Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Meng Tang 0001
dblp:53/4380-1
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
7as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-2984-1343ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 7 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 10 · 6 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
11 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 34% Generative modeling · 26% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Visual content generation and editing · 78% Geometric modeling and processing · 22% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% |
Topics — the 27 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
weakly supervised semantic segmentation |
1.0 | 3 | 2019 | Beyond Gradient Descent for Regularized Segmentation Losses · CVPR 2019 On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentation · ECCV (16) 2018 Normalized Cut Loss for Weakly-Supervised CNN Segmentation · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
1.0 | 4 | 2018 | On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentation · ECCV (16) 2018 Normalized Cut Meets MRF · ECCV (2) 2016 Secrets of GrabCut and Kernel K-Means · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Self-Cross Diffusion Guidance for Text-to-Image Synthesis of Similar Subjects · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
selective attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Self-Cross Diffusion Guidance for Text-to-Image Synthesis of Similar Subjects · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Self-Cross Diffusion Guidance for Text-to-Image Synthesis of Similar Subjects · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Latent Space Editing in Transformer-Based Flow Matching · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › latent space
latent space manipulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Latent Space Editing in Transformer-Based Flow Matching · AAAI 2024 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | Kernel Clustering: Density Biases and Solutions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 Kernel Cuts: Kernel and Spectral Clustering Meet Regularization · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019 |
Visual content generation and editing
image editing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Latent Space Editing in Transformer-Based Flow Matching · AAAI 2024 |
Visual content generation and editing › image editing
text-guided image editing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Latent Space Editing in Transformer-Based Flow Matching · AAAI 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Beyond Gradient Descent for Regularized Segmentation Losses · CVPR 2019 Normalized Cut Loss for Weakly-Supervised CNN Segmentation · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentation · ECCV (16) 2018 Normalized Cut Loss for Weakly-Supervised CNN Segmentation · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › pose estimation
shape and pose estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | FroDO: From Detections to 3D Objects · CVPR 2020 |
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | FroDO: From Detections to 3D Objects · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
interactive segmentation |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Secrets of GrabCut and Kernel K-Means · ICCV 2015 GrabCut in One Cut · ICCV 2013 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Beyond Gradient Descent for Regularized Segmentation Losses · CVPR 2019 |
Data mining › clustering
kernel clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Kernel Clustering: Density Biases and Solutions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Kernel Cuts: Kernel and Spectral Clustering Meet Regularization · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph cut |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Kernel Cuts: Kernel and Spectral Clustering Meet Regularization · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Normalized Cut Meets MRF · ECCV (2) 2016 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › graph-based segmentation
normalized cuts |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Normalized Cut Meets MRF · ECCV (2) 2016 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Pseudo-bound Optimization for Binary Energies · ECCV (5) 2014 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Pseudo-bound Optimization for Binary Energies · ECCV (5) 2014 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
energy minimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Pseudo-bound Optimization for Binary Energies · ECCV (5) 2014 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking › appearance modeling
appearance model learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | GrabCut in One Cut · ICCV 2013 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › energy minimization
graph cuts |
0.1 | 2 | 2015 | Secrets of GrabCut and Kernel K-Means · ICCV 2015 GrabCut in One Cut · ICCV 2013 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
clustering theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Kernel Clustering: Density Biases and Solutions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer-based u-vit · 1.5flow matching · 1.5adaptive step-size ODE solver · 1.5kernel methods · 1.1self-attention · 0.9cross-attention · 0.9multi-view optimization · 0.9encoder network · 0.9deep signed distance function · 0.9regularization · 0.8graph cuts · 0.6locally adaptive kernels · 0.4alternating direction method of multipliers · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Diversifying Similar Subjects for Text-to-Image Synthesis with Self-Cross Diffusion Guidance and Reward
Weimin Qiu, Jieke Wang, Zhining Gu, Vincent Tao Hu, Meng Tang 0001 |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 5 |
| 2025 | Self-Cross Diffusion Guidance for Text-to-Image Synthesis of Similar SubjectsabstractDiffusion models achieved unprecedented fidelity and diversity for synthesizing image, video, 3D assets, etc. However, subject mixing is an unresolved issue for diffusion-based image synthesis, particularly for synthesizing multiple similar-looking subjects. We propose Self-Cross Diffusion Guidance to penalize the overlap between cross-attention maps and the aggregated self-attention map. Compared to previous methods based on self-attention or cross-attention alone, our guidance is more effective in eliminating subject mixing. What’s more, our guidance addresses subject mixing for all relevant patches beyond the most discriminant one, e.g., the beak of a bird. For each subject, we aggregate self-attention maps of patches with higher cross-attention values. Thus, the aggregated self-attention map forms a region that the whole subject attends to. Our training-free method boosts the performance of both Unet-based and Transformer-based diffusion models such as the Stable Diffusion series. We also release a similar subjects dataset (SSD), a challenging benchmark, and utilize GPT-4o for automatic and reliable evaluation. Extensive qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate the effectiveness of our self-cross diffusion guidance. Weimin Qiu, Jieke Wang, Meng Tang 0001 |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2024 | Latent Space Editing in Transformer-Based Flow MatchingabstractThis paper strives for image editing via generative models. Flow Matching is an emerging generative modeling technique that offers the advantage of simple and efficient training. Simultaneously, a new transformer-based U-ViT has recently been proposed to replace the commonly used UNet for better scalability and performance in generative modeling. Hence, Flow Matching with a transformer backbone offers the potential for scalable and high-quality generative modeling, but their latent structure and editing ability are as of yet unknown. Hence, we adopt this setting and explore how to edit images through latent space manipulation. We introduce an editing space, which we call u-space, that can be manipulated in a controllable, accumulative, and composable manner. Additionally, we propose a tailored sampling solution to enable sampling with the more efficient adaptive step-size ODE solvers. Lastly, we put forth a straightforward yet powerful method for achieving fine-grained and nuanced editing using text prompts. Our framework is simple and efficient, all while being highly effective at editing images while preserving the essence of the original content. Our code will be publicly available at https://taohu.me/lfm/ Vincent Tao Hu, Meng Tang 0001, Pascal Mettes, Deli Zhao, Cees Snoek |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2020 | FroDO: From Detections to 3D ObjectsabstractObject-oriented maps are important for scene understanding since they jointly capture geometry and semantics, allow individual instantiation and meaningful reasoning about objects. We introduce FroDO, a method for accurate 3D reconstruction of object instances from RGB video that infers their location, pose and shape in a coarse to fine manner. Key to FroDO is to embed object shapes in a novel learnt shape space that allows seamless switching between sparse point cloud and dense DeepSDF decoding. Given an input sequence of localized RGB frames, FroDO first aggregates 2D detections to instantiate a 3D bounding box per object. A shape code is regressed using an encoder network before optimizing shape and pose further under the learnt shape priors using sparse or dense shape representations. The optimization uses multi-view geometric, photometric and silhouette losses. We evaluate on real-world datasets, including Pix3D, Redwood-OS, and ScanNet, for single-view, multi-view, and multi-object reconstruction. Martin Rünz, Kejie Li, Meng Tang 0001, Lingni Ma, Chen Kong, Tanner Schmidt, Ian D. Reid 0001, Lourdes Agapito, Julian Straub, Steven Lovegrove, Richard A. Newcombe |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2019 | Beyond Gradient Descent for Regularized Segmentation LossesabstractThe simplicity of gradient descent (GD) made it the default method for training ever-deeper and complex neural networks. Both loss functions and architectures are often explicitly tuned to be amenable to this basic local optimization. In the context of weakly-supervised CNN segmentation, we demonstrate a well-motivated loss function where an alternative optimizer (ADM) achieves the state-of-the-art while GD performs poorly. Interestingly, GD obtains its best result for a "smoother" tuning of the loss function. The results are consistent across different network architectures. Our loss is motivated by well-understood MRF/CRF regularization models in "shallow" segmentation and their known global solvers. Our work suggests that network design/training should pay more attention to optimization methods. Dmitrii Marin, Meng Tang 0001, Ismail Ben Ayed, Yuri Boykov |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2019 | Kernel Cuts: Kernel and Spectral Clustering Meet Regularization
Meng Tang 0001, Dmitrii Marin, Ismail Ben Ayed, Yuri Boykov |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2019 | Constrained-CNN losses for weakly supervised segmentation
Hoel Kervadec, Jose Dolz, Meng Tang 0001, Eric Granger, Yuri Boykov, Ismail Ben Ayed |
Medical Image Anal. | 3 |
| 2019 | Kernel Clustering: Density Biases and SolutionsabstractKernel methods are popular in clustering due to their generality and discriminating power. However, we show that many kernel clustering criteria have density biases theoretically explaining some practically significant artifacts empirically observed in the past. For example, we provide conditions and formally prove the density mode isolation bias in kernel K-means for a common class of kernels. We call it Breiman's bias due to its similarity to the histogram mode isolation previously discovered by Breiman in decision tree learning with Gini impurity. We also extend our analysis to other popular kernel clustering methods, e.g., average/normalized cut or dominant sets, where density biases can take different forms. For example, splitting isolated points by cut-based criteria is essentially the sparsest subset bias, which is the opposite of the density mode bias. Our findings suggest that a principled solution for density biases in kernel clustering should directly address data inhomogeneity. We show that density equalization can be implicitly achieved using either locally adaptive weights or locally adaptive kernels. Moreover, density equalization makes many popular kernel clustering objectives equivalent. Our synthetic and real data experiments illustrate density biases and proposed solutions. We anticipate that theoretical understanding of kernel clustering limitations and their principled solutions will be important for a broad spectrum of data analysis applications across the disciplines. Dmitrii Marin, Meng Tang 0001, Ismail Ben Ayed, Yuri Boykov |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2018 | Normalized Cut Loss for Weakly-Supervised CNN SegmentationabstractMost recent semantic segmentation methods train deep convolutional neural networks with fully annotated masks requiring pixel-accuracy for good quality training. Common weakly-supervised approaches generate full masks from partial input (e.g. scribbles or seeds) using standard interactive segmentation methods as preprocessing. But, errors in such masks result in poorer training since standard loss functions (e.g. cross-entropy) do not distinguish seeds from potentially mislabeled other pixels. Inspired by the general ideas in semi-supervised learning, we address these problems via a new principled loss function evaluating network output with criteria standard in "shallow" segmentation, e.g. normalized cut. Unlike prior work, the cross entropy part of our loss evaluates only seeds where labels are known while normalized cut softly evaluates consistency of all pixels. We focus on normalized cut loss where dense Gaussian kernel is efficiently implemented in linear time by fast Bilateral filtering. Our normalized cut loss approach to segmentation brings the quality of weakly-supervised training significantly closer to fully supervised methods. Meng Tang 0001, Abdelaziz Djelouah, Federico Perazzi, Yuri Boykov, Christopher Schroers |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2018 | On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentation
Meng Tang 0001, Federico Perazzi, Abdelaziz Djelouah, Ismail Ben Ayed, Christopher Schroers, Yuri Boykov |
ECCV (16) | 1 |
| 2016 | Normalized Cut Meets MRF
Meng Tang 0001, Dmitrii Marin, Ismail Ben Ayed, Yuri Boykov |
ECCV (2) | 1 |
| 2015 | Secrets of GrabCut and Kernel K-MeansabstractThe log-likelihood energy term in popular model-fitting segmentation methods, e.g. [39, 8, 28, 10], is presented as a generalized "probabilistic K-means" energy [16] for color space clustering. This interpretation reveals some limitations, e.g. over-fitting. We propose an alternative approach to color clustering using kernel K-means energy with well-known properties such as non-linear separation and scalability to higher-dimensional feature spaces. Our bound formulation for kernel K-means allows to combine general pair-wise feature clustering methods with image grid regularization using graph cuts, similarly to standard color model fitting techniques for segmentation. Unlike histogram or GMM fitting [39, 28], our approach is closely related to average association and normalized cut. But, in contrast to previous pairwise clustering algorithms, our approach can incorporate any standard geometric regularization in the image domain. We analyze extreme cases for kernel bandwidth (e.g. Gini bias) and demonstrate effectiveness of KNN-based adaptive bandwidth strategies. Our kernel K-means approach to segmentation benefits from higher-dimensional features where standard model fitting fails. Meng Tang 0001, Ismail Ben Ayed, Dmitrii Marin, Yuri Boykov |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2014 | Pseudo-bound Optimization for Binary Energies
Meng Tang 0001, Ismail Ben Ayed, Yuri Boykov |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2013 | GrabCut in One CutabstractAmong image segmentation algorithms there are two major groups: (a) methods assuming known appearance models and (b) methods estimating appearance models jointly with segmentation. Typically, the first group optimizes appearance log-likelihoods in combination with some spacial regularization. This problem is relatively simple and many methods guarantee globally optimal results. The second group treats model parameters as additional variables transforming simple segmentation energies into high-order NP-hard functionals (Zhu-Yuille, Chan-Vese, Grab Cut, etc). It is known that such methods indirectly minimize the appearance overlap between the segments. We propose a new energy term explicitly measuring L1 distance between the object and background appearance models that can be globally maximized in one graph cut. We show that in many applications our simple term makes NP-hard segmentation functionals unnecessary. Our one cut algorithm effectively replaces approximate iterative optimization techniques based on block coordinate descent. Meng Tang 0001, Lena Gorelick, Olga Veksler, Yuri Boykov |
ICCV | 1 |