Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Neil G. Stoker

dblp:52/437 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
0000-0001-7055-6184ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.012003
Analysis of whole-genome microarray replicates using mixed models · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012003
Analysis of whole-genome microarray replicates using mixed models · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.012003
Analysis of whole-genome microarray replicates using mixed models · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing
microarray data normalization
0.012003
Analysis of whole-genome microarray replicates using mixed models · Bioinform. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mixed ANOVA models · 0.0hierarchical bootstrapping · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Analysis of whole-genome microarray replicates using mixed models
abstract
MOTIVATION: Microarray experiments are inherently noisy. Replication is the key to estimating realistic fold-changes despite such noise. In the analysis of the various sources of noise the dependency structure of the replication needs to be taken into account. RESULTS: We analyzed replicate data sets from a Mycobacterium tuberculosis trcS mutant in order to identify differentially expressed genes and suggest new methods for filtering and normalizing raw array data and for imputing missing values. Mixed ANOVA models are applied to quantify the various sources of error. Such analysis also allows us to determine the optimal number of samples and arrays. Significance values for differential expression are obtained by a hierarchical bootstrapping scheme on scaled residuals. Four highly upregulated genes, including bfrB, were analyzed further. We observed an artefact, where transcriptional readthrough from these genes led to apparent upregulation of adjacent genes. AVAILABILITY: All methods and data discussed are available in the package YASMAhttp://www.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/wernisch/yasma.html for the statistical data analysis system R (http://www.R-project.org).
Lorenz Wernisch, Sharon L. Kendall, Shamit Soneji, Andreas Wietzorrek, Tanya Parish, Jason Hinds, Philip D. Butcher, Neil G. Stoker
Bioinform.8