Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yen-Shen Chen

dblp:52/5356 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis › data path synthesis
data path allocation
0.011990
Data Path Allocation Based on Bipartite Weighted Matching · DAC 1990
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis
0.011990
Data Path Allocation Based on Bipartite Weighted Matching · DAC 1990
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis › resource binding
register allocation
0.011990
Data Path Allocation Based on Bipartite Weighted Matching · DAC 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hungarian method · 0.0greedy method · 0.0bipartite weighted matching · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Data Path Allocation Based on Bipartite Weighted Matching
abstract
We propose a graph-theoretic approach for the data path allocation problem. We decompose the problem into three subproblems: (1) register allocation, (2) operation assignment, and (3) connection allocation. The first two subproblems are modeled as two bipartite weighted matching problems and solved using the Hungarian Method [Pap82]. The third subproblem is solved using a greedy method. While previous researches suffer controversy over which one of subproblems (1) and (2) should be done first, we show that, by taking the other into consideration while performing one, equally satisfactory results can be obtained. We have implemented two programs, LYRA and ARYL, to solve the subproblems in different orders, namely, “(1), (2), then (3)” and “(2), (1), then (3)”, respectively. The matching paradigm allows us to take a more global approach toward the problem than previous researches do. For register allocation, our approach is the first one to guarantee minimal usage of registers while being able to take the interconnection cost into account. For all the benchmarks from the literature, both LYRA and ARYL produced designs as good as, if not better than, those by others in very short time. This research has demonstrated that the bipartite weighted matching algorithm is indeed a very good solution for the data path allocation problem.
Chu-Yi Huang, Yen-Shen Chen, Youn-Long Lin, Yu-Chin Hsu
DAC2