Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Li Li 0111
dblp:53/2189-111
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6892-3683ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 50% Storage systems · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems
data placement |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive Data Placement in Multi-Cloud Storage: A Non-Stationary Combinatorial Bandit Approach · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2023 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud storage
multi-cloud storage |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive Data Placement in Multi-Cloud Storage: A Non-Stationary Combinatorial Bandit Approach · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
upper confidence bound · 0.7page-hinkley test · 0.7combinatorial multi-armed bandit · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Adaptive Data Placement in Multi-Cloud Storage: A Non-Stationary Combinatorial Bandit ApproachabstractMulti-cloud storage is recently a viable approach to solve the vendor lock-in, reliability, and security issues in cloud storage systems. As a key concern, data placement influences the cost and performance of storage services. Yet, in practice it remains challenging to address the huge solution space. Previous studies typically focus on constructing efficient data placement schemes based on the predicted pattern of workloads or assuming fully a-priori known network conditions. They cannot be easily applied in multi-cloud storage scenarios, which typically involve dynamic network conditions and time-varying workloads. To this end, we formulate the data placement optimization in a combinatorial multi-arm bandit (CMAB) perspective and solve it by learning placement strategy online. In contrast to a stationary setting where reward distributions are unknown but identical over time, we consider a realistic multi-cloud environment with non-stationary conditions, i.e., reward distributions change over time. To swiftly accommodate this, we propose an adaptive window combinatorial upper confidence bound based data placement (AW-CUCB-DP) scheme to reduce latency and cost. In AW-CUCB-DP, a simple and efficient change detector, i.e.,Page-Hinkley testwith forgetting mechanism (FM-PHT), is employed to enable variable-size sliding windows to handle both gradual and abrupt variations in network conditions or workloads. We establish that AW-CUCB-DP is asymptotically optimal in the non-stationary multi-cloud environment. Trace-driven experiments further verify that our scheme outperforms alternatives, especially in highly dynamic environments. Li Li 0111, Jiajie Shen, Bochun Wu, Yangfan Zhou 0002, Xin Wang 0134, Keqin Li 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 1 |