Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexei Y. Kitaev

dblp:54/3091 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 92% Mathematical optimization · 8%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
hidden subgroup problem
0.212014
A quantum algorithm for computing the unit group of an arbitrary degree number field · STOC 2014
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms
0.212014
A quantum algorithm for computing the unit group of an arbitrary degree number field · STOC 2014
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory › hamiltonian complexity
local hamiltonian problem
0.112006
The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem · SIAM J. Comput. 2006
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
QMA-completeness
0.112006
The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem · SIAM J. Comput. 2006
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum complexity classes
0.112006
The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem · SIAM J. Comput. 2006
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › lattice-based cryptography
ideal lattices
0.112014
A quantum algorithm for computing the unit group of an arbitrary degree number field · STOC 2014
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography
0.112014
A quantum algorithm for computing the unit group of an arbitrary degree number field · STOC 2014
Mathematical optimization
integer programming
0.012000
Parallelization, amplification, and exponential time simulation of quantum interactive proof systems · STOC 2000
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
quantum interactive proofs
0.012000
Parallelization, amplification, and exponential time simulation of quantum interactive proof systems · STOC 2000
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum circuit
0.011998
Quantum Circuits with Mixed States · STOC 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantum fourier sampling · 0.4lattice reduction · 0.4perturbation theory · 0.1linear algebra · 0.1trace metric · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 A quantum algorithm for computing the unit group of an arbitrary degree number field
abstract
Computing the group of units in a field of algebraic numbers is one of the central tasks of computational algebraic number theory. It is believed to be hard classically, which is of interest for cryptography. In the quantum setting, efficient algorithms were previously known for fields of constant degree. We give a quantum algorithm that is polynomial in the degree of the field and the logarithm of its discriminant. This is achieved by combining three new results. The first is a classical algorithm for computing a basis for certain ideal lattices with doubly exponentially large generators. The second shows that a Gaussian-weighted superposition of lattice points, with an appropriate encoding, can be used to provide a unique representation of a real-valued lattice. The third is an extension of the hidden subgroup problem to continuous groups and a quantum algorithm for solving the HSP over the group Rn.
Kirsten Eisenträger, Sean Hallgren, Alexei Y. Kitaev, Fang Song 0001
STOC3
2006 The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem
abstract
The k-{\locHam} problem is a natural complete problem for the complexity class $\QMA$, the quantum analogue of $\NP$. It is similar in spirit to {\sc MAX-k-SAT}, which is $\NP$-complete for $k\geq 2$. It was known that the problem is $\QMA$-complete for any $k \geq 3$. On the other hand, 1-{\locHam} is in {\P} and hence not believed to be $\QMA$-complete. The complexity of the 2-{\locHam} problem has long been outstanding. Here we settle the question and show that it is $\QMA$-complete. We provide two independent proofs; our first proof uses only elementary linear algebra. Our second proof uses a powerful technique for analyzing the sum of two Hamiltonians; this technique is based on perturbation theory and we believe that it might prove useful elsewhere. Using our techniques we also show that adiabatic computation with 2-local interactions on qubits is equivalent to standard quantum computation.
Julia Kempe, Alexei Y. Kitaev, Oded Regev 0001
SIAM J. Comput.2
2004 The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem
Julia Kempe, Alexei Y. Kitaev, Oded Regev 0001
FSTTCS2
2000 Parallelization, amplification, and exponential time simulation of quantum interactive proof systems
abstract
In this paper we consider quantum interactive proof systems, which are interactive proof systems in which the prover and verier may perform quantum computations and exchange quantum information. We prove that any polynomial-round quantum interactive proof system with two-sided bounded error can be parallelized to a quantum interactive proof system with exponentially small one-sided error in which the prover and verier exchange only 3 messages. This yields a simplied proof that PSPACE has 3-message quantum interactive proof systems. We also prove that any language having a quantum interactive proof system can be decided in deterministic exponential time, implying that single-prover quantum interactive proof systems are strictly less powerful than multiple-prover classical interactive proof systems unless EXP = NEXP. 1. INTRODUCTION Interactive proof systems were introduced by Babai [3] and Goldwasser, Micali, and Racko [17] in 1985. In the same year, Deutsch [10] gave the rst for...
Alexei Y. Kitaev, John Watrous
STOC1
1998 Quantum Circuits with Mixed States
abstract
Current formal models for quantum computation deal only with unitary gates operating on "pure quantum states". In these models it is difficult or impossible to deal formally with several central issues: measurements in the middle of the computation; decoherence and noise, using probabilistic subroutines, and more. It turns out, that the restriction to unitary gates and pure states is unnecessary. In this paper we generalize the formal model of quantum circuits to a model in which the state can be a general quantum state, namely a mixed state, or a "density matrix", and the gates can be general quantum operations, not necessarily unitary. The new model is shown to be equivalent in computational power to the standard one, and the problems mentioned above essentially disappear. The main result in this paper is a solution for the subroutine problem. The general function that a quantum circuit outputs is a probabilistic function. However, the question of using probabilistic functions as subroutines was not previously dealt with, the reason being that in the language of pure states, this simply can not be done. We define a natural notion of using general subroutines, and show that using general subroutines does not strengthen the model. As an example of the advantages of analyzing quantum complexity using density matrices, we prove a simple lower bound on depth of circuits that compute probabilistic functions. Finally, we deal with the question of inaccurate quantum computation with mixed states. Using the so called "trace metric" on density matrices, we show how to keep track of errors in the new model. Institutes of Physics and Computer science, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel y L.D.Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics,Moscow, Russia z Institute of Compu...
Dorit Aharonov, Alexei Y. Kitaev, Noam Nisan
STOC2