Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jason Hsu
dblp:53/5064
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Energy-efficient computing · 65% Embedded and real-time systems · 17% Distributed systems · 13% | |
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy-efficient computing
power management |
0.1 | 3 | 2006 | Harvesting aware power management for sensor networks · DAC 2006 Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems · IPSN 2005 Heliomote: enabling long-lived sensor networks through solar energy harvesting · SenSys 2005 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Heliomote: enabling long-lived sensor networks through solar energy harvesting · SenSys 2005 Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems · IPSN 2005 |
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Harvesting aware power management for sensor networks · DAC 2006 |
Energy-efficient computing
dynamic power scaling |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Harvesting aware power management for sensor networks · DAC 2006 |
Distributed systems › distributed network
sensor networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Harvesting aware power management for sensor networks · DAC 2006 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
energy harvesting |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Heliomote: enabling long-lived sensor networks through solar energy harvesting · SenSys 2005 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › energy management › energy-efficient wireless communication
energy minimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems · IPSN 2005 |
Energy-efficient computing
energy harvesting |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems · IPSN 2005 |
Energy-efficient computing › energy harvesting
solar energy harvesting |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems · IPSN 2005 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Harvesting aware power management for sensor networks · DAC 2006 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource allocation
workload allocation |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Harvesting aware power management for sensor networks · DAC 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
solar energy harvesting · 0.2energy storage management · 0.1spatio-temporal energy profiling · 0.1energy-neutral operation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Design and Implementation of FAITH, An Experimental System to Intercept and Manipulate Online Social InformaticsabstractSocial informatics is the core of Facebook's business and is its most valuable asset which consists of the social graph and the private data of over 500 million users. However, without secure methods of managing this data, Face book has become vulnerable to privacy risks and devaluation. In Facebook's model, users are asked upon access to grant applications the required permissions without sufficient knowledge of the applications' intentions. As a result, if they are deceived, users risk the exposure of sensitive and personal data. This paper presents a system dubbed FAITH (Face book Applications: Identification, Transformation & Hyper visor) to mitigate or eliminate these issues by enhancing the management of social data. First, FAITH allows users to adjust the visibility of their social informatics for each individual application depending on how much they trust the application. Users can configure FAITH to let non-trusted applications run with the least privileges (least amount of social informatics) to minimize potential privacy leaks. Second, FAITH logs the activities of applications to assist users in making more secure decisions. Users can closely monitor each activity performed by applications to adjust their privacy settings more securely. Third, FAITH allows users to transform their social graph such that different applications see different social graphs preventing the formation of friendship inflation caused by applications. The implementation of FAITH only needs the resources and tools available to the public by Face book and requires no further cooperation from the social network. FAITH is a prototype system: the design and concept can be extended to secure other OSNs (Online Social Networks). Currently, FAITH contains thirteen Face book social applications and has been officially released for public usage with approximately two hundred monthly active users as of now. Ruaylong Lee, Roozbeh Nia, Jason Hsu, Karl N. Levitt, Jeff Rowe, Shyhtsun Felix Wu, Shaozhi Ye |
ASONAM | 3 |
| 2007 | Power management in energy harvesting sensor networksabstractPower management is an important concern in sensor networks, because a tethered energy infrastructure is usually not available and an obvious concern is to use the available battery energy efficiently. However, in some of the sensor networking applications, an additional facility is available to ameliorate the energy problem: harvesting energy from the environment. Certain considerations in using an energy harvesting source are fundamentally different from that in using a battery, because, rather than a limit on the maximum energy, it has a limit on the maximum rate at which the energy can be used. Further, the harvested energy availability typically varies with time in a nondeterministic manner. While a deterministic metric, such as residual battery, suffices to characterize the energy availability in the case of batteries, a more sophisticated characterization may be required for a harvesting source. Another issue that becomes important in networked systems with multiple harvesting nodes is that different nodes may have different harvesting opportunity. In a distributed application, the same end-user performance may be achieved using different workload allocations, and resultant energy consumptions at multiple nodes. In this case, it is important to align the workload allocation with the energy availability at the harvesting nodes. We consider the above issues in power management for energy-harvesting sensor networks. We develop abstractions to characterize the complex time varying nature of such sources with analytically tractable models and use them to address key design issues. We also develop distributed methods to efficiently use harvested energy and test these both in simulation and experimentally on an energy-harvesting sensor network, prototyped for this work. Aman Kansal, Jason Hsu, Sadaf Zahedi, Mani Srivastava 0001 |
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. | 2 |
| 2006 | Harvesting aware power management for sensor networksabstractEnergy harvesting offers a promising alternative to solve the sustainability limitations arising from battery size constraints in sensor networks. Several considerations in using an environmental energy source are fundamentally different from using batteries. Rather than a limit on the total energy, harvesting transducers impose a limit on the instantaneous power available. Further, environmental energy availability is often highly variable and a deterministic metric such as residual battery capacity is not available to characterize the energy source. The different nodes in a sensor network may also have different energy harvesting opportunities. Since the same end-user performance may be achieved using different workload allocations at multiple nodes, it is important to adapt the workload allocation to the spatio-temporal energy availability profile in order to enable energy-neutral operation of the network. This paper describes power management techniques for such energy harvesting sensor networks. Platform design considerations as well as power scaling techniques at the node-level and network-level are described. Aman Kansal, Jason Hsu, Mani Srivastava 0001, Vijay Raghunathan |
DAC | 2 |
| 2006 | Adaptive duty cycling for energy harvesting systemsabstractHarvesting energy from the environment is feasible in many applications to ameliorate the energy limitations in sensor networks. In this paper, we present an adaptive duty cycling algorithm that allows energy harvesting sensor nodes to autonomously adjust their duty cycle according to the energy availability in the environment. The algorithm has three objectives, namely (a) achieving energy neutral operation, i.e., energy consumption should not be more than the energy provided by the environment, (b) maximizing the system performance based on an application utility model subject to the above energy-neutrality constraint, and (c) adapting to the dynamics of the energy source at run-time. We present a model that enables harvesting sensor nodes to predict future energy opportunities based on historical data. We also derive an upper bound on the maximum achievable performance assuming perfect knowledge about the future behavior of the energy source. Our methods are evaluated using data gathered from a prototype solar energy harvesting platform and we show that our algorithm can utilize up to 58% more environmental energy compared to the case when harvesting-aware power management is not used. Jason Hsu, Sadaf Zahedi, Aman Kansal, Mani Srivastava 0001, Vijay Raghunathan |
ISLPED | 1 |
| 2005 | Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systemsabstractSustainable operation of battery powered wireless embedded systems (such as sensor nodes) is a key challenge, and considerable research effort has been devoted to energy optimization of such systems. Environmental energy harvesting, in particular solar based, has emerged as a viable technique to supplement battery supplies. However, designing an efficient solar harvesting system to realize the potential benefits of energy harvesting requires an in-depth understanding of several factors. For example, solar energy supply is highly time varying and may not always be sufficient to power the embedded system. Harvesting components, such as solar panels, and energy storage elements, such as batteries or ultracapacitors, have different voltage-current characteristics, which must be matched to each other as well as the energy requirements of the system to maximize harvesting efficiency. Further, battery non-idealities, such as self-discharge and round trip efficiency, directly affect energy usage and storage decisions. The ability of the system to modulate its power consumption by selectively deactivating its sub-components also impacts the overall power management architecture. This paper describes key issues and tradeoffs which arise in the design of solar energy harvesting, wireless embedded systems and presents the design, implementation, and performance evaluation of Heliomote, our prototype that addresses several of these issues. Experimental results demonstrate that Heliomote, which behaves as a plug-in to the Berkeley/Crossbow motes and autonomously manages energy harvesting and storage, enables near-perpetual, harvesting aware operation of the sensor node. Vijay Raghunathan, Aman Kansal, Jason Hsu, Jonathan Friedman, Mani Srivastava 0001 |
IPSN | 3 |
| 2005 | Heliomote: enabling long-lived sensor networks through solar energy harvestingabstractNo abstract available. Kris Lin, Jennifer Yu, Jason Hsu, Sadaf Zahedi, Jonathan Friedman, Aman Kansal, Vijay Raghunathan, Mani Srivastava 0001 |
SenSys | 3 |