Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard Steiger

dblp:52/1321 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1973
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Concurrent programming · 75% Empirical software engineering · 25%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Multi-agent systems · 77% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Concurrent programming › concurrency models
actor model
0.011973
Actor Induction and Meta-Evaluation · POPL 1973
Concurrent programming
concurrency models
0.011973
A Universal Modular ACTOR Formalism for Artificial Intelligence · IJCAI 1973
Concurrent programming
message passing
0.011973
Actor Induction and Meta-Evaluation · POPL 1973
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
meta-evaluation
0.011973
Actor Induction and Meta-Evaluation · POPL 1973

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

actor model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1973 A Universal Modular ACTOR Formalism for Artificial Intelligence
Carl Hewitt, Peter Boehler Bishop, Richard Steiger
IJCAI3
1973 Actor Induction and Meta-Evaluation
abstract
The PLANNER project is continuing research in natural and effective means for embedding knowledge in procedures. In the course of this work we have succeeded in unifying the formalism around one fundamental concept: the ACTOR. Intuitively, an ACTOR is an active agent which plays a role on cue according to a script. We use the ACTOR metaphor to emphasize the inseparability of control and data flow in our model. Data structures, functions, semaphores, monitors, ports, descriptions, Quillian nets, logical formulae, numbers, identifiers, demons, processes, contexts, and data bases can all be shown to be special cases of actors. All of the above are objects with certain useful modes of behavior. Our formalism shows how all of these modes of behavior can be defined in terms of one kind of behavior: sending messages to actors. An actor is always invoked uniformly in exactly the same way regardless of whether it behaves as a recursive function, data structure, or process.
Carl Hewitt, Peter Boehler Bishop, Irene Greif, Brian Cantwell Smith, Todd Matson, Richard Steiger
POPL6