Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gerald M. Rubin

dblp:52/4538 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
0000-0001-8762-8703ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 77% Segmentation and scene understanding · 23%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
developmental biology
0.112007
Comparative Analysis of Spatial Patterns of Gene Expression in Drosophila melanogaster Imaginal Discs · RECOMB 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.112007
Comparative Analysis of Spatial Patterns of Gene Expression in Drosophila melanogaster Imaginal Discs · RECOMB 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression pattern analysis
spatial gene expression pattern analysis
0.112007
Comparative Analysis of Spatial Patterns of Gene Expression in Drosophila melanogaster Imaginal Discs · RECOMB 2007
Computer vision › 3D vision › shape matching
shape alignment
0.112005
Joint Nonparametric Alignment for Analyzing Spatial Gene Expression Patterns in Drosophila Imaginal Discs · CVPR (2) 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
gene annotation
0.012002
Biological and computational annotation of the Drosophila Genome Sequence · RECOMB 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genome annotation
0.012002
Biological and computational annotation of the Drosophila Genome Sequence · RECOMB 2002
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation
0.012005
Joint Nonparametric Alignment for Analyzing Spatial Gene Expression Patterns in Drosophila Imaginal Discs · CVPR (2) 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.012002
Biological and computational annotation of the Drosophila Genome Sequence · RECOMB 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
genomic sequence analysis
0.012002
Biological and computational annotation of the Drosophila Genome Sequence · RECOMB 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unsupervised nonparametric maximum likelihood · 0.1congealing · 0.1comparative analysis · 0.1experimental analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Comparative Analysis of Spatial Patterns of Gene Expression in Drosophila melanogaster Imaginal Discs
Cyrus L. Harmon, Parvez Ahammad, Ann Hammonds, Richard Weiszmann, Susan E. Celniker, S. Shankar Sastry, Gerald M. Rubin
RECOMB7
2006 Large-Scale Trends in the Evolution of Gene Structures within 11 Animal Genomes
abstract
We have used the annotations of six animal genomes (Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Ciona intestinalis, Drosophila melanogaster, Anopheles gambiae, and Caenorhabditis elegans) together with the sequences of five unannotated Drosophila genomes to survey changes in protein sequence and gene structure over a variety of timescales--from the less than 5 million years since the divergence of D. simulans and D. melanogaster to the more than 500 million years that have elapsed since the Cambrian explosion. To do so, we have developed a new open-source software library called CGL (for "Comparative Genomics Library"). Our results demonstrate that change in intron-exon structure is gradual, clock-like, and largely independent of coding-sequence evolution. This means that genome annotations can be used in new ways to inform, corroborate, and test conclusions drawn from comparative genomics analyses that are based upon protein and nucleotide sequence similarities.
Mark Yandell, Chris Mungall, Simon Prochnik, Joshua S. Kaminker, George Hartzell, Suzanna Lewis, Gerald M. Rubin
PLoS Comput. Biol.8
2005 Joint Nonparametric Alignment for Analyzing Spatial Gene Expression Patterns in Drosophila Imaginal Discs
abstract
To compare spatial patterns of gene expression, one must analyze a large number of images as current methods are only able to measure a small number of genes at a time. Bringing images of corresponding tissues into alignment is a critical first step in making a meaningful comparative analysis of these spatial patterns. Significant image noise and variability in the shapes make it hard to pick a canonical shape model. In this paper, we address these problems by combining segmentation and unsupervised shape learning algorithms. We first segment images to acquire structures of interest, then jointly align the shapes of these acquired structures using an unsupervised nonparametric maximum likelihood algorithm along the lines of 'congealing' (E. G. Miller et al., 2000), while simultaneously learning the underlying shape model and associated transformations. The learned transformations are applied to corresponding images to bring them into alignment in one step. We demonstrate the results for images of various classes of Drosophila imaginal discs and discuss the methodology used for a quantitative analysis of spatial gene expression patterns.
Parvez Ahammad, Cyrus L. Harmon, Ann Hammonds, S. Shankar Sastry, Gerald M. Rubin
CVPR (2)5
2002 Biological and computational annotation of the Drosophila Genome Sequence
abstract
The nucleotide sequence of the Drosophila melanogaster genome is now available and efforts are ongoing to improve its accuracy and annotation. The value of these sequence data will be enormously enhanced if we can provide for each gene information on: (1) the structure and expression pattern of its transcripts; (2) the mechanisms and logic used to control their expression; and (3) the functions of their protein products. My presentation will be directed toward the challenges of obtaining and interpreting such information for the fruit fly. Gene sequence and expression pattern databases will be extremely powerful tools. However, the function of a protein in a multicellular organism depends on context and will almost certainly need to be determined by experimental analysis. Collection of the required large datasets will be difficult and neither the intellectual framework nor experimental tools for analyzing complex gene networks are currently in place. Nevertheless, there is reason for cautious optimism that the complete genomic sequence of organisms will enable the necessary global approaches to study gene function and regulation. The conservation of gene structure and function during evolution will allow for the linking and sharing of information garnered in different experimental systems. But what data should be collected and how to interpret these data are much less clear. I will describe recent attempts by the Berkeley Drosophila Genome project to address some of these issues.
Gerald M. Rubin
RECOMB1
1969 Computer-produced Representation of dialectal variation: Initlal fricatives in Southern British English
W. Nelson Francis, Jan Svartvik, Gerald M. Rubin
COLING3