VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Manuela Vasconcelos
dblp:53/5209
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 40% Image recognition and object detection · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Natural Image Statistics and Low-Complexity Feature Selection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Natural Image Statistics and Low-Complexity Feature Selection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Weakly Supervised Top-down Image Segmentation · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › model-based segmentation
top-down segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Weakly Supervised Top-down Image Segmentation · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
weakly supervised semantic segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Weakly Supervised Top-down Image Segmentation · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › feature selection
discriminative feature selection |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Scalable Discriminant Feature Selection for Image Retrieval and Recognition · CVPR (2) 2004 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
visual recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Scalable Discriminant Feature Selection for Image Retrieval and Recognition · CVPR (2) 2004 |
Information retrieval
image retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Scalable Discriminant Feature Selection for Image Retrieval and Recognition · CVPR (2) 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information-theoretic feature selection · 0.2decomposability order analysis · 0.2feature selection · 0.1weak supervision · 0.1bottom-up segmentation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Natural Image Statistics and Low-Complexity Feature SelectionabstractLow-complexity feature selection is analyzed in the context of visual recognition. It is hypothesized that high-order dependences of bandpass features contain little information for discrimination of natural images. This hypothesis is characterized formally by the introduction of the concepts of conjunctive interference and decomposability order of a feature set. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the feasibility of low-complexity feature selection are then derived in terms of these concepts. It is shown that the intrinsic complexity of feature selection is determined by the decomposability order of the feature set and not its dimension. Feature selection algorithms are then derived for all levels of complexity and are shown to be approximated by existing information-theoretic methods, which they consistently outperform. The new algorithms are also used to objectively test the hypothesis of low decomposability order through comparison of classification performance. It is shown that, for image classification, the gain of modeling feature dependencies has strongly diminishing returns: best results are obtained under the assumption of decomposability order 1. This suggests a generic law for bandpass features extracted from natural images: that the effect, on the dependence of any two features, of observing any other feature is constant across image classes. Manuela Vasconcelos, Nuno Vasconcelos |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2006 | Weakly Supervised Top-down Image SegmentationabstractThere has recently been significant interest in top-down image segmentation methods, which incorporate the recognition of visual concepts as an intermediate step of segmentation. This work addresses the problem of top-down segmentation with weak supervision. Under this framework, learning does not require a set of manually segmented examples for each concept of interest, but simply a weakly labeled training set. This is a training set where images are annotated with a set of keywords describing their contents, but visual concepts are not explicitly segmented and no correspondence is specified between keywords and image regions. We demonstrate, both analytically and empirically, that weakly supervised segmentation is feasible when certain conditions hold. We also propose a simple weakly supervised segmentation algorithm that extends state-of-theart bottom-up segmentation methods in the direction of perceptually meaningful segmentation1. Manuela Vasconcelos, Nuno Vasconcelos, Gustavo Carneiro 0001 |
CVPR (1) | 1 |
| 2004 | Scalable Discriminant Feature Selection for Image Retrieval and Recognition
Nuno Vasconcelos, Manuela Vasconcelos |
CVPR (2) | 2 |