Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Konrad Groh

dblp:54/10556 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation
conditional image generation
0.912025
LumiNet: Latent Intrinsics Meets Diffusion Models for Indoor Scene Relighting · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
LumiNet: Latent Intrinsics Meets Diffusion Models for Indoor Scene Relighting · CVPR 2025
Computational photography and imaging
image relighting
0.912025
LumiNet: Latent Intrinsics Meets Diffusion Models for Indoor Scene Relighting · CVPR 2025
Computational photography and imaging
intrinsic image decomposition
0.312025
LumiNet: Latent Intrinsics Meets Diffusion Models for Indoor Scene Relighting · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cross-attention · 1.7controlnet · 1.7StyleGAN · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 LumiNet: Latent Intrinsics Meets Diffusion Models for Indoor Scene Relighting
abstract
We introduce LumiNet, a novel architecture that leverages generative models and latent intrinsic representations for transferring lighting from one image to another. Given a source image and a target lighting image, LumiNet generates a relit version of the source scene that captures the target’s lighting. Our approach makes two key contributions: a data curation strategy from the StyleGAN-based relighting model for our training, and a modified diffusion-based Con-trolNet that processes both latent intrinsic properties from the source image and latent extrinsic properties from the target image. We further improve lighting transfer through a learned adaptor that injects the target’s latent extrinsic properties via cross-attention and light-weight fine-tuning.Unlike traditional ControlNet, which generates images with conditional maps from a single scene, LumiNet processes latent representations from two different images -preserving geometry and albedo from the source while transferring lighting characteristics from the target. Experiments demonstrate that our method successfully transfers complex lighting phenomena including specular highlights and indirect illumination across scenes with varying spatial layouts and materials, outperforming existing approaches on challenging indoor scenes using only images as input.
Xiaoyan Xing, Konrad Groh, Sezer Karaoglu, Theo Gevers, Anand Bhattad
CVPR2
2025 Training-free diffusion for controlling illumination conditions in images
Xiaoyan Xing, Vincent Tao Hu, Jan Hendrik Metzen, Konrad Groh, Sezer Karaoglu, Theo Gevers
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.4
2021 Testing Deep Learning-based Visual Perception for Automated Driving
abstract
Due to the impressive performance of deep neural networks (DNNs) for visual perception, there is an increased demand for their use in automated systems. However, to use deep neural networks in practice, novel approaches are needed, e.g., for testing. In this work, we focus on the question of how to test deep learning-based visual perception functions for automated driving. Classical approaches for testing are not sufficient: A purely statistical approach based on a dataset split is not enough, as testing needs to address various purposes and not only average case performance. Additionally, a complete specification is elusive due to the complexity of the perception task in the open context of automated driving. In this article, we review and discuss existing work on testing DNNs for visual perception with a special focus on automated driving for test input and test oracle generation as well as test adequacy. We conclude that testing of DNNs in this domain requires several diverse test sets. We show how such tests sets can be constructed based on the presented approaches addressing different purposes based on the presented methods and identify open research questions.
Stephanie Abrecht, Lydia Gauerhof, Christoph Gladisch, Konrad Groh, Christian Heinzemann, Matthias Woehrle
ACM Trans. Cyber Phys. Syst.4