Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philip Stutz

dblp:53/8838 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Graph data management · 46% Data mining · 23% Web and social media mining · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph data management
graph query
0.212015
Random Walk TripleRush: Asynchronous Graph Querying and Sampling · WWW 2015
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
graph sampling
0.212015
Random Walk TripleRush: Asynchronous Graph Querying and Sampling · WWW 2015
Web and social media mining › social network sampling
random walk sampling
0.212015
Random Walk TripleRush: Asynchronous Graph Querying and Sampling · WWW 2015
Graph data management › graph query processing
SPARQL query evaluation
0.212015
Random Walk TripleRush: Asynchronous Graph Querying and Sampling · WWW 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random walk · 0.2asynchronous graph exploration · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Cuilt: A Scalable, Mix-and-Match Framework for Local Iterative Approximate Best-Response Algorithms
abstract
We implement CUILT, a scalable mix-and-match framework for Local Iterative Approximate Best-Response Algorithms for DCOPs, using the graph processing framework SIGNAL/COLLECT, where each agent is modeled as a vertex and communication pathways are represented as edges. Choosing this abstraction allows us to exploit the generic graph-oriented distribution/optimization heuristics and makes our proposed framework scalable, configurable, as well as extensible. We found that this approach allows us to scale to problems more than 3 orders of magnitude larger than results commonly published so far, to easily create hybrid algorithms by mixing components, and to run the algorithms fast, in a parallel fashion.
Mihaela Verman, Philip Stutz, Robin Hafen, Abraham Bernstein
ECAI2
2015 Random Walk TripleRush: Asynchronous Graph Querying and Sampling
abstract
Most Semantic Web applications rely on querying graphs, typically by using SPARQL with a triple store. Increasingly, applications also analyze properties of the graph structure to compute statistical inferences. The current Semantic Web infrastructure, however, does not efficiently support such operations. This forces developers to extract the relevant data for external statistical post-processing. In this paper we propose to rethink query execution in a triple store as a highly parallelized asynchronous graph exploration on an active index data structure. This approach also allows to integrate SPARQL-querying with the sampling of graph properties.
Philip Stutz, Bibek Paudel, Mihaela Verman, Abraham Bernstein
WWW1
2015 foxPSL: A Fast, Optimized and eXtended PSL implementation
abstract
In this paper, we describe foxPSL , a fast, optimized and extended implementation of Probabilistic Soft Logic (PSL) based on the distributed graph processing framework Signal/Collect . PSL is one of the leading formalisms of statistical relational learning, a recently developed field of machine learning that aims at representing both uncertainty and rich relational structures, usually by combining logical representations with probabilistic graphical models. PSL can be seen as both a probabilistic logic and a template language for hinge-loss Markov Random Fields, a type of continuous Markov Random fields (MRF) in which Maximum a Posteriori inference is very efficient, since it can be formulated as a constrained convex minimization problem, as opposed to a discrete optimization problem for standard MRFs. From the logical perspective, a key feature of PSL is the capability to represent soft truth values, allowing the expression of complex domain knowledge, like degrees of truth, in parallel with uncertainty. foxPSL supports the full PSL pipeline from problem definition to a distributed solver that implements the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) consensus optimization. It provides a Domain Specific Language that extends standard PSL with a class system and existential quantifiers, allowing for efficient grounding. Moreover, it implements a series of configurable optimizations, like optimized grounding of constraints and lazy inference, that improve grounding and inference time. We perform an extensive evaluation, comparing the performance of foxPSL to a state-of-the-art implementation of ADMM consensus optimization in GraphLab, and show an improvement in both inference time and solution quality. Moreover, we evaluate the impact of the optimizations on the execution time and discuss the trade-offs related to each optimization.
Sara Magliacane, Philip Stutz, Paul Groth, Abraham Bernstein
Int. J. Approx. Reason.2
2010 Signal/Collect: Graph Algorithms for the (Semantic) Web
Philip Stutz, Abraham Bernstein, William W. Cohen
ISWC (1)1