Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John D. Calhoun

dblp:52/404 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault modeling
0.011992
A framework and method for hierarchical test generation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.011992
A framework and method for hierarchical test generation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › test generation › high-level test generation
hierarchical test generation
0.011992
A framework and method for hierarchical test generation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault modeling
stuck-at fault
0.011992
A framework and method for hierarchical test generation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.011992
A framework and method for hierarchical test generation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

module-oriented decision making · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 A framework and method for hierarchical test generation
abstract
The authors present an algorithm for hierarchical test generation based on module-oriented decision making (MODEM). The algorithm deals with combinational logic modules and the traditional single-stuck-at model. Modules and faults are captured at the function as well as the gate level. The benefits of hierarchy are realized by introducing a generic module representation and the concepts of a dynamic netlist and a dynamic calculus. The authors present the key elements of MODEM: the framework and fault targeting strategy, the module characterization, and a notation and calculus for module-oriented decision making. They conclude with a high-level view of MODEM implementation and experimental results on a variety of hierarchical benchmarks.>
John D. Calhoun, Franc Brglez
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
1989 A Framework and Method for Hierarchical Test Generation
abstract
The authors have proposed and implemented a dynamic framework and a method for hierarchically generating test patterns from a hierarchical net list. They have shown consistent gains in CPU over the traditional gate-level implementation while maintaining identical levels of fault coverage. In generating and characterizing modules for a large and varied set of hierarchical benchmarks, the authors benefited considerably from the consistent representations that are available during synthesis from a high-level description or when modules are generated by a process of technology mapping into standard cells. The authors introduced the concept of a single generic module which is hierarchical; the traditional AND, OR, NAND, and NOR are included implicitly. They developed a module-oriented decision-making algorithm, MODEM, which entails a dynamic calculus and procedures such as implication, error propagation, line justification, and probabilistic testability measures for a single generic module. Without loss of generality they adapted the control flow and basic features of PODEM in the first implementation of MODEM.>
John D. Calhoun, Franc Brglez
ITC1
1988 A modular scan-based testability system
abstract
The authors present a scan-based testability system that is an integral part of the cell-based design system at Microelectronics Center of North Carolina. The basic system consists of five modules: a scan-based audit to verify compliance with scan-based rules, a testability assessment module that projects fault coverage before any patterns are applied, a fast fault simulator that grades random and user-supplied patterns, an algorithmic test-pattern generator that produces test for faults that resist detection with random patterns or declares them redundant, and a test-pattern compactor to further reduce the size of the test-pattern set. The system serves as a platform for research into hierarchical methods, redundancy identification and removal, automated test point insertion, improved random test pattern generation, fault simulation, and boundary scan.>
Franc Brglez, David Bryan, John D. Calhoun, Robert Lisanke
ICCD3