Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Benny Rousso

dblp:53/704 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
0000-0003-1514-9097ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
3D vision · 95% Video understanding and tracking · 5%
Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Computational photography and imaging · 74% Image and video processing · 26%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
ego-motion estimation
0.131998
Varying Focal Length Self-Calibration and Pose Estimation from Two Images · CVPR 1998
Recovery of Ego-Motion Using Region Alignment · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Recovery of ego-motion using image stabilization · CVPR 1994
Computational photography and imaging
image stitching
0.022000
Mosaicing on Adaptive Manifolds · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2000
Universal Mosaicing using Pipe Projection · ICCV 1998
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
camera motion estimation
0.022000
Mosaicing on Adaptive Manifolds · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2000
Recovery of Ego-Motion Using Region Alignment · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation
0.021998
Varying Focal Length Self-Calibration and Pose Estimation from Two Images · CVPR 1998
Robust Recovery of Camera Rotation from Three Frames · CVPR 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.031998
Recovery of Ego-Motion Using Region Alignment · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Varying Focal Length Self-Calibration and Pose Estimation from Two Images · CVPR 1998
Robust Recovery of Camera Rotation from Three Frames · CVPR 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration
0.011998
Varying Focal Length Self-Calibration and Pose Estimation from Two Images · CVPR 1998
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
self-calibration
0.011998
Varying Focal Length Self-Calibration and Pose Estimation from Two Images · CVPR 1998
Computational photography and imaging › image stitching
video mosaicing
0.011998
Universal Mosaicing using Pipe Projection · ICCV 1998
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.011997
Recovery of Ego-Motion Using Region Alignment · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera pose estimation
camera rotation estimation
0.011996
Robust Recovery of Camera Rotation from Three Frames · CVPR 1996
Image and video processing
image stabilization
0.011994
Recovery of ego-motion using image stabilization · CVPR 1994
Image and video processing
motion estimation
0.011994
Computing occluding and transparent motions · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1994
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
multi-object tracking
0.011992
Detecting and Tracking Multiple Moving Objects Using Temporal Integration · ECCV 1992
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.011994
Computing occluding and transparent motions · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1994
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
motion detection
0.011992
Detecting and Tracking Multiple Moving Objects Using Temporal Integration · ECCV 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adaptive manifold projection · 0.1homography · 0.0focus of expansion · 0.0image registration · 0.0view interpolation · 0.0trifocal tensor · 0.0optical flow · 0.0fundamental matrix · 0.0region alignment · 0.0epipolar field · 0.0trilinear tensor · 0.0linear computation · 0.0transparency modeling · 0.0motion analysis · 0.0focus-of-expansion · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Mosaicing on Adaptive Manifolds
abstract
Image mosaicing is commonly used to increase the visual field of view by pasting together many images or video frames. Existing mosaicing methods are based on projecting all images onto a predetermined single manifold: A plane is commonly used for a camera translating sideways, a cylinder is used for a panning camera, and a sphere is used for a camera which is both panning and tilting. While different mosaicing methods should therefore be used for different types of camera motion, more general types of camera motion, such as forward motion, are practically impossible for traditional mosaicing. A new methodology to allow image mosaicing in more general cases of camera motion is presented. Mosaicing is performed by projecting thin strips from the images onto manifolds which are adapted to the camera motion. While the limitations of existing mosaicing techniques are a result of using predetermined manifolds, the use of more general manifolds overcomes these limitations.
Shmuel Peleg, Benny Rousso, Alex Rav-Acha, Assaf Zomet
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1998 Varying Focal Length Self-Calibration and Pose Estimation from Two Images
abstract
This paper presents a self-calibration and pose estimation method that uses two cameras which only differ by focal length. The estimation of the rotation and focal lengths is independent of the translation recovery. Unlike most methods, we do not initialize our recovery with the projective camera. Instead we estimate the ego-motion and calibration from 3 homographies. These homographies can be easily obtained from a fundamental matrix or a trifocal tensor.
Benny Rousso, Erez Shilat
CVPR1
1998 Universal Mosaicing using Pipe Projection
abstract
Video mosaicing is commonly used to increase the visual field by pasting together many video frames. Existing mosaicing methods are effective only in very limited cases where the image motion is almost a uniform translation or the camera performs a pure pan. Forward camera motion or camera zoom are very problematic for traditional mosaicing. A mosaicing methodology to allow image mosaicing in the most general cases is presented, where frames in the video sequence are transformed such that the optical flow becomes parallel. This transformation is an oblique projection of the image into a "viewing pipe" whose central axis is the trajectory of the camera. The "pipe projection" enables to define high quality mosaicing even for the most challenging cases of forward motion and of zoom. In addition view interpolation, generating dense intermediate views is used to overcome parallax effects.
Benny Rousso, Shmuel Peleg, Ilan Finci, Alex Rav-Acha
ICCV1
1997 Video Mosaicing using Manifold Projection
Benny Rousso, Shmuel Peleg, Ilan Finci
BMVC1
1997 Recovery of Ego-Motion Using Region Alignment
abstract
A method for computing the 3D camera motion (the ego-motion) in a static scene is described, where initially a detected 2D motion between two frames is used to align corresponding image regions. We prove that such a 2D registration removes all effects of camera rotation, even for those image regions that remain misaligned. The resulting residual parallax displacement field between the two region-aligned images is an epipolar field centered at the FOE (Focus-of-Expansion). The 3D camera translation is recovered from the epipolar field. The 3D camera rotation is recovered from the computed 3D translation and the detected 2D motion. The decomposition of image motion into a 2D parametric motion and residual epipolar parallax displacements avoids many of the inherent ambiguities and instabilities associated with decomposing the image motion into its rotational and translational components, and hence makes the computation of ego-motion or 3D structure estimation more robust.
Michal Irani, Benny Rousso, Shmuel Peleg
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1996 Robust Recovery of Camera Rotation from Three Frames
abstract
Computing camera rotation from image sequences can be used for image stabilization, and when the camera rotation is known the computation of translation and scene structure are much simplified as well. A robust approach for recovering camera rotation is presented, which does not assume any specific scene structure (e.g. no planar surface is required), and which avoids prior computation of the epipole. Given two images taken from two different viewing positions, the rotation matrix between the images can be computed from any three homography matrices. The homographies are computed using the trilinear tensor which describes the relations between the projections of a 3D point into three images. The entire computation is linear for small angles, and is therefore fast and stable. Iterating the linear computation can then be used to recover larger rotations as well.
Benny Rousso, Shai Avidan, Amnon Shashua, Shmuel Peleg
CVPR1
1994 Recovery of ego-motion using image stabilization
abstract
A method for computing the 3D camera motion (the ego-motion) in a static scene is introduced, which is based on computing the 2D image motion of a single image region directly from image intensities. The computed image motion of this image region is used to register the images so that the detected image region appears stationary. The resulting displacement field for the entire scene between the registered frames is affected only by the 3D translation of the camera. After canceling the effects of the camera rotation by using such 2D image registration, the 3D camera translation is computed by finding the focus-of-expansion in the translation-only set of registered frames. This step is followed by computing the camera rotation to complete the computation of the ego-motion. The presented method avoids the inherent problems in the computation of optical flow and of feature matching, and does not assume any prior feature detection or feature correspondence.>
Michal Irani, Benny Rousso, Shmuel Peleg
CVPR2
1994 Computing occluding and transparent motions
Michal Irani, Benny Rousso, Shmuel Peleg
Int. J. Comput. Vis.2
1993 Robust Recovery of Ego-Motion
Michal Irani, Benny Rousso, Shmuel Peleg
CAIP2
1992 Detecting and Tracking Multiple Moving Objects Using Temporal Integration
Michal Irani, Benny Rousso, Shmuel Peleg
ECCV2