Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Uri Shaham 0002
dblp:53/5153-2
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5928-4269ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 61% Machine translation · 14% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task Descriptions · ACL (1) 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
interference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Causes and Cures for Interference in Multilingual Translation · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
multilingual neural machine translation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Causes and Cures for Interference in Multilingual Translation · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
long document understanding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison Over Long Language Sequences · EMNLP 2022 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison Over Long Language Sequences · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
cryptic crossword solving |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Cryptonite: A Cryptic Crossword Benchmark for Extreme Ambiguity in Language · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Cryptonite: A Cryptic Crossword Benchmark for Extreme Ambiguity in Language · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
puzzle solving |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Cryptonite: A Cryptic Crossword Benchmark for Extreme Ambiguity in Language · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmark construction · 1.1sampling temperature tuning · 0.7prompting · 0.7execution-based evaluation · 0.7rule-based solver · 0.5fine-tuning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Causes and Cures for Interference in Multilingual TranslationabstractMultilingual machine translation models can benefit from synergy between different language pairs, but also suffer from interference.While there is a growing number of sophisticated methods that aim to eliminate interference, our understanding of interference as a phenomenon is still limited.This work identifies the main factors that contribute to interference in multilingual machine translation.Through systematic experimentation, we find that interference (or synergy) are primarily determined by model size, data size, and the proportion of each language pair within the total dataset.We observe that substantial interference occurs mainly when the model is very small with respect to the available training data, and that using standard transformer configurations with less than one billion parameters largely alleviates interference and promotes synergy.Moreover, we show that tuning the sampling temperature to control the proportion of each language pair in the data is key to balancing the amount of interference between low and high resource language pairs effectively, and can lead to superior performance overall. Uri Shaham 0002, Maha Elbayad, Vedanuj Goswami, Omer Levy, Shruti Bhosale |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task DescriptionsabstractLarge language models are able to perform a task by conditioning on a few input-output demonstrations -a paradigm known as incontext learning.We show that language models can explicitly infer an underlying task from a few demonstrations by prompting them to generate a natural language instruction that fits the examples.To explore this ability, we introduce the instruction induction challenge, compile a dataset consisting of 24 tasks, and define a novel evaluation metric based on executing the generated instruction.We discover that, to a large extent, the ability to generate instructions does indeed emerge when using a model that is both large enough and aligned to follow instructions; InstructGPT achieves 65.7% of human performance in our execution-based metric, while the original GPT-3 model reaches only 9.8% of human performance.This surprising result suggests that instruction induction might be a viable learning paradigm in and of itself, where instead of fitting a set of latent continuous parameters to the data, one searches for the best description in the natural language hypothesis space. 1 Or Honovich, Uri Shaham 0002, Samuel R. Bowman, Omer Levy |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | Efficient Long-Text Understanding with Short-Text ModelsabstractAbstract Transformer-based pretrained language models (LMs) are ubiquitous across natural language understanding, but cannot be applied to long sequences such as stories, scientific articles, and long documents due to their quadratic complexity. While a myriad of efficient transformer variants have been proposed, they are typically based on custom implementations that require expensive pretraining from scratch. In this work, we propose SLED: SLiding-Encoder and Decoder, a simple approach for processing long sequences that re-uses and leverages battle-tested short-text pretrained LMs. Specifically, we partition the input into overlapping chunks, encode each with a short-text LM encoder and use the pretrained decoder to fuse information across chunks (fusion-in-decoder). We illustrate through controlled experiments that SLED offers a viable strategy for long text understanding and evaluate our approach on SCROLLS, a benchmark with seven datasets across a wide range of language understanding tasks. We find that SLED is competitive with specialized models that are up to 50x larger and require a dedicated and expensive pretraining step. Maor Ivgi, Uri Shaham 0002, Jonathan Berant |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2022 | SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison Over Long Language SequencesabstractUri Shaham, Elad Segal, Maor Ivgi, Avia Efrat, Ori Yoran, Adi Haviv, Ankit Gupta, Wenhan Xiong, Mor Geva, Jonathan Berant, Omer Levy. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022. Uri Shaham 0002, Elad Segal, Maor Ivgi, Avia Efrat, Ori Yoran, Adi Haviv, Ankit Gupta 0001, Wenhan Xiong, Mor Geva, Jonathan Berant, Omer Levy |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2021 | Cryptonite: A Cryptic Crossword Benchmark for Extreme Ambiguity in LanguageabstractCurrent NLP datasets targeting ambiguity can be solved by a native speaker with relative ease.We present Cryptonite, a large-scale dataset based on cryptic crosswords, which is both linguistically complex and naturally sourced.Each example in Cryptonite is a cryptic clue, a short phrase or sentence with a misleading surface reading, whose solving requires disambiguating semantic, syntactic, and phonetic wordplays, as well as world knowledge.Cryptic clues pose a challenge even for experienced solvers, though top-tier experts can solve them with almost 100% accuracy.Cryptonite is a challenging task for current models; fine-tuning T5-Large on 470k cryptic clues achieves only 7.6% accuracy, on par with the accuracy of a rule-based clue solver (8.6%). Avia Efrat, Uri Shaham 0002, Dan Kilman, Omer Levy |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2021 | Neural Machine Translation without EmbeddingsabstractMany NLP models operate over sequences of subword tokens produced by hand-crafted tokenization rules and heuristic subword induction algorithms.A simple universal alternative is to represent every computerized text as a sequence of bytes via UTF-8, obviating the need for an embedding layer since there are fewer token types (256) than dimensions.Surprisingly, replacing the ubiquitous embedding layer with one-hot representations of each byte does not hurt performance; experiments on byte-to-byte machine translation from English to 10 different languages show a consistent improvement in BLEU, rivaling character-level and even standard subwordlevel models.A deeper investigation reveals that the combination of embeddingless models with decoder-input dropout amounts to token dropout, which benefits byte-to-byte models in particular. 1 Uri Shaham 0002, Omer Levy |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |