Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Changning Huang
dblp:53/4081
· DBLP profile ↗
25ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 24 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 81% Language models and text generation · 15% Machine translation · 4% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 78% Recommender systems · 22% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › word segmentation
chinese word segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Improved Source-Channel Models for Chinese Word Segmentation · ACL 2003 |
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Improving Query Translation for Cross-Language Information Retrieval Using Statistical Models · SIGIR 2001 |
Information retrieval › cross-language information retrieval
query translation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Improving Query Translation for Cross-Language Information Retrieval Using Statistical Models · SIGIR 2001 |
Information retrieval › cross-language information retrieval
translation ambiguity resolution |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Improving Query Translation for Cross-Language Information Retrieval Using Statistical Models · SIGIR 2001 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
base noun phrase chunking |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | A Unified Statistical Model for the Identification of English BaseNP · ACL 2000 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Dependency-based Syntactic Analysis of Chinese and Annotation of Parsed Corpus · ACL 2000 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | A Unified Statistical Model for the Identification of English BaseNP · ACL 2000 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text correction
spelling correction |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | PENS: A Machine-aided English Writing System for Chinese Users · ACL 2000 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Dependency-based Syntactic Analysis of Chinese and Annotation of Parsed Corpus · ACL 2000 |
Recommender systems
recommendation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | PENS: A Machine-aided English Writing System for Chinese Users · ACL 2000 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Word Sense Disambiguation Based on Structured Semantic Space · EMNLP 1997 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Improved Source-Channel Models for Chinese Word Segmentation · ACL 2003 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chinese language processing |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Dependency-based Syntactic Analysis of Chinese and Annotation of Parsed Corpus · ACL 2000 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
computer-assisted translation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | PENS: A Machine-aided English Writing System for Chinese Users · ACL 2000 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
statistical parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | A Unified Statistical Model for the Identification of English BaseNP · ACL 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical spelling correction · 0.1information retrieval · 0.1source-channel model · 0.0statistical machine translation · 0.0co-occurrence model · 0.0viterbi algorithm · 0.0statistical model · 0.0insertion · 0.0deletion · 0.0character substitution · 0.0approximate word-matching · 0.0N-best POS tagging · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Two-level Word Class Categorization Model in Analytic Languages and Its Implications for POS Tagging in Modern Chinese Corpora
Renqiang Wang, Changning Huang |
PACLIC | 2 |
| 2010 | Semantic Role Labeling for News Tweets
Kuan Li, Ming Zhou 0001, Long Jiang, Zhongyang Xiong, Changning Huang |
COLING | 7 |
| 2010 | A Unified Character-Based Tagging Framework for Chinese Word SegmentationabstractChinese word segmentation is an active area in Chinese language processing though it is suffering from the argument about what precisely is a word in Chinese. Based on corpus-based segmentation standard, we launched this study. In detail, we regard Chinese word segmentation as a character-based tagging problem. We show that there has been a potent trend of using a character-based tagging approach in this field. In particular, learning from segmented corpus with or without additional linguistic resources is treated in a unified way in which the only difference depends on how the feature template set is selected. It differs from existing work in that both feature template selection and tag set selection are considered in our approach, instead of the previous feature template focus only technique. We show that there is a significant performance difference as different tag sets are selected. This is especially applied to a six-tag set, which is good enough for most current segmented corpora. The linguistic meaning of a tag set is also discussed. Our results show that a simple learning system with six n -gram feature templates and a six-tag set can obtain competitive performance in the cases of learning only from a training corpus. In cases when additional linguistic resources are available, an ensemble learning technique, assistant segmenter, is proposed and its effectiveness is verified. Assistant segmenter is also proven to be an effective method as segmentation standard adaptation that outperforms existing ones. Based on the proposed approach, our system provides state-of-the-art performance in all 12 corpora of three international Chinese word segmentation bakeoffs. Hai Zhao 0001, Changning Huang, Mu Li 0001, Bao-Liang Lu |
ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process. | 2 |
| 2009 | Extracting Keyphrases from Chinese News Articles Using TextRank and Query Log Knowledge
Weiming Liang, Changning Huang, Mu Li 0001, Bao-Liang Lu |
PACLIC | 2 |
| 2008 | Which Performs Better on In-Vocabulary Word Segmentation: Based on Word or Character?
Changning Huang |
IJCNLP | 2 |
| 2008 | The Character-based CRF Segmenter of MSRA&NEU for the 4th Bakeoff
Changning Huang |
IJCNLP | 2 |
| 2006 | Which Is Essential for Chinese Word Segmentation: Character versus Word
Changning Huang |
PACLIC | 1 |
| 2006 | Effective Tag Set Selection in Chinese Word Segmentation via Conditional Random Field Modeling
Hai Zhao 0001, Changning Huang, Mu Li 0001, Bao-Liang Lu |
PACLIC | 2 |
| 2005 | Chinese Word Segmentation and Named Entity Recognition: A Pragmatic ApproachabstractThis article presents a pragmatic approach to Chinese word segmentation. It differs from most previous approaches mainly in three respects. First, while theoretical linguists have defined Chinese words using various linguistic criteria, Chinese words in this study are defined pragmatically as segmentation units whose definition depends on how they are used and processed in realistic computer applications. Second, we propose a pragmatic mathematical framework in which segmenting known words and detecting unknown words of different types (i.e., morphologically derived words, factoids, named entities, and other unlisted words) can be performed simultaneously in a unified way. These tasks are usually conducted separately in other systems. Finally, we do not assume the existence of a universal word segmentation standard that is application-independent. Instead, we argue for the necessity of multiple segmentation standards due to the pragmatic fact that different natural language processing applications might require different granularities of Chinese words. These pragmatic approaches have been implemented in an adaptive Chinese word segmenter, called MSRSeg, which will be described in detail. It consists of two components: (1) a generic segmenter that is based on the framework of linear mixture models and provides a unified approach to the five fundamental features of word-level Chinese language processing: lexicon word processing, morphological analysis, factoid detection, named entity recognition, and new word identification; and (2) a set of output adaptors for adapting the output of (1) to different application-specific standards. Evaluation on five test sets with different standards shows that the adaptive system achieves state-of-the-art performance on all the test sets. Jianfeng Gao 0001, Mu Li 0001, Changning Huang, Andi Wu |
Comput. Linguistics | 3 |
| 2004 | The Use of SVM for Chinese New Word Identification
Hongqiao Li, Changning Huang, Jianfeng Gao 0001, Xiaozhong Fan |
IJCNLP | 2 |
| 2003 | Improved Source-Channel Models for Chinese Word SegmentationabstractThis paper presents a Chinese word segmentation system that uses improved source-channel models of Chinese sentence generation. Chinese words are defined as one of the following four types: lexicon words, morphologically derived words, factoids, and named entities. Our system provides a unified approach to the four fundamental features of word-level Chinese language processing: (1) word segmentation, (2) morphological analysis, (3) factoid detection, and (4) named entity recognition. The performance of the system is evaluated on a manually annotated test set, and is also compared with several state-of-the-art systems, taking into account the fact that the definition of Chinese words often varies from system to system. Jianfeng Gao 0001, Mu Li 0001, Changning Huang |
ACL | 3 |
| 2002 | Chinese Named Entity Identification Using Class-based Language Model
Jian Sun 0001, Jianfeng Gao 0001, Lei Zhang 0001, Ming Zhou 0001, Changning Huang |
COLING | 5 |
| 2002 | Structure Alignment Using Bilingual Chunking
Jin-Xia Huang, Changning Huang |
COLING | 4 |
| 2001 | Improving Query Translation for Cross-Language Information Retrieval Using Statistical ModelsabstractDictionaries have often been used for query translation in cross-language information retrieval (CLIR). However, we are faced with the problem of translation ambiguity, i.e. multiple translations are stored in a dictionary for a word. In addition, a word-by-word query translation is not precise enough. In this paper, we explore several methods to improve the previous dictionary-based query translation. First, as many as possible, noun phrases are recognized and translated as a whole by using statistical models and phrase translation patterns. Second, the best word translations are selected based on the cohesion of the translation words. Our experimental results on TREC English-Chinese CLIR collection show that these techniques result in significant improvements over the simple dictionary approaches, and achieve even better performance than a high-quality machine translation system. Jianfeng Gao 0001, Endong Xun, Ming Zhou 0001, Changning Huang, Jian-Yun Nie |
SIGIR | 4 |
| 2000 | Dependency-based Syntactic Analysis of Chinese and Annotation of Parsed CorpusabstractFollowing a dependency-based framework that admits no intermediate phrasal nodes and allows no crossing of syntactic dependency links, we discuss how Chinese sentences are analysed and annotated using an SGML-based scheme. Issues related to tolerance of errors at various levels of analysis and compatibility with other syntactic frameworks are addressed. Tom B. Y. Lai, Changning Huang |
ACL | 2 |
| 2000 | PENS: A Machine-aided English Writing System for Chinese UsersabstractWriting English is a big barrier for most Chinese users. To build a computer-aided system that helps Chinese users not only on spelling checking and grammar checking but also on writing in the way of native-English is a challenging task. Although machine translation is widely used for this purpose, how to find an efficient way in which human collaborates with computers remains an open issue. In this paper, based on the comprehensive study of Chinese users requirements, we propose an approach to machine aided English writing system, which consists of two components: 1) a statistical approach to word spelling help, and 2) an information retrieval based approach to intelligent recommendation by providing suggestive example sentences. Both components work together in a unified way, and highly improve the productivity of English writing. We also developed a pilot system, namely PENS (Perfect ENglish System). Preliminary experiments show very promising results. Ting Liu 0001, Ming Zhou 0001, Jianfeng Gao 0001, Endong Xun, Changning Huang |
ACL | 5 |
| 2000 | A Unified Statistical Model for the Identification of English BaseNPabstractThis paper presents a novel statistical model for automatic identification of English baseNP. It uses two steps: the N-best Part-Of-Speech (POS) tagging and baseNP identification given the N-best POS-sequences. Unlike the other approaches where the two steps are separated, we integrate them into a unified statistical framework. Our model also integrates lexical information. Finally, Viterbi algorithm is applied to make global search in the entire sentence, allowing us to obtain linear complexity for the entire process. Compared with other methods using the same testing set, our approach achieves 92.3% in precision and 93.2% in recall. The result is comparable with or better than the previously reported results. Endong Xun, Changning Huang, Ming Zhou 0001 |
ACL | 2 |
| 2000 | Automatic Detecting/Correcting Errors in Chinese Text by an Approximate Word-Matching AlgorithmabstractAn approximate word-matching algorithm for Chinese is presented. Based on this algorithm, an effective approach to Chinese spelling error detection and correction is implemented. With a word tri-gram language model, the optimal string is searched from all possible derivation of the input sentence using operations of character substitution, insertion, and deletion. Comparing the original sentence with the optimal string, spelling error detection and correction is realized simultaneously. Changning Huang, Haihua Pan |
ACL | 3 |
| 2000 | Hua Yu: A Word-segmented and Part-Of-Speech Tagged Chinese Corpus
Maosong Sun 0001, Honglin Sun, Changning Huang, Zhang Pu, Xing Hongbing, Zhou Qiang |
LREC | 3 |
| 1999 | Free Word Order in a Constraint-based Implementation of Dependency Grammar
Tom B. Y. Lai, Changning Huang |
PACLIC | 2 |
| 1997 | Learning New Compositions from Given Ones
Donghong Ji, Changning Huang |
CoNLL | 3 |
| 1997 | Word Sense Disambiguation Based on Structured Semantic Space
Donghong Ji, Changning Huang |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 1994 | The Evolution Of Machine-Tractable Dictionaries
Cheng-ming Guo, Changning Huang, Junping Gong |
COLING | 2 |
| 1994 | An Efficient Syntactic Tagging Tool For Corpora
Changning Huang |
COLING | 2 |
| 1992 | Knowledge Acquisition And Chinese Parsing Based On Corpus
Chunfa Yuan, Changning Huang, Shimei Pan |
COLING | 2 |