Olivier Lichtarge
BMC Bioinform.2