Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Ian P. Jalowiecki

dblp:54/3326 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
associative processor
0.011991
Associative massively parallel computers · Proc. IEEE 1991
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
massively parallel processor
0.011991
Associative massively parallel computers · Proc. IEEE 1991
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel architecture
0.011991
Associative massively parallel computers · Proc. IEEE 1991
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 A programmable processor with 4096 processing units for media applications
abstract
Media data delivery and processing such as telecommunications, networking, video processing, speech recognition and 3D graphics is increasing in importance and will soon dominate the processing cycles consumed in computer-based systems. This paper describes a processor called Linedancer, that provides high media performance with low energy consumption by integrating associative SIMD parallel processing with embedded microprocessor technology. The major innovations in the Linedancer is the integration of thousands of processing units in a single chip that are capable to support software programmable high-performance mathematical functions as well as abstract data processing. In addition to 4096 processing units, Linedancer integrates on a single chip a RISC controller that is an implementation of the SPARC architecture, 128 kbytes of data memory, and I/O interfaces. The SIMD processing in Linedancer implements the ASProCore architecture, which is a proprietary implementation of SIMD processing, operates at 266 MHz with program instructions issued by the RISC controller. The device also integrates a 64-bit synchronous main memory interface operating at 133 MHz (double-data rate, DDR), and a 64-bit 66 MHz PCI interface.
Anargyros Krikelis, Ian P. Jalowiecki, David L. Bean, Ryan Bishop, M. Facey, D. Boughton, S. Murphy, M. Whitaker
ICASSP2
1995 MCM Quality and Cost Analysis Using Economics Models
abstract
This paper presents an economics modelling tool for the analysis of MCM test and known good die strategies. The model calculates actual financial cost in parallel with quality at each stage from die manufacture to MCM assembly, test and rework, resulting in a powerful predictive tool for the evaluation of MCM test strategies. The spectrum of possible analyses which can be performed ranges from the evaluation of different KGD approaches to the analysis of alternative rework on a figure of merit basis. This is a novel approach to MCM strategies.
Chryssa Dislis, A. F. Al-Ani, Ian P. Jalowiecki
ITC3
1991 Associative massively parallel computers
abstract
Associative processing architectures as candidates for second-generation massive parallel computers (MPCs) are discussed. The authors outline the principle of operation of associative processors, and briefly review their development. They explore the associative string processor (ASP) architecture as a representative case study in the development of a second-generation MPC.>
R. Mike Lea, Ian P. Jalowiecki
Proc. IEEE2