Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benedict J. Leimkuhler

dblp:52/4339 · also Ben Leimkuhler · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8504-7091ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 52% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 19%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo › langevin dynamics
stochastic gradient langevin dynamics
0.722021
Better Training using Weight-Constrained Stochastic Dynamics · ICML 2021
Covariance-Controlled Adaptive Langevin Thermostat for Large-Scale Bayesian Sampling · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › efficient training
training acceleration
0.612022
Multirate Training of Neural Networks · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.512021
Better Training using Weight-Constrained Stochastic Dynamics · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics
0.212015
Covariance-Controlled Adaptive Langevin Thermostat for Large-Scale Bayesian Sampling · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.212015
Covariance-Controlled Adaptive Langevin Thermostat for Large-Scale Bayesian Sampling · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference
0.212015
Covariance-Controlled Adaptive Langevin Thermostat for Large-Scale Bayesian Sampling · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.212022
Multirate Training of Neural Networks · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 0.6multirate training · 0.6weight normalization · 0.5orthogonality preservation · 0.5langevin dynamics · 0.5stochastic gradient methods · 0.2covariance-controlled adaptive langevin thermostat · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Sampling from Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors with Symmetric Minibatch Splitting Langevin Dynamics
abstract
We propose a scalable kinetic Langevin dynamics algorithm for sampling parameter spaces of big data and AI applications. Our scheme combines a symmetric forward/backward sweep over minibatches with a symmetric discretization of Langevin dynamics. For a particular Langevin splitting method (UBU), we show that the resulting Symmetric Minibatch Splitting-UBU (SMS-UBU) integrator has bias $\mathcal{O}(h^2 d^{1/2})$ in dimension $d>0$ with stepsize $h>0$, despite only using one minibatch per iteration, thus providing excellent control of the sampling bias as a function of the stepsize. We apply the algorithm to explore local modes of the posterior distribution of Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) and evaluate the calibration performance of the posterior predictive probabilities for neural networks with convolutional neural network architectures for classification problems on three different datasets (Fashion-MNIST, Celeb-A and chest X-ray). Our results indicate that BNNs sampled with SMS-UBU can offer significantly better calibration performance compared to standard methods of training and stochastic weight averaging.
Daniel Paulin, Peter A. Whalley, Neil K. Chada, Benedict J. Leimkuhler
AISTATS4
2022 Multirate Training of Neural Networks
abstract
We propose multirate training of neural networks: partitioning neural network parameters into "fast" and "slow" parts which are trained on different time scales, where slow parts are updated less frequently. By choosing appropriate partitionings we can obtain substantial computational speed-up for transfer learning tasks. We show for applications in vision and NLP that we can fine-tune deep neural networks in almost half the time, without reducing the generalization performance of the resulting models. We analyze the convergence properties of our multirate scheme and draw a comparison with vanilla SGD. We also discuss splitting choices for the neural network parameters which could enhance generalization performance when neural networks are trained from scratch. A multirate approach can be used to learn different features present in the data and as a form of regularization. Our paper unlocks the potential of using multirate techniques for neural network training and provides several starting points for future work in this area.
Tiffany Vlaar, Benedict J. Leimkuhler
ICML2
2021 Better Training using Weight-Constrained Stochastic Dynamics
abstract
We employ constraints to control the parameter space of deep neural networks throughout training. The use of customised, appropriately designed constraints can reduce the vanishing/exploding gradients problem, improve smoothness of classification boundaries, control weight magnitudes and stabilize deep neural networks, and thus enhance the robustness of training algorithms and the generalization capabilities of neural networks. We provide a general approach to efficiently incorporate constraints into a stochastic gradient Langevin framework, allowing enhanced exploration of the loss landscape. We also present specific examples of constrained training methods motivated by orthogonality preservation for weight matrices and explicit weight normalizations. Discretization schemes are provided both for the overdamped formulation of Langevin dynamics and the underdamped form, in which momenta further improve sampling efficiency. These optimisation schemes can be used directly, without needing to adapt neural network architecture design choices or to modify the objective with regularization terms, and see performance improvements in classification tasks.
Benedict J. Leimkuhler, Tiffany Vlaar, Timothée Pouchon, Amos J. Storkey
ICML1
2015 Covariance-Controlled Adaptive Langevin Thermostat for Large-Scale Bayesian Sampling
abstract
Monte Carlo sampling for Bayesian posterior inference is a common approach used in machine learning. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo procedures that are used are often discrete-time analogues of associated stochastic differential equations (SDEs). These SDEs are guaranteed to leave invariant the required posterior distribution. An area of current research addresses the computational benefits of stochastic gradient methods in this setting. Existing techniques rely on estimating the variance or covariance of the subsampling error, and typically assume constant variance. In this article, we propose a covariance-controlled adaptive Langevin thermostat that can effectively dissipate parameter-dependent noise while maintaining a desired target distribution. The proposed method achieves a substantial speedup over popular alternative schemes for large-scale machine learning applications.
Xiaocheng Shang, Zhanxing Zhu, Benedict J. Leimkuhler, Amos J. Storkey
NIPS3
2003 A parallel multiple time-scale reversible integrator for dynamics simulation
Zhidong Jia, Benedict J. Leimkuhler
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.2