Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jung Jin Lee

dblp:52/6252 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
0000-0001-6257-3072ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 56% Data mining · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › probabilistic model
maximum entropy model
0.011986
The Maximum Entropy Principle in Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1986
Information retrieval › retrieval models
probabilistic retrieval model
0.011986
The Maximum Entropy Principle in Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1986
Information retrieval › ranking
relevance estimation
0.011986
The Maximum Entropy Principle in Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear equation solving · 0.0maximum entropy · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Testing the Maximum Entropy Principle for Information Retrieval
abstract
A probabilistic information retrieval method using the Maximum Entropy Principle (MEP) was proposed by Cooper and Huizinga (1982). Several refinements of the MEP for information retrieval have been proposed by Kantor and Lee (1986, 1991), but the MEP has not been evaluated in any large database. This article examines the MEP retrieval method using the TREC5 database. The MEP is evaluated by several tests and compared with a “naive ordering method” and “lexicographic ordering method.” The MEP does not provide any startling improvement, and it works reasonably well only in the case of a small number of keys and a relatively small collection. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Paul B. Kantor, Jung Jin Lee
J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.2
1991 A study of probabilistic information retrieval systems in the case of inconsistent expert judgments
abstract
The maximum entropy principle may be applied to the design of probabilistic retrieval systems. When there are inconsistent expert judgments, the resulting optimization problem cannot be solved. The inconsistency of the expert judgments can be revealed by solving a linear programming formulation. In the case of inconsistent judgment, four plausible schemes are proposed in order to find revised judgments which are consistent with the true data structure but still reflect the original expert judgment. These schemes are the Interactive, Minimum Distance, Minimum Cross-Entropy, and Path methods. © 1991 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Jung Jin Lee, Paul B. Kantor
J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.1
1986 The Maximum Entropy Principle in Information Retrieval
abstract
Applications, assumptions and properties of the maximum entropy principle are discussed. The maximum entropy principle integrates prior estimates of relevance with the observed distribution of term combinations. The result may be a reordering of the segments of a database, compared to a naive estimate. Numerical examples obtained by solution of the non-linear equations for the dual variables are presented and discussed.
Paul B. Kantor, Jung Jin Lee
SIGIR2