Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhihong Lu 0001

dblp:52/6947-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
0000-0003-2114-4452ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Information retrieval · 89% Query processing and optimization · 11%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
distributed information retrieval
0.142000
Evaluating the performance of distributed architectures for information retrieval using a variety of workloads · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2000
Partial collection replication versus caching for information retrieval systems · SIGIR 2000
Partial Replica Selection Based on Relevance for Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1999
Information retrieval › distributed information retrieval
resource selection
0.021999
Partial Replica Selection Based on Relevance for Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1999
Searching Distributed Collections with Inference Networks · SIGIR 1995
Information retrieval › retrieval models › probabilistic retrieval model
inference network model
0.021999
Partial Replica Selection Based on Relevance for Information Retrieval · SIGIR 1999
Searching Distributed Collections with Inference Networks · SIGIR 1995
Query processing and optimization
query result caching
0.012000
Partial collection replication versus caching for information retrieval systems · SIGIR 2000
Information retrieval › query understanding › query analysis
query similarity
0.012000
Partial collection replication versus caching for information retrieval systems · SIGIR 2000
Information retrieval
search engines
0.012000
Evaluating the performance of distributed architectures for information retrieval using a variety of workloads · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2000
Information retrieval › distributed information retrieval
result merging
0.011995
Searching Distributed Collections with Inference Networks · SIGIR 1995
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.011995
Searching Distributed Collections with Inference Networks · SIGIR 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workload characterization · 0.1multithreaded simulation · 0.1simulation · 0.1inference network · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Partial Collection Replication for Information Retrieval
Zhihong Lu 0001, Kathryn S. McKinley
Inf. Retr.1
2000 Partial collection replication versus caching for information retrieval systems
abstract
Abstract The explosion of content in distributed infer-marion retrieval (IR) systems requires new mechanisms to attain timely and accurate retrieval of unstructured text. In this paper, we compare two mechanisms to improve IR sys-tem performance: partial collection replication and caching. When queries have locality, both mechanisms return results more quickly than sending queries to the original collec-tion(s). Caches return results when queries exactly match a previous one. Partial replicas are a form of caching that return results when the IR technology determines the query is a good match. Caches are simpler and faster, but repli-cas can increase locality by detecting similarity between queries that are not exactly the same. We use real traces from THOMAS and Excite to measure query locality and similarity. With a very restrictive definition of query sim-ilarity, similarity improves query locality up to 15 % over exact match. We use a validated simulator to compare their performance, and find that even if the partial replica hit rate increases only 3 to 6%, it will outperform simple caching under a variety of configurations. A combined approach will probably yield the best performance.
Zhihong Lu 0001, Kathryn S. McKinley
SIGIR1
2000 Evaluating the performance of distributed architectures for information retrieval using a variety of workloads
abstract
The information explosion across the Internet and elswhere offers access to an increasing number of document collections. In order for users to effectively access these collections, information retrieval (IR) systems must provide coordinated, concurrent, and distributed access. In this article, we explore how to achieve scalable performance in a distributed system for collection sizes ranging from 1GB to 128GB. We implement a fully functional distributed IR system based on a multithreaded version of the Inquery simulation model. We measure performance as a function of system parameters such as client command rate, number of document collections, ter ms per query, query term frequency, number of answers returned, and command mixture. Our results show that it is important to model both query and document commands because the heterogeneity of commands significantly impacts performance. Based on our results, we recommend simple changes to the prototype and evaluate the changes using the simulator. Because of the significant resource demands of information retrieval, it is not difficult to generate workloads that overwhelm system resources regardless of the architecture. However under some realistic workloads, we demonstrate system organizations for which response time gracefully degrades as the workload increases and performance scales with the number of processors. This scalable architecture includes a surprisingly small number of brokers through which a large number of clients and servers communicate.
Brendon Cahoon, Kathryn S. McKinley, Zhihong Lu 0001
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.3
1999 Partial Replica Selection Based on Relevance for Information Retrieval
abstract
Partial collection replication improves performance and scalability of a large-scale distributed information retrieval system by distributing excessive w orkloads, reducing network latency, and restricting some searches to a small percentage of data.In this paper, we rst examine queries from real system logs and show that there is sucient query locality in real systems to justify partial collection replication.We then present a method for constructing a hierarchy of partial replicas from a collection where each replica is a subset of all larger replicas, and extend the inference network model to rank and select partial replicas.We compare our new selection algorithm to previous work on collection selection over a range of tuning parameters.For a given query, our replica selection algorithm correctly determines the most relevant of the replicas or original collection, and thus maintains the highest retrieval eectiveness while searching the least data as compared with the other ranking functions.Simulation results show that with load balancing, partial replication consistently improves performance over collection partitioning on multiple disks of a shared-memory multiprocessor and it requires only modest query locality.
Zhihong Lu 0001, Kathryn S. McKinley
SIGIR1
1998 The Hardware/Software Balancing Act for Information Retrieval on Symmetric Multiprocessors
Zhihong Lu 0001, Kathryn S. McKinley, Brendon Cahoon
Euro-Par1
1995 Searching Distributed Collections with Inference Networks
abstract
The use of information retrieval systems in networked environments raises a new set of issues that have received little attention.These issues include ranking document collections for relevance to a query, selecting the best set of collections from a ranked list, and merging the document rankings that are returned from a set of collections.This paper describes methods of addressing each issue in the inference network model, dkcusses their implementation in the INQUERY system, and presents experimental results demonstrating their effectiveness.1
Jamie Callan, Zhihong Lu 0001, W. Bruce Croft
SIGIR2