Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leonid B. Poutievski
dblp:52/518 · also Leon Poutievski
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 6 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
7 papers |
Routing and switching · 25% Datacenter networks · 20% Software-defined and programmable networks · 17% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing and switching
traffic engineering |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Jupiter evolving: transforming google's datacenter network via optical circuit switches and software-defined networking · SIGCOMM 2022 B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013 |
Datacenter networks
data center network topology |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Jupiter evolving: transforming google's datacenter network via optical circuit switches and software-defined networking · SIGCOMM 2022 |
Optical networks › optical switching
optical circuit switching |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Jupiter evolving: transforming google's datacenter network via optical circuit switches and software-defined networking · SIGCOMM 2022 |
Software-defined and programmable networks
SDN control plane |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane · NSDI 2021 |
Routing and switching › multipath routing
equal-cost multipath |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | WCMP: weighted cost multipathing for improved fairness in data centers · EuroSys 2014 |
Datacenter networks
load balancing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | WCMP: weighted cost multipathing for improved fairness in data centers · EuroSys 2014 |
Routing and switching
multipath routing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | WCMP: weighted cost multipathing for improved fairness in data centers · EuroSys 2014 |
Network management and operations › network automation
automated network management |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Jupiter evolving: transforming google's datacenter network via optical circuit switches and software-defined networking · SIGCOMM 2022 |
Internet architecture and protocols
packet processing |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Hashing Design in Modern Networks: Challenges and Mitigation Techniques · USENIX ATC 2022 |
Internet architecture and protocols › traffic management
bandwidth management |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013 |
Datacenter networks
datacenter interconnect |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013 |
Software-defined and programmable networks › SDN applications
software-defined WAN |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter network |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane · NSDI 2021 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter network
software-defined networking |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane · NSDI 2021 |
Software-defined and programmable networks
SDN controller |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Onix: A Distributed Control Platform for Large-scale Production Networks · OSDI 2010 |
Network management and operations
network configuration |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Onix: A Distributed Control Platform for Large-scale Production Networks · OSDI 2010 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › data dissemination
publish-subscribe |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Speccast · INFOCOM 2004 |
Routing and switching
routing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Speccast · INFOCOM 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
SDN · 0.6MEMS optical circuit switches · 0.6rate limiting · 0.3centralized traffic engineering · 0.3simulation · 0.0layered solution · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Jupiter evolving: transforming google's datacenter network via optical circuit switches and software-defined networkingabstractWe present a decade of evolution and production experience with Jupiter datacenter network fabrics. In this period Jupiter has delivered 5x higher speed and capacity, 30% reduction in capex, 41% reduction in power, incremental deployment and technology refresh all while serving live production traffic. A key enabler for these improvements is evolving Jupiter from a Clos to a direct-connect topology among the machine aggregation blocks. Critical architectural changes for this include: A datacenter interconnection layer employing Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) based Optical Circuit Switches (OCSes) to enable dynamic topology reconfiguration, centralized Software-Defined Networking (SDN) control for traffic engineering, and automated network operations for incremental capacity delivery and topology engineering. We show that the combination of traffic and topology engineering on direct-connect fabrics achieves similar throughput as Clos fabrics for our production traffic patterns. We also optimize for path lengths: 60% of the traffic takes direct path from source to destination aggregation blocks, while the remaining transits one additional block, achieving an average block-level path length of 1.4 in our fleet today. OCS also achieves 3x faster fabric reconfiguration compared to pre-evolution Clos fabrics that used a patch panel based interconnect. Leonid B. Poutievski, Omid Mashayekhi, Joon Ong, Muhammad Mukarram Bin Tariq, Rui Wang 0025, Virginia Beauregard, Patrick Conner, Steve D. Gribble, Rishi Kapoor, Stephen Kratzer, Nanfang Li, Karthik Nagaraj, Jason Ornstein, Samir Sawhney, Ryohei Urata, Lorenzo Vicisano, Kevin Yasumura, Shidong Zhang, Junlan Zhou, Amin Vahdat |
SIGCOMM | 1 |
| 2022 | Hashing Design in Modern Networks: Challenges and Mitigation Techniques
Yunhong Xu, Keqiang He, Rui Wang 0025, Minlan Yu, Nick G. Duffield, Hassan M. G. Wassel, Shidong Zhang, Leonid B. Poutievski, Junlan Zhou, Amin Vahdat |
USENIX ATC | 8 |
| 2021 | Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane
Andrew D. Ferguson, Steve D. Gribble, Chi-Yao Hong, Chip Killian, Waqar Mohsin, Henrik Mühe, Joon Ong, Leonid B. Poutievski, Lorenzo Vicisano, Richard Alimi, Shawn Shuoshuo Chen, Mike Conley, Subhasree Mandal, Karthik Nagaraj, Kondapa Naidu Bollineni, Amr Sabaa, Shidong Zhang, Amin Vahdat |
NSDI | 8 |
| 2014 | WCMP: weighted cost multipathing for improved fairness in data centersabstractData Center topologies employ multiple paths among servers to deliver scalable, cost-effective network capacity. The simplest and the most widely deployed approach for load balancing among these paths, Equal Cost Multipath (ECMP), hashes flows among the shortest paths toward a destination. ECMP leverages uniform hashing of balanced flow sizes to achieve fairness and good load balancing in data centers. However, we show that ECMP further assumes a balanced, regular, and fault-free topology, which are invalid assumptions in practice that can lead to substantial performance degradation and, worse, variation in flow bandwidths even for same size flows. Junlan Zhou, Malveeka Tewari, Abdul Kabbani, Leonid B. Poutievski, Amin Vahdat |
EuroSys | 5 |
| 2013 | B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wanabstractWe present the design, implementation, and evaluation of B4, a private WAN connecting Google's data centers across the planet. B4 has a number of unique characteristics: i) massive bandwidth requirements deployed to a modest number of sites, ii) elastic traffic demand that seeks to maximize average bandwidth, and iii) full control over the edge servers and network, which enables rate limiting and demand measurement at the edge. Sushant Jain, Subhasree Mandal, Joon Ong, Leonid B. Poutievski, Subbaiah Venkata, Jim Wanderer, Junlan Zhou, Jonathan Zolla, Urs Hölzle, Stephen Stuart, Amin Vahdat |
SIGCOMM | 5 |
| 2010 | Onix: A Distributed Control Platform for Large-scale Production Networks
Teemu Koponen, Martín Casado, Natasha Gude, Jeremy Stribling, Leonid B. Poutievski, Rajiv Ramanathan, Yuichiro Iwata, Hiroaki Inoue, Takayuki Hama, Scott Shenker |
OSDI | 5 |
| 2007 | Separating routing and forwarding: A clean-slate network layer designabstractWe present a ”clean-slate” design for a network-layer routing and forwarding system intended to address short-comings of the current Internet Protocol. Our design separates routing from both forwarding and topology discovery; requires only a flat, topology-independent namespace; and allows for policies of both users and service providers to be supported. Channels serve as the primary abstraction, allowing the network topology to be viewed at multiple levels of abstraction using the same identifiers. In this paper we present the basic design, which is based on loose source routing. Our routing and forwarding scheme is part of a larger project to produce a “clean-slate” network layer design. Kenneth L. Calvert, Jim Griffioen, Leonid B. Poutievski |
BROADNETS | 3 |
| 2006 | Toposemantic Network ClusteringabstractWe study the problem of building an optimal network-layer clustering hierarchy, where the optimality can be defined using three potentially conflicting metrics: state, delay and bandwidth. The problem of network clustering where a node's addresses depends on the node's location (e.g. in the hierarchy) is well studied. We study a problem where network nodes are addressed by specifications that might not be tied to locations in the topology. We propose and compare several distributed clustering algorithms: (i) clustering based solely on topology, (ii) clustering based solely on semantics (node specifications) and (iii) a combination of the above methods (toposemantic network clustering), where we specify a parameter that determines how much the clustering depends on topology and how much on semantics. We show that the toposemantic method yields the best results when we know the right parameter value for a given topology and assignment of specifications. We propose an algorithm that does not require a parameter, but nevertheless yields better results than the first two methods. Leonid B. Poutievski, Kenneth L. Calvert, Jim Griffioen |
GLOBECOM | 1 |
| 2004 | SpeccastabstractWe describe a new network service called speccast. Speccast offers a generalized addressing and routing abstraction on which a rich variety of semantic services can be built, and, as such, provides a vehicle for studying the relationships among routing, addressing and topology. Unlike overlay-based systems, we study a more basic problem, in which the topology of the network is given, and there is not necessarily any pre-existing underlying network service. In the speccast model, each packet carries a destination predicate and the network's job is to deliver the packet to all nodes satisfying that predicate. After showing how this generalized routing service subsumes other services both traditional (unicast, multicast) and emerging (publish-subscribe), we present a layered solution for a specific class of simple predicates. We examine the tradeoffs in various forms of our approach, and compare it to existing solutions for unicast and multicast. Studies using transit-stub graphs show that our generic service performs comparably to existing solutions for traditional services, while also effectively supporting new and emerging services. Leonid B. Poutievski, Kenneth L. Calvert, Jim Griffioen |
INFOCOM | 1 |
| 2003 | Leveraging emerging network services to scale multimedia applicationsabstractAbstract Multicast services have been used to transmit multimedia data to large receiver groups. Only recently have counterpart network services been introduced to provide similar scalability and anonymity in the opposite direction (i.e. messages from a group of senders destined for a common receiver). In this paper, we explore how these many‐to‐one services, specifically the concast service, can be used to improve the scalability and performance of multimedia applications. In particular, we show how such services can be used in both the control and data planes to overcome well‐known scalability problems (e.g. with Real Time Protocol) that are difficult to solve effectively with end‐system approaches alone. We validate our solutions by presenting experimental results taken from prototype video and audio applications we designed and implemented. Our initial results show substantial reductions in congestion‐induced loss using these generic services. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Kenneth L. Calvert, Jim Griffioen, Billy Mullins, Swaminathan Natarajan, Leonid B. Poutievski, Amit Sehgal, Su Wen |
Softw. Pract. Exp. | 5 |
| 2001 | Leveraging emerging network services to scale multimedia applicationsabstractMulticast services have been used for many years to transmit multimedia data to large receiver groups. However, only recently have counterpart network services been introduced that provide similar scalability and anonymity in the opposite direction (i.e., messages from a group of senders destined for a common receiver). In this paper, we explore how these emerging services, specifically a concast service (many-to-one communication service), can be used to improve the scalability and performance of multimedia applications. In particular, we show how such services can be used in both the control and data planes to overcome well-known scalability problems (e.g., with RTP) that are difficult to solve effectively with end-system approaches alone. We validate our solutions by presenting experimental results taken from prototype video and audio applications we designed and implemented. Our initial results show a reduction of as much as two orders of magnitude in packet loss rates using these generic services. Kenneth L. Calvert, Jim Griffioen, Billy Mullins, Swaminathan Natarajan, Leonid B. Poutievski, Amit Sehgal, Su Wen |
ICCCN | 5 |