Simon’s factorization theorem is a celebrated tool in algebraic automata theory, providing bounded-depth decompositions of words with respect to morphisms into finite semigroups. We develop an analogue of Simon’s theorem for forests in the setting of forest algebras. In contrast with words, this presents a basic difficulty: recursively factoring a forest requires keeping track of where each subforest "fits". This difficulty ripples throughout the proof, and we overcome it by augmenting the free forest algebra and by developing a framework that supports recursive factorization of forests, along with its semantic implications. Our main result identifies a new semantic restriction on morphisms (called R-alignment) which intuitively ensures that different ways of cutting a forest remain compatible (in a certain sense) at the semigroup level. Under this condition, we prove that every morphism admits decompositions of bounded depth. We also prove that without this restriction, there are morphisms for which no bounded-depth decomposition exists (under our notion of decomposition).

In single-core processors, concurrency requires that multiple processes be interleaved into a single thread of execution by a scheduler. The language-theoretic operation that corresponds to this is the shuffle of two languages: the set of words obtained by interleaving a word from each language in an arbitrary, letter-wise fashion. It is well known that regular languages are closed under shuffles, while context-free languages (CFLs) are not. Following an established line of research, this paper considers shuffles according to regular "trajectories," that is, subject to scheduling constraints expressed by an automaton. Unsurprisingly, some trajectories allow for CFLs to be shuffled into CFLs (e.g., simple concatenation of the two words), while others do not. This paper provides a robust toolset to show that a given trajectory would always shuffle two nonregular CFLs into a nonCFL. In the case of deterministic CFLs (DCFLs), a salient trichotomy of trajectories depending on how they shuffle DCFLs is provided. These results are based on lemmata of independent interest regarding how pushdown automata (PDA) must invoke the stack when accepting a nonregular CFL or DCFL. The latter case relies on a recent result of Jančar and Šíma (MFCS'2021); answering an open question therein, it is demonstrated that said result cannot be generalized to arbitrary CFLs, leading to dedicated machinery for both cases.

Population protocols are a distributed computation model in which a collection of anonymous, finite-state agents interact in randomly chosen pairs and update their states according to a fixed transition function. The computation is defined by the eventual stabilization of the population to a consensus that represents the output. In practice, it is natural to allow each agent to carry a unique identifier and compare it with that of another agent before interacting. We model this extension by having agents be totally ordered and interactions between two agents to be fireable only if their pair of identifiers falls in some condition set. For instance, PP[<] allows for two agents to interact only if the first one appears before the second one. We study population protocols over ordered agents PP[𝒩] where 𝒩 is a set of predicates available to restrict transition firing. We also study IO-PP[𝒩], the immediate observation fragment of PP[𝒩] where only one agent changes state per interaction. Our main result is that IO-PP[<] recognizes exactly the unambiguous star-free languages, which admits many other characterizations, such as two-variable first-order logic or two-way deterministic partially-ordered automata. We also provide a logic and an automaton model that fits in PP[<]. We further show that if the successor predicate appears in a set 𝒩 of NSPACE(n)-computable predicates, then IO-PP[𝒩] = PP[𝒩] = NSPACE(n). Finally, we investigate the problem of deciding whether a given population protocol always stabilizes to a consensus. While this problem is decidable for unordered population protocols, we show that this is undecidable already for PP[<] and IO-PP[+1], but conditionally decidable for IO-PP[<].

One Counter Nets (OCNs) are finite-state automata equipped with a counter that cannot become negative, but cannot be explicitly tested for zero. Their close connection to various other models (e.g., PDAs, Vector Addition Systems, and Counter Automata) make them an attractive modeling tool. The two-way variant of OCNs (2-OCNs) was introduced in the 1980’s and shown to be more expressive than OCNs, so much so that the emptiness problem is undecidable already in the deterministic model (2-DOCNs). In a first part, we study the emptiness problem of natural restrictions of 2-OCNs, under the light of modern results about Vector Addition System with States (VASS). We show that emptiness is decidable for 2-OCNs over bounded languages (i.e., languages contained in a₁^* a₂^* ⋯ a_k^*), and decidable and Ackermann-complete for sweeping 2-OCNs, where the head direction only changes at the end-markers. Both decidability results revolve around reducing the problem to VASS reachability, but they rely on strikingly different approaches. In a second part, we study the expressive power of 2-OCNs, showing an array of connections between bounded languages, sweeping 2-OCNs, and semilinear languages. Most noteworthy among these connections, is that the bounded languages recognized by sweeping 2-OCNs are precisely those that are semilinear. Finally, we establish an intricate pumping lemma for 2-DOCNs and use it to show that there are OCN languages that are not 2-DOCN recognizable, improving on the known result that there are such 2-OCN languages.

It has been observed that transformers with greater depth (that is, more layers) have more capabilities, but can we establish formally which capabilities are gained? We answer this question with a theoretical proof followed by an empirical study. First, we consider transformers that round to fixed precision except inside attention. We show that this subclass of transformers is expressively equivalent to the programming language $\textsf{C}$-$\textsf{RASP}$ and this equivalence preserves depth. Second, we prove that deeper $\textsf{C}$-$\textsf{RASP}$ programs are more expressive than shallower $\textsf{C}$-$\textsf{RASP}$ programs, implying that deeper transformers are more expressive than shallower transformers (within the subclass mentioned above). The same is also proven for transformers with positional encodings (like RoPE and ALiBi). These results are established by studying a temporal logic with counting operators equivalent to $\textsf{C}$-$\textsf{RASP}$. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that our theory predicts the depth required for transformers without positional encodings to length-generalize on a family of sequential dependency tasks.

Abstract Ordered binary decision diagrams (OBDDs) are a fundamental data structure for the manipulation of Boolean functions, with strong applications to finite-state symbolic model checking. OBDDs allow for efficient algorithms using top-down dynamic programming. From an automata-theoretic perspective, OBDDs essentially are minimal deterministic finite automata recognizing languages whose words have a fixed length (the arity of the Boolean function). We introduce weakly acyclic diagrams (WADs), a generalization of OBDDs that maintains their algorithmic advantages, but can also represent infinite languages. We develop the theory of WADs and show that they can be used for symbolic model checking of various models of infinite-state systems.

Abstract We study algorithms for solving parity, mean-payoff and energy games. We propose a systematic framework, which we call Fast value iteration, for describing, comparing, and proving correctness of such algorithms. The approach is based on potential reductions, as introduced by Gurvich, Karzanov and Khachiyan (1988). This framework allows us to provide simple presentations and correctness proofs of known algorithms, unifying the Optimal strategy improvement algorithm by Schewe (2008) and the quasi dominions approach by Benerecetti et al. (2020), amongst others. The new approach also leads to novel symmetric versions of these algorithms, highly efficient in practice, but for which we are unable to prove termination. We report on empirical evaluation, comparing the different fast value iteration algorithms, and showing that they are competitive even to top parity game solvers.

Abstract We study the expressive power of polynomial recursive sequences, a nonlinear extension of the well-known class of linear recursive sequences. These sequences arise naturally in the study of nonlinear extensions of weighted automata, where (non)expressiveness results translate to class separations. A typical example of a polynomial recursive sequence is bn = n!. Our main result is that the sequence un = nn is not polynomial recursive.

Abstract We describe our implementation of downset-manipulating algorithms used to solve the realizability problem for linear temporal logic (LTL). These algorithms were introduced by Filiot et al. in the 2010s and implemented in the tools Acacia and Acacia+ in C and Python. We identify degrees of freedom in the original algorithms and provide a complete rewriting of Acacia in C++20 articulated around genericity and leveraging modern techniques for better performance. These techniques include compile-time specialization of the algorithms, the use of SIMD registers to store vectors, and several preprocessing steps, some relying on efficient Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) libraries. We also explore different data structures to store downsets. The resulting tool is competitive against comparable modern tools.

The regular languages with a neutral letter expressible in first-order logic with one alternation are characterized. Specifically, it is shown that if an arbitrary Σ2 formula defines a regular language with a neutral letter, then there is an equivalent Σ2 formula that only uses the order predicate. This shows that the so-called Central Conjecture of Straubing holds for Σ2 over languages with a neutral letter, the first progress on the Conjecture in more than 20 years. To show the characterization, lower bounds against polynomial-size depth-3 Boolean circuits with constant top fan-in are developed. The heart of the combinatorial argument resides in studying how positions within a language are determined from one another, a technique of independent interest.

We consider the rational subset membership problem for Baumslag-Solitar groups. These groups form a prominent class in the area of algorithmic group theory, and they were recently identified as an obstacle for understanding the rational subsets of $\text{GL}(2,\mathbb{Q})$. We show that rational subset membership for Baumslag-Solitar groups $\text{BS}(1,q)$ with $q\ge 2$ is decidable and PSPACE-complete. To this end, we introduce a word representation of the elements of $\text{BS}(1,q)$: their pointed expansion (PE), an annotated $q$-ary expansion. Seeing subsets of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ as word languages, this leads to a natural notion of PE-regular subsets of $\text{BS}(1, q)$: these are the subsets of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ whose sets of PE are regular languages. Our proof shows that every rational subset of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ is PE-regular. Since the class of PE-regular subsets of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ is well-equipped with closure properties, we obtain further applications of these results. Our results imply that (i) emptiness of Boolean combinations of rational subsets is decidable, (ii) membership to each fixed rational subset of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ is decidable in logarithmic space, and (iii) it is decidable whether a given rational subset is recognizable. In particular, it is decidable whether a given finitely generated subgroup of $\text{BS}(1,q)$ has finite index.

Abstract Discounted-sum games provide a formal model for the study of reinforcement learning, where the agent is enticed to get rewards early since later rewards are discounted. When the agent interacts with the environment, she may realize that, with hindsight, she could have increased her reward by playing differently: this difference in outcomes constitutes her regret value. The agent may thus elect to follow a regret- minimal strategy. In this paper, it is shown that (1) there always exist regret-minimal strategies that are admissible—a strategy being inadmissible if there is another strategy that always performs better; (2) computing the minimum possible regret or checking that a strategy is regret-minimal can be done in "Equation missing", disregarding the computational cost of numerical analysis (otherwise, this bound becomes "Equation missing").

A word-to-word function is continuous for a class of languages V if its inverse maps V languages to V. This notion provides a basis for an algebraic study of transducers, and was integral to the characterization of the sequential transducers computable in some circuit complexity classes. Here, we report on the decidability of continuity for functional transducers and some standard classes of regular languages. Previous algebraic studies of transducers have focused on the structure of the underlying input automaton, disregarding the output. We propose a comparison of the two algebraic approaches through two questions: When are the automaton structure and the continuity properties related, and when does continuity propagate to superclasses?

First-order logic (FO) over words is shown to be equiexpressive with FO equipped with a restricted set of numerical predicates, namely the order, a binary predicate MSB0, and the finite-degree predicates: FO[ARB] = FO[≤, MSB0, FIN]. The Crane Beach Property (CBP), introduced more than a decade ago, is true of a logic if all the expressible languages admitting a neutral letter are regular. Although it is known that FO[ARB] does not have the CBP, it is shown here that the (strong form of the) CBP holds for both FO[≤, FIN] and FO[≤, MSB0]. Thus FO[≤, FIN] exhibits a form of locality and the CBP, and can still express a wide variety of languages, while being one simple predicate away from the expressive power of FO[ARB]. The counting ability of FO[≤, FIN] is studied as an application.