Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Uri Shaham 0002

dblp:53/5153-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5928-4269ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 61% Machine translation · 14% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 14%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.712023
Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task Descriptions · ACL (1) 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
interference
0.712023
Causes and Cures for Interference in Multilingual Translation · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
multilingual neural machine translation
0.712023
Causes and Cures for Interference in Multilingual Translation · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
long document understanding
0.612022
SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison Over Long Language Sequences · EMNLP 2022
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.612022
SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison Over Long Language Sequences · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
cryptic crossword solving
0.512021
Cryptonite: A Cryptic Crossword Benchmark for Extreme Ambiguity in Language · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.512021
Cryptonite: A Cryptic Crossword Benchmark for Extreme Ambiguity in Language · EMNLP (1) 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
puzzle solving
0.512021
Cryptonite: A Cryptic Crossword Benchmark for Extreme Ambiguity in Language · EMNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

benchmark construction · 1.1sampling temperature tuning · 0.7prompting · 0.7execution-based evaluation · 0.7rule-based solver · 0.5fine-tuning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Causes and Cures for Interference in Multilingual Translation
abstract
Multilingual machine translation models can benefit from synergy between different language pairs, but also suffer from interference.While there is a growing number of sophisticated methods that aim to eliminate interference, our understanding of interference as a phenomenon is still limited.This work identifies the main factors that contribute to interference in multilingual machine translation.Through systematic experimentation, we find that interference (or synergy) are primarily determined by model size, data size, and the proportion of each language pair within the total dataset.We observe that substantial interference occurs mainly when the model is very small with respect to the available training data, and that using standard transformer configurations with less than one billion parameters largely alleviates interference and promotes synergy.Moreover, we show that tuning the sampling temperature to control the proportion of each language pair in the data is key to balancing the amount of interference between low and high resource language pairs effectively, and can lead to superior performance overall.
Uri Shaham 0002, Maha Elbayad, Vedanuj Goswami, Omer Levy, Shruti Bhosale
ACL (1)1
2023 Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task Descriptions
abstract
Large language models are able to perform a task by conditioning on a few input-output demonstrations -a paradigm known as incontext learning.We show that language models can explicitly infer an underlying task from a few demonstrations by prompting them to generate a natural language instruction that fits the examples.To explore this ability, we introduce the instruction induction challenge, compile a dataset consisting of 24 tasks, and define a novel evaluation metric based on executing the generated instruction.We discover that, to a large extent, the ability to generate instructions does indeed emerge when using a model that is both large enough and aligned to follow instructions; InstructGPT achieves 65.7% of human performance in our execution-based metric, while the original GPT-3 model reaches only 9.8% of human performance.This surprising result suggests that instruction induction might be a viable learning paradigm in and of itself, where instead of fitting a set of latent continuous parameters to the data, one searches for the best description in the natural language hypothesis space. 1
Or Honovich, Uri Shaham 0002, Samuel R. Bowman, Omer Levy
ACL (1)2
2023 Efficient Long-Text Understanding with Short-Text Models
abstract
Abstract Transformer-based pretrained language models (LMs) are ubiquitous across natural language understanding, but cannot be applied to long sequences such as stories, scientific articles, and long documents due to their quadratic complexity. While a myriad of efficient transformer variants have been proposed, they are typically based on custom implementations that require expensive pretraining from scratch. In this work, we propose SLED: SLiding-Encoder and Decoder, a simple approach for processing long sequences that re-uses and leverages battle-tested short-text pretrained LMs. Specifically, we partition the input into overlapping chunks, encode each with a short-text LM encoder and use the pretrained decoder to fuse information across chunks (fusion-in-decoder). We illustrate through controlled experiments that SLED offers a viable strategy for long text understanding and evaluate our approach on SCROLLS, a benchmark with seven datasets across a wide range of language understanding tasks. We find that SLED is competitive with specialized models that are up to 50x larger and require a dedicated and expensive pretraining step.
Maor Ivgi, Uri Shaham 0002, Jonathan Berant
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2
2022 SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison Over Long Language Sequences
abstract
Uri Shaham, Elad Segal, Maor Ivgi, Avia Efrat, Ori Yoran, Adi Haviv, Ankit Gupta, Wenhan Xiong, Mor Geva, Jonathan Berant, Omer Levy. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
Uri Shaham 0002, Elad Segal, Maor Ivgi, Avia Efrat, Ori Yoran, Adi Haviv, Ankit Gupta 0001, Wenhan Xiong, Mor Geva, Jonathan Berant, Omer Levy
EMNLP1
2021 Cryptonite: A Cryptic Crossword Benchmark for Extreme Ambiguity in Language
abstract
Current NLP datasets targeting ambiguity can be solved by a native speaker with relative ease.We present Cryptonite, a large-scale dataset based on cryptic crosswords, which is both linguistically complex and naturally sourced.Each example in Cryptonite is a cryptic clue, a short phrase or sentence with a misleading surface reading, whose solving requires disambiguating semantic, syntactic, and phonetic wordplays, as well as world knowledge.Cryptic clues pose a challenge even for experienced solvers, though top-tier experts can solve them with almost 100% accuracy.Cryptonite is a challenging task for current models; fine-tuning T5-Large on 470k cryptic clues achieves only 7.6% accuracy, on par with the accuracy of a rule-based clue solver (8.6%).
Avia Efrat, Uri Shaham 0002, Dan Kilman, Omer Levy
EMNLP (1)2
2021 Neural Machine Translation without Embeddings
abstract
Many NLP models operate over sequences of subword tokens produced by hand-crafted tokenization rules and heuristic subword induction algorithms.A simple universal alternative is to represent every computerized text as a sequence of bytes via UTF-8, obviating the need for an embedding layer since there are fewer token types (256) than dimensions.Surprisingly, replacing the ubiquitous embedding layer with one-hot representations of each byte does not hurt performance; experiments on byte-to-byte machine translation from English to 10 different languages show a consistent improvement in BLEU, rivaling character-level and even standard subwordlevel models.A deeper investigation reveals that the combination of embeddingless models with decoder-input dropout amounts to token dropout, which benefits byte-to-byte models in particular. 1
Uri Shaham 0002, Omer Levy
NAACL-HLT1