Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hien Le

dblp:54/11004 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 60% Algorithms and data structures · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › coordinate descent
block coordinate descent
0.412020
Inertial Block Proximal Methods for Non-Convex Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2020
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization
0.412020
Inertial Block Proximal Methods for Non-Convex Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.412020
Inertial Block Proximal Methods for Non-Convex Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2020
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix factorization › low-rank matrix factorization
nonnegative matrix factorization
0.412020
Inertial Block Proximal Methods for Non-Convex Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
proximal methods
0.412020
Inertial Block Proximal Methods for Non-Convex Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inertial acceleration · 0.4block coordinate descent · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Inertial Block Proximal Methods for Non-Convex Non-Smooth Optimization
abstract
We propose inertial versions of block coordinate descent methods for solving non-convex non-smooth composite optimization problems. Our methods possess three main advantages compared to current state-of-the-art accelerated first-order methods: (1) they allow using two different extrapolation points to evaluate the gradients and to add the inertial force (we will empirically show that it is more efficient than using a single extrapolation point), (2) they allow to randomly select the block of variables to update, and (3) they do not require a restarting step. We prove the subsequential convergence of the generated sequence under mild assumptions, prove the global convergence under some additional assumptions, and provide convergence rates. We deploy the proposed methods to solve non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and show that they compete favorably with the state-of-the-art NMF algorithms. Additional experiments on non-negative approximate canonical polyadic decomposition, also known as nonnegative tensor factorization, are also provided.
Hien Le, Nicolas Gillis, Panagiotis Patrinos
ICML1
2013 Modeling and Verifying Real-Time Properties of Reactive Systems
abstract
SPACE is a model-driven engineering technique for reactive distributed systems. It enables to develop system models from reusable building blocks, formal analysis by model checking as well as automated transformation to executable code. In this paper, we describe an extension of the SPACE formalism which allows to model and verify also real-time behavior. In particular, one specifies real-time constraints in the interface descriptions of the building blocks, so-called Real-Time External State-Machines (RTESMs). The RTESMs are translated to guards, clocks and invariants of Timed Automata which can be analyzed by means of the model checker UPPAAL. The approach is explained by a component protecting an electrical motor controller system against overspeed. In particular, we prove that by keeping certain maximum response times, this system guarantees that the speed of the motor stays within certain limits.
Fenglin Han, Peter Herrmann, Hien Le
ICECCS3