Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrean Goede

dblp:52/2725 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0000-0002-9044-9869ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 8 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 95% Computational science and engineering · 5%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis
0.132003
Inhomogeneous molecular density: reference packing densities and distribution of cavities within proteins · Bioinform. 2003
Accelerating screening of 3D protein data with a graph theoretical approach · Bioinform. 2003
Homonyms and synonyms in the Dictionary of Interfaces in Proteins (DIP) · Bioinform. 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery
0.112005
SuperDrug: a conformational drug database · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
protein structure and function
0.012003
Accelerating screening of 3D protein data with a graph theoretical approach · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis
structural similarity search
0.011999
Homonyms and synonyms in the Dictionary of Interfaces in Proteins (DIP) · Bioinform. 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
anatomical therapeutic chemical classification
0.012005
SuperDrug: a conformational drug database · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
0.012003
Inhomogeneous molecular density: reference packing densities and distribution of cavities within proteins · Bioinform. 2003
Computational science and engineering › computational geometry
voronoi tessellation
0.012003
Inhomogeneous molecular density: reference packing densities and distribution of cavities within proteins · Bioinform. 2003
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › probabilistic combinatorics
random graph theory
0.012003
Accelerating screening of 3D protein data with a graph theoretical approach · Bioinform. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random graph theory · 0.13d superposition · 0.1tanimoto coefficient · 0.12d similarity screening · 0.1voronoi tessellation · 0.0sequence-independent structural alignment · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 SuperMimic - Fitting peptide mimetics into protein structures
abstract
BACKGROUND: Various experimental techniques yield peptides that are biologically active but have unfavourable pharmacological properties. The design of structurally similar organic compounds, i.e. peptide mimetics, is a challenging field in medicinal chemistry. RESULTS: SuperMimic identifies compounds that mimic parts of a protein, or positions in proteins that are suitable for inserting mimetics. The application provides libraries that contain peptidomimetic building blocks on the one hand and protein structures on the other. The search for promising peptidomimetic linkers for a given peptide is based on the superposition of the peptide with several conformers of the mimetic. New synthetic elements or proteins can be imported and used for searching. CONCLUSION: We present a graphical user interface for finding peptide mimetics that can be inserted into a protein or for fitting small molecules into a protein. Using SuperMimic, promising locations in proteins for the insertion of mimetics can be found quickly and conveniently.
Andrean Goede, Elke Michalsky, Ulrike Schmidt 0001, Robert Preissner
BMC Bioinform.1
2006 Representation of target-bound drugs by computed conformers: implications for conformational libraries
abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing number of known protein structures provides valuable information about pharmaceutical targets. Drug binding sites are identifiable and suitable lead compounds can be proposed. The flexibility of ligands is a critical point for the selection of potential drugs. Since computed 3D structures of millions of compounds are available, the knowledge of their binding conformations would be a great benefit for the development of efficient screening methods. RESULTS: Integration of two public databases allowed superposition of conformers for 193 approved drugs with 5507 crystallised target-bound counterparts. The generation of 9600 drug conformers using an atomic force field was carried out to obtain an optimal coverage of the conformational space. Bioactive conformations are best described by a conformational ensemble: half of all drugs exhibit multiple active states, distributed over the entire range of the reachable energy and conformational space.A number of up to 100 conformers per drug enabled us to reproduce the bound states within a similarity threshold of 1.0 angstroms in 70% of all cases. This fraction rises to about 90% for smaller or average sized drugs. CONCLUSION: Single drugs adopt multiple bioactive conformations if they interact with different target proteins. Due to the structural diversity of binding sites they adopt conformations that are distributed over a broad conformational space and wide energy range. Since the majority of drugs is well represented by a predefined low number of conformers (up to 100) this procedure is a valuable method to compare compounds by three-dimensional features or for fast similarity searches starting with pharmacophores. The underlying 9600 generated drug conformers are downloadable from the Super Drug Web site 1. All superpositions are visualised at the same source. Additional conformers (110,000) of 2400 classified WHO-drugs are also available.
Stefan Günther, Christian Senger, Elke Michalsky, Andrean Goede, Robert Preissner
BMC Bioinform.4
2005 SuperDrug: a conformational drug database
abstract
MOTIVATION: Different resources exist for experimentally determined and computed three-dimensional (3D)-structures of low molecular weight structures but for approved drugs, no free, publicly accessible source of 3D-structures and conformers is available. Furthermore, for selection purposes or for correlation of structural similarity with medical application, the assignment of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes to each structure according to the WHO-scheme would be desirable. RESULTS: The database contains approximately 2500 3D-structures of active ingredients of essential marketed drugs. To account for structural flexibility they are represented by 10(5) structural conformers. Here we present a web-query system enabling searches for drug name, synonyms, trade name, trivial name, formula, CAS-number, ATC-code etc. 2D-similarity screening (Tanimoto coefficients) and an automatic 3D-superposition procedure based on conformational representation are implemented. Drug structures above a similarity threshold as well as superimposed conformers can be retrieved in the mol- file format via a graphical interface. AVAILABILITY: For academic use the system is accessible at http://bioinf.charite.de/superdrug. The retrieval system requires the free browser-plugin 'chime' from MDL for visualization.
Andrean Goede, Mathias Dunkel, Nina Mester, Cornelius Frömmel, Robert Preissner
Bioinform.1
2005 SUPERFICIAL - Surface mapping of proteins via structure-based peptide library design
abstract
BACKGROUND: The determination of protein surfaces and the detection of binding sites are essential to our understanding of protein-protein interactions. Such binding sites can be characterised as linear and non-linear, the non-linear sites being prevailant. Conventional mapping techniques with arrays of synthetic peptides have limitations with regard to the location of discontinuous or non-linear binding sites of proteins. RESULTS: We present a structure-based approach to the design of peptide libraries that mimic the whole surface or a particular region of a protein. Neighbouring sequence segments are linked by short spacers to conserve local conformation. To this end, we have developed SUPERFICIAL, a program that uses protein structures as input and generates library proposals consisting of linear and non-linear peptides. This process can be influenced by a graphical user interface at different stages, from the surface computation up to the definition of spatial regions. CONCLUSION: Based on 3D structures, SUPERFICIAL may help to negotiate some of the existing limitations, since binding sites consisting of several linear pieces can now be detected.
Andrean Goede, Ines S. Jaeger, Robert Preissner
BMC Bioinform.1
2005 SuperLigands - a database of ligand structures derived from the Protein Data Bank
abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently, the PDB contains approximately 29,000 protein structures comprising over 70,000 experimentally determined three-dimensional structures of over 5,000 different low molecular weight compounds. Information about these PDB ligands can be very helpful in the field of molecular modelling and prediction, particularly for the prediction of protein binding sites and function. DESCRIPTION: Here we present an Internet accessible database delivering PDB ligands in the MDL Mol file format which, in contrast to the PDB format, includes information about bond types. Structural similarity of the compounds can be detected by calculation of Tanimoto coefficients and by three-dimensional superposition. Topological similarity of PDB ligands to known drugs can be assessed via Tanimoto coefficients. CONCLUSION: SuperLigands supplements the set of existing resources of information about small molecules bound to PDB structures. Allowing for three-dimensional comparison of the compounds as a novel feature, this database represents a valuable means of analysis and prediction in the field of biological and medical research.
Elke Michalsky, Mathias Dunkel, Andrean Goede, Robert Preissner
BMC Bioinform.3
2003 Accelerating screening of 3D protein data with a graph theoretical approach
abstract
MOTIVATION: The Dictionary of Interfaces in Proteins (DIP) is a database collecting the 3D structure of interacting parts of proteins that are called patches. It serves as a repository, in which patches similar to given query patches can be found. The computation of the similarity of two patches is time consuming and traversing the entire DIP requires some hours. In this work we address the question of how the patches similar to a given query can be identified by scanning only a small part of DIP. The answer to this question requires the investigation of the distribution of the similarity of patches. RESULTS: The score values describing the similarity of two patches can roughly be divided into three ranges that correspond to different levels of spatial similarity. Interestingly, the two iso-score lines separating the three classes can be determined by two different approaches. Applying a concept of the theory of random graphs reveals significant structural properties of the data in DIP. These can be used to accelerate scanning the DIP for patches similar to a given query. Searches for very similar patches could be accelerated by a factor of more than 25. Patches with a medium similarity could be found 10 times faster than by brute-force search.
Cornelius Frömmel, Christoph Gille, Andrean Goede, Clemens Gröpl, Stefan Hougardy, Till Nierhoff, Robert Preissner, Martin Thimm
Bioinform.3
2003 Inhomogeneous molecular density: reference packing densities and distribution of cavities within proteins
abstract
MOTIVATION: There is no consensus in the literature about how the deepest portions of protein structures are packed. Using an improved Voronoi procedure, we calculate reference packing densities for different regions in the protein interior. Furthermore, we want to clarify where cavities are located. RESULTS: Sets of reference packing densities are provided for regions in proteins that differ in their distance to the surface and to internal cavities, supplementing previous data. Packing in the protein interior is tight but generally inhomogeneous. There are about 4.4 cavities per 100 amino acids in protein structures, they occur in all regions, most frequently in a depth of 2.5-3.6 A underneath the Connolly surface. However, the deepest protein regions have a lower mean packing density than circumjacent regions, because more contacts to cavities occur in the core. AVAILABILITY/SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Calculation software and detailed packing data are available on request.
Kristian Rother, Robert Preissner, Andrean Goede, Cornelius Frömmel
Bioinform.3
1999 Homonyms and synonyms in the Dictionary of Interfaces in Proteins (DIP)
abstract
MOTIVATION: Should reports on molecular mimicry in particular cases, e.g. responsible for cross-reactivity, be considered as accidental or as a general principle in protein evolution? To answer this question, two types of similarity have to be considered: those in homologues (synonyms) and resemblance between patches from unrelated proteins (homonyms). RESULTS: All interfaces from known protein structures were collected in a comprehensive data bank [Dictionary of Interfaces in Proteins (DIP)]. A fast, sequence-independent, three-dimensional superposition procedure was developed to search automatically for geometrically similar surface areas. Surprisingly, we found a large number of structurally similar interfaces on the surface of unrelated proteins. Even patches from different types of secondary structure were found resembling each other. The putative functional meaning of homonyms is demonstrated with striking examples.
Robert Preissner, Andrean Goede, Cornelius Frömmel
Bioinform.2