We study the computational complexity of explaining preference data through Boolean attribute models (BAMs), motivated by extensive research involving attribute models and their promise in understanding preference structure and enabling more efficient decision-making processes. In a BAM, each alternative possesses a subset of binary attributes, each voter cares about a subset of attributes, and voters prefer alternatives with more of their desired attributes. In the BAM problem, we are given a preference profile and want to know whether there is a k-attribute model explaining the profile. We establish a complexity dichotomy for the number of attributes k: BAM is linear-time solvable for k≤2 but NP-complete for k≥3. The problem remains hard even when preference orders have length two. On the positive side, BAM becomes fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of alternatives m. For the special case of two voters, we provide a linear-time algorithm. We also analyze variants where partial information is given: When voter preferences over attributes are known (BAM With Cares) or when alternative attributes are specified (BAM With Has), showing that for most parameters BAM With Cares is more difficult whereas BAM With Has is more tractable except for being NP-hard even for one voter.

Decision trees are a classic model for summarizing and classifying data. To enhance interpretability and generalization properties, it has been proposed to favor small decision trees. Accordingly, in the minimum-size decision tree training problem (MSDT), the input is a set of training examples in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with class labels and we aim to find a decision tree that classifies all training examples correctly and has a minimum number of nodes. MSDT is NP-hard and therefore presumably not solvable in polynomial time. Nevertheless, a promising algorithmic paradigm called witness trees which solves MSDT efficiently if the solution tree is small has been developed. In this work, we test this paradigm empirically. We provide an implementation, augment it with extensive heuristic improvements, and scrutinize it on standard benchmark instances. The augmentations achieve a mean 324-fold (median 84-fold) speedup over the naive implementation. Compared to the state of the art they achieve a mean 32-fold (median 7-fold) speedup over the dynamic programming based MurTree solver and a mean 61-fold (median 25-fold) speedup over SAT-based implementations. As a theoretical result we obtain an improved worst-case running-time bound for MSDT.

We present a comprehensive classical and parameterized complexity analysis of decision tree pruning operations, extending recent research on the complexity of learning small decision trees. Thereby, we offer new insights into the computational challenges of decision tree simplification, a crucial aspect of developing interpretable and efficient machine learning models. We focus on fundamental pruning operations of subtree replacement and raising, which are used in heuristics. Surprisingly, while optimal pruning can be performed in polynomial time for subtree replacement, the problem is NP-complete for subtree raising. Therefore, we identify parameters and combinations thereof that lead to fixed-parameter tractability or hardness, establishing a precise borderline between these complexity classes. For example, while subtree raising is hard for small domain size $D$ or number $d$ of features, it can be solved in $D^{2d} \cdot |I|^{O(1)}$ time, where $|I|$ is the input size. We complement our theoretical findings with preliminary experimental results, demonstrating the practical implications of our analysis.

Binary decision diagrams (BDDs) are widely applied tools to compactly represent labeled data as directed acyclic graphs; for efficiency and interpretability reasons small BDDs are preferred. Given labeled data, minimizing BDDs is NP-complete and thus recent research focused on the influence of parameters such as the solution size $s$ on the complexity [Ordyniak et al., AAAI 2024]. Our main positive result is an algorithm that is efficient if in particular $s$, the domain size $D$, and the Hamming distance between any two data points is small, improving on previous running-time bounds. This algorithm is inspired by the witness-tree paradigm that was recently successful for computing decision trees [Komusiewicz et al., ICML 2023], whose extension to BDDs was open. We extend our algorithmic results to the case where we allow a small number of misclassified data points and complement them with lower bounds that show that the running times are tight from multiple points of view. We show that our main algorithm holds practical promise by providing a proof-of-concept implementation.

Algorithms for learning decision trees often include heuristic local-search operations such as (1) adjusting the threshold of a cut or (2) also exchanging the feature of that cut. We study minimizing the number of classification errors by performing a fixed number of a single type of these operations. Although we discover that the corresponding problems are NP-complete in general, we provide a comprehensive parameterized-complexity analysis with the aim of determining those properties of the problems that explain the hardness and those that make the problems tractable. For instance, we show that the problems remain hard for a small number $d$ of features or small domain size $D$ but the combination of both yields fixed-parameter tractability. That is, the problems are solvable in $(D + 1)^{2d} \cdot |\mathcal{I}|^{O(1)}$ time, where $|\mathcal{I}|$ is the size of the input. We also provide a proof-of-concept implementation of this algorithm and report on empirical results.

A decision tree recursively splits a feature space R d and then assigns class labels based on the resulting partition. Decision trees have been part of the basic machine-learning toolkit for decades. A large body of work considers heuristic algorithms that compute a decision tree from training data, usually aiming to minimize in particular the size of the resulting tree. In contrast, little is known about the complexity of the underlying computational problem of computing a minimum-size tree for the given training data. We study this problem with respect to the number d of dimensions of the feature space R d , which contains n training examples. We show that it can be solved in O ( n 2 d + 1 ) time, but under reasonable complexity-theoretic assumptions it is not possible to achieve f ( d ) ⋅ n o ( d / log ⁡ d ) running time. The problem is solvable in ( d R ) O ( d R ) ⋅ n 1 + o ( 1 ) time if there are exactly two classes and R is an upper bound on the number of tree leaves labeled with the first class.

Clustering a graph when the clusters can overlap can be seen from three different angles: We may look for cliques that cover the edges of the graph with bounded overlap, we may look to add or delete few edges to uncover the cluster structure, or we may split vertices to separate the clusters from each other. Splitting a vertex v means to remove it and to add two new copies of v and to make each previous neighbor of v adjacent with at least one of the copies. In this work, we study underlying computational problems regarding the three angles to overlapping clusterings, in particular when the overlap is small. We show that the above-mentioned covering problem is NP -complete. We then make structural observations that show that the covering viewpoint and the vertex-splitting viewpoint are equivalent, yielding NP-hardness for the vertex-splitting problem. On the positive side, we show that splitting at most k vertices to obtain a cluster graph has a problem kernel with O ( k ) vertices. Finally, we observe that combining our hardness results with structural observations and a so-called critical-clique lemma yields a simple alternative NP-hardness proof for the Cluster Editing With Vertex Splitting problem, where we add or delete edges and split vertices to obtain a cluster graph.

Given a graph G =( V,E ) and an integer k , the Cluster Editing problem asks whether we can transform G into a union of vertex-disjoint cliques by at most k modifications (edge deletions or insertions). In this paper, we study the following variant of Cluster Editing . We are given a graph G = ( V,E ), a packing ℋ of modification-disjoint induced P 3 s (no pair of P 3 s in ℋ share an edge or non-edge) and an integer ℓ. The task is to decide whether G can be transformed into a union of vertex-disjoint cliques by at most ℓ +|ℋ| modifications (edge deletions or insertions). We show that this problem is NP-hard even when ℓ = 0 (in which case the problem asks to turn G into a disjoint union of cliques by performing exactly one edge deletion or insertion per element of ℋ) and when each vertex is in at most 23 P 3 s of the packing. This answers negatively a question of van Bevern, Froese, and Komusiewicz (CSR 2016, ToCS 2018), repeated by C. Komusiewicz at Shonan meeting no. 144 in March 2019. We then initiate the study to find the largest integer c such that the problem remains tractable when restricting to packings such that each vertex is in at most c packed P 3 s. Here packed P 3 s are those belonging to the packing ℋ. Van Bevern et al. showed that the case c = 1 is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to ℓ and we show that the case c = 2 is solvable in | V | 2ℓ + O (1) time.

In many applications, we want to influence the decisions of independent agents by designing incentives for their actions. We revisit a fundamental problem in this area, called GAME IMPLEMENTATION: Given a game in standard form and a set of desired strategies, can we design a set of payment promises such that if the players take the payment promises into account, then all undominated strategies are desired? Furthermore, we aim to minimize the cost, that is, the worst-case amount of payments. We study the tractability of computing such payment promises and determine more closely what obstructions we may have to overcome in doing so. We show that GAME IMPLEMENTATION is NP-hard even for two players, solving in particular a long-standing open question and suggesting more restrictions are necessary to obtain tractability results. We thus study the regime in which players have only a small constant number of strategies and obtain the following. First, this case remains NP-hard even if each player’s utility depends only on three others. Second, we repair a flawed efficient algorithm for the case of both small number of strategies and small number of players. Among further results, we characterize sets of desired strategies that can be implemented at zero cost as a generalization of Nash equilibria.

A decision tree recursively splits a feature space \mathbb{R}^d and then assigns class labels based on the resulting partition. Decision trees have been part of the basic machine-learning toolkit for decades. A large body of work considers heuristic algorithms that compute a decision tree from training data, usually aiming to minimize in particular the size of the resulting tree. In contrast, little is known about the complexity of the underlying computational problem of computing a minimum-size tree for the given training data. We study this problem with respect to the number d of dimensions of the feature space \mathbb{R}^d, which contains n training examples. We show that it can be solved in O(n^(2d + 1)) time, but under reasonable complexity-theoretic assumptions it is not possible to achieve f(d) * n^o(d / log d) running time. The problem is solvable in (dR)^O(dR) * n^(1+o(1)) time, if there are exactly two classes and R is an upper bound on the number of tree leaves labeled with the first class.

Random forests and, more generally, (decision-)tree ensembles are widely used methods for classification and regression. Recent algorithmic advances allow to compute decision trees that are optimal for various measures such as their size or depth. We are not aware of such research for tree ensembles and aim to contribute to this area. Mainly, we provide two novel algorithms and corresponding lower bounds. First, we are able to carry over and substantially improve on tractability results for decision trees, obtaining a $(6\delta D S)^S \cdot \mathrm{poly}$-time algorithm, where $S$ is the number of cuts in the tree ensemble, $D$ the largest domain size, and $\delta$ is the largest number of features in which two examples differ. To achieve this, we introduce the witness-tree technique which also seems promising for practice. Second, we show that dynamic programming, which has been successful for decision trees, may also be viable for tree ensembles, providing an $\ell^n \cdot \mathrm{poly}$-time algorithm, where $\ell$ is the number of trees and $n$ the number of examples. Finally, we compare the number of cuts necessary to classify training data sets for decision trees and tree ensembles, showing that ensembles may need exponentially fewer cuts for increasing number of trees.

We show fixed-parameter tractability of the DIRECTED MULTICUT problem with three terminal pairs (with a randomized algorithm). In this problem we are given a directed graph G, three pairs of vertices (called terminals) (s1, t1), (s2, t2), (s3, t3), and an integer k and we want to find a set of at most k non-terminal vertices in G that intersect all s1t1-paths, all s2t2-paths, and all s3t3-paths. The parameterized complexity of this problem has been open since Chitnis, Hajiaghayi, and Marx proved fixed-parameter tractability of the two-terminal-pairs case at SODA 2012, and Pilipczuk and Wahlström proved the W[1]-hardness of the four-terminal-pairs case at SODA 2016. On the technical side, we use two recent developments in parameterized algorithms. Using the technique of directed flow-augmentation [Kim, Kratsch, Pilipczuk, Wahlström, STOC 2022] we cast the problem as a CSP problem with few variables and constraints over a large ordered domain. We observe that this problem can be in turn encoded as an FO model-checking task over a structure consisting of a few 0-1 matrices. We look at this problem through the lenses of twin-width, a recently introduced structural parameter [Bonnet, Kim, Thomassé, Watrigant, FOCS 2020]: By a recent characterization [Bonnet, Giocanti, Ossona de Mendez, Simon, Thomassé, Toruńczyk, STOC 2022] the said FO model-checking task can be done in FPT time if the said matrices have bounded grid rank. To complete the proof, we show an irrelevant vertex rule: If any of the matrices in the said encoding has a large grid minor, a vertex corresponding to the “middle” box in the grid minor can be proclaimed irrelevant — not contained in the sought solution — and thus reduced. * The full version of the paper can be accessed at https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.07425. The research leading to the results presented in this paper was partially carried out during the Parameterized Algorithms Retreat of the University of Warsaw, PARUW 2022, held in Bedlewo in April 2022. This research is a part of projects that have received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme Grant Agreement 714704 (TM, MP) and 648527 (MH), from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (MS), from the Research Council of Norway (LJ), and by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and by a fellowship within the IFI programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). (MH).

Abstract The notion offorbidden-transition graphsallows for a robust generalization of walks in graphs. In a forbidden-transition graph, every pair of edges incident to a common vertex ispermittedorforbidden; a walk iscompatibleif all pairs of consecutive edges on the walk are permitted. Forbidden-transition graphs and related models have found applications in a variety of fields, such as routing in optical telecommunication networks, road networks, and bio-informatics. A widely-studied special case are edge-colored graphs, where a compatible walk is forbidden to take two edges of the same color in a row. We initiate the study of fundamental problems on finding paths, cycles and walks in forbidden-transition graphs from the point of view of parameterized complexity, including an in-depth study of tractability with regards to various graph-width parameters. Among several results, we prove that finding a simple compatible path between given endpoints in a forbidden-transition graph isW[1]-hard when parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to a linear forest (so it is also hard when parameterized by pathwidth or treewidth). On the other hand, we show an algebraic trick that yields tractability when parameterized by treewidth for finding a compatible Hamiltonian cycle in the edge-colored graph setting.

Bounded expansion and nowhere-dense classes of graphs capture the theoretical tractability for several important algorithmic problems. These classes of graphs can be characterized by the so-called weak coloring numbers of graphs, which generalize the well-known graph invariant degeneracy (also called k-core number). Being NP-hard, weak-coloring numbers were previously computed on real-world graphs mainly via incremental heuristics. We study whether it is feasible to augment such heuristics with exponential-time subprocedures that kick in when a desired upper bound on the weak coloring number is breached. We provide hardness and tractability results on the corresponding computational subproblems. We implemented several of the resulting algorithms and show them to be competitive with previous approaches on a previously studied set of benchmark instances containing 86 graphs with up to 183831 edges. We obtain improved weak coloring numbers for over half of the instances.

Treewidth and hypertree width have proven to be highly successful structural parameters in the context of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). When either of these parameters is bounded by a constant, then CSP becomes solvable in polynomial time. However, here the order of the polynomial in the running time depends on the width, and this is known to be unavoidable; therefore, the problem is not fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by either of these width measures. Here we introduce an enhancement of tree and hypertree width through a novel notion of thresholds, allowing the associated decompositions to take into account information about the computational costs associated with solving the given CSP instance. Aside from introducing these notions, we obtain efficient theoretical as well as empirical algorithms for computing threshold treewidth and hypertree width and show that these parameters give rise to fixed-parameter algorithms for CSP as well as other, more general problems. We complement our theoretical results with experimental evaluations in terms of heuristics as well as exact methods based on SAT/SMT encodings.

The Directed Grid Theorem, stating that there is a function $f$ such that a directed graph of directed treewidth at least $f(k)$ contains a directed grid of size at least $k$ as a butterfly minor, after being a conjecture for nearly 20 years, was proved in 2015 by Kawarabayashi and Kreutzer. However, the function $f$ obtained in the proof is very fast growing. In this work, we show that if one relaxes directed grid to bramble of constant congestion, one can obtain a polynomial bound. More precisely, we show that for every $k \geq 1$ there exists $t = \mathcal{O}(k^{48} \log^{13} k)$ such that every directed graph of directed treewidth at least $t$ contains a bramble of congestion at most 8 and size at least $k$.

We study generalizations of stable matching in which agents may be matched fractionally; this models time-sharing assignments. We focus on the so-called ordinal stability and cardinal stability, and investigate the computational complexity of finding an ordinally stable or cardinally stable fractional matching which either maximizes the social welfare (i.e., the overall utilities of the agents) or the number of fully matched agents (i.e., agents whose matching values sum up to one). We complete the complexity classification of both optimization problems for both ordinal stability and cardinal stability, distinguishing between the marriage (bipartite) and roommates (non-bipartite) cases and the presence or absence of ties in the preferences. In particular, we prove a surprising result that finding a cardinally stable fractional matching with maximum social welfare is NP-hard even for the marriage case without ties. This answers an open question and exemplifies a rare variant of stable marriage that remains hard for preferences without ties. We also complete the picture of the relations of the stability notions and derive structural properties.

We present a data structure that in a dynamic graph of treedepth at most d, which is modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, maintains an optimum-height elimination forest. The data structure achieves worst-case update time , which matches the best known parameter dependency in the running time of a static fpt algorithm for computing the treedepth of a graph. This improves a result of Dvořák et al. [ESA 2014], who for the same problem achieved update time f(d) for some non-elementary (i.e. tower-exponential) function f. As a by-product, we improve known upper bounds on the sizes of minimal obstructions for having treedepth d from doubly-exponential in d to dO(d). As applications, we design new fully dynamic parameterized data structures for detecting long paths and cycles in general graphs. More precisely, for a fixed parameter k and a dynamic graph G, modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, our data structures maintain answers to the following queries: Does G contain a simple path on k vertices? Does G contain a simple cycle on at least k vertices? In the first case, the data structure achieves amortized update time . In the second case, the amortized update time is . In both cases we assume access to a dictionary on the edges of G.

Given two disjoint sets W1 and W2 of points in the plane, the Optimal Discretization problem asks for the minimum size of a family of horizontal and vertical lines that separate W1 from W2, that is, in every region into which the lines partition the plane there are either only points of W1, or only points of W2, or the region is empty. Equivalently, Optimal Discretization can be phrased as a task of discretizing continuous variables: We would like to discretize the range of x-coordinates and the range of y-coordinates into as few segments as possible, maintaining that no pair of points from W1 × W2 are projected onto the same pair of segments under this discretization. We provide a fixed-parameter algorithm for the problem, parameterized by the number of lines in the solution. Our algorithm works in time , where k is the bound on the number of lines to find and n is the number of points in the input. Our result answers in positive a question of Bonnet, Giannopolous, and Lampis [IPEC 2017] and of Froese (PhD thesis, 2018) and is in contrast with the known intractability of two closely related generalizations: the Rectangle Stabbing problem and the generalization in which the selected lines are not required to be axis-parallel.

Given a graph G = (V,E) and an integer k, the Cluster Editing problem asks whether we can transform G into a union of vertex-disjoint cliques by at most k modifications (edge deletions or insertions). In this paper, we study the following variant of Cluster Editing. We are given a graph G = (V,E), a packing ℋ of modification-disjoint induced P₃s (no pair of P₃s in H share an edge or non-edge) and an integer 𝓁. The task is to decide whether G can be transformed into a union of vertex-disjoint cliques by at most 𝓁+|H| modifications (edge deletions or insertions). We show that this problem is NP-hard even when 𝓁 = 0 (in which case the problem asks to turn G into a disjoint union of cliques by performing exactly one edge deletion or insertion per element of H) and when each vertex is in at most 23 P₃s of the packing. This answers negatively a question of van Bevern, Froese, and Komusiewicz (CSR 2016, ToCS 2018), repeated by C. Komusiewicz at Shonan meeting no. 144 in March 2019. We then initiate the study to find the largest integer c such that the problem remains tractable when restricting to packings such that each vertex is in at most c packed P₃s. Van Bevern et al. showed that the case c = 1 is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to 𝓁 and we show that the case c = 2 is solvable in |V|^{2𝓁 + O(1)} time.

Treewidth and hypertree width have proven to be highly successful structural parameters in the context of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). When either of these parameters is bounded by a constant, then CSP becomes solvable in polynomial time. However, here the order of the polynomial in the running time depends on the width, and this is known to be unavoidable; therefore, the problem is not fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by either of these width measures. Here we introduce an enhancement of tree and hypertree width through a novel notion of thresholds, allowing the associated decompositions to take into account information about the computational costs associated with solving the given CSP instance. Aside from introducing these notions, we obtain efficient theoretical as well as empirical algorithms for computing threshold treewidth and hypertree width and show that these parameters give rise to fixed-parameter algorithms for CSP as well as other, more general problems. We complement our theoretical results with experimental evaluations in terms of heuristics as well as exact methods based on SAT/SMT encodings.

The notion of forbidden-transition graphs allows for a robust generalization of walks in graphs. In a forbidden-transition graph, every pair of edges incident to a common vertex is permitted or forbidden; a walk is compatible if all pairs of consecutive edges on the walk are permitted. Forbidden-transition graphs and related models have found applications in a variety of fields, such as routing in optical telecommunication networks, road networks, and bio-informatics. We initiate the study of fundamental connectivity problems from the point of view of parameterized complexity, including an in-depth study of tractability with regards to various graph-width parameters. Among several results, we prove that finding a simple compatible path between given endpoints in a forbidden-transition graph is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to a linear forest (so it is also hard when parameterized by pathwidth or treewidth). On the other hand, we show an algebraic trick that yields tractability when parameterized by treewidth of finding a properly colored Hamiltonian cycle in an edge-colored graph; properly colored walks in edge-colored graphs is one of the most studied special cases of compatible walks in forbidden-transition graphs.

Publikacja bezkosztowa

A fundamental graph problem is to recognize whether the vertex set of a graph $G$ can be bipartitioned into sets $A$ and $B$ such that $G[A]$ and $G[B]$ satisfy properties $\Pi_A$ and $\Pi_B$, respectively. This so-called $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition problem generalizes, amongst others, the recognition of 3-colorable, bipartite, split, and monopolar graphs. In this paper, we study whether certain fixed-parameter tractable $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition problems admit polynomial kernels. In our study, we focus on the first level above triviality, where $\Pi_A$ is the set of $P_3$-free graphs (disjoint unions of cliques, or cluster graphs), the parameter is the number of clusters in the cluster graph $G[A]$, and $\Pi_B$ is characterized by a set $\mathcal{H}$ of connected forbidden induced subgraphs. We prove that, under the assumption that ${NP} \not\subseteq {coNP}/{poly}$, $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition admits a polynomial kernel if and only if $\mathcal{H}$ contains a graph with at most two vertices. In both the kernelization and the lower bound results, we exploit the properties of a pushing process, which is an algorithmic technique used recently by Heggerness et al. and by Kanj et al. to obtain fixed-parameter algorithms for many cases of $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition, as well as several other problems.

In this paper we consider the $p$-Norm Hamming Centroid problem which asks to determine whether some given binary strings have a centroid with a bound on the $p$-norm of its Hamming distances to the strings. Specifically, given a set of strings $S$ and a real $k$, we consider the problem of determining whether there exists a string $s^*$ with $\big(\sum_{s \in S}d^p(s^*,s)\big)^{1/p} \leq k$, where $d(,)$ denotes the Hamming distance metric. This problem has important applications in data clustering, and is a generalization of the well-known polynomial-time solvable \textsc{Consensus String} $(p=1)$ problem, as well as the NP-hard \textsc{Closest String} $(p=\infty)$ problem. Our main result shows that the problem is NP-hard for all fixed rational $p > 1$, closing the gap for all rational values of $p$ between $1$ and $\infty$. Under standard complexity assumptions the reduction also implies that the problem has no $2^{o(n+m)}$-time or $2^{o(k^{\frac{p}{(p+1)}})}$-time algorithm, where $m$ denotes the number of input strings and $n$ denotes the length of each string, for any fixed $p > 1$. Both running time lower bounds are tight. In particular, we provide a $2^{k^{\frac{p}{(p+1)}+\varepsilon}}$-time algorithm for each fixed $\varepsilon > 0$. In the last part of the paper, we complement our hardness result by presenting a fixed-parameter algorithm and a factor-$2$ approximation algorithm for the problem.

The celebrated Erdős-Pósa theorem states that every undirected graph that does not admit a family of k vertex-disjoint cycles contains a feedback vertex set (a set of vertices hitting all cycles in the graph) of size O(k log k). After being known for long as Younger’s conjecture, a similar statement for directed graphs has been proven in 1996 by Reed, Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas. However, in their proof, the dependency of the size of the feedback vertex set on the size of vertex-disjoint cycle packing is not elementary. We show that if we compare the size of a minimum feedback vertex set in a directed graph with quarter-integral cycle packing number, we obtain a polynomial bound. More precisely, we show that if in a directed graph G there is no family of k cycles such that every vertex of G is in at most four of the cycles, then there exists a feedback vertex set in G of size O(k^4). On the way there we prove a more general result about quarter-integral packing of subgraphs of high directed treewidth: for every pair of positive integers a and b, if a directed graph G has directed treewidth Omega(a^6 b^8 log^2(ab)), then one can find in G a family of a subgraphs, each of directed treewidth at least b, such that every vertex of G is in at most four subgraphs.

The classic Stable Roommates problem (the non-bipartite generalization of the well-known Stable Marriage problem) asks whether there is a stable matching for a given set of agents, i.e. a partitioning of the agents into disjoint pairs such that no two agents induce a blocking pair. Herein, each agent has a preference list denoting who it prefers to have as a partner, and two agents are blocking if they prefer to be with each other rather than with their assigned partners. Since stable matchings may not be unique, we study an NP-hard optimization variant of Stable Roommates, called Egal Stable Roommates, which seeks to find a stable matching with a minimum egalitarian cost gamma, i.e. the sum of the dissatisfaction of the agents is minimum. The dissatisfaction of an agent is the number of agents that this agent prefers over its partner if it is matched; otherwise it is the length of its preference list. We also study almost stable matchings, called Min-Block-Pair Stable Roommates, which seeks to find a matching with a minimum number beta of blocking pairs. Our main result is that Egal Stable Roommates parameterized by gamma is fixed-parameter tractable, while Min-Block-Pair Stable Roommates parameterized by beta is W[1]-hard, even if the length of each preference list is at most five.

Motivated by the recent rapid growth of research for algorithms to cluster multi-layer and temporal graphs, we study extensions of the classical Cluster Editing problem. In Multi-Layer Cluster Editing we receive a set of graphs on the same vertex set, called layers and aim to transform all layers into cluster graphs (disjoint unions of cliques) that differ only slightly. More specifically, we want to mark at most d vertices and to transform each layer into a cluster graph using at most k edge additions or deletions per layer so that, if we remove the marked vertices, we obtain the same cluster graph in all layers. In Temporal Cluster Editing we receive a sequence of layers and we want to transform each layer into a cluster graph so that consecutive layers differ only slightly. That is, we want to transform each layer into a cluster graph with at most k edge additions or deletions and to mark a distinct set of d vertices in each layer so that each two consecutive layers are the same after removing the vertices marked in the first of the two layers. We study the combinatorial structure of the two problems via their parameterized complexity with respect to the parameters d and k, among others. Despite the similar definition, the two problems behave quite differently: In particular, Multi-Layer Cluster Editing is fixed-parameter tractable with running time k^{O(k + d)} s^{O(1)} for inputs of size s, whereas Temporal Cluster Editing is W[1]-hard with respect to k even if d = 3.

We prove that any polynomial‐time ‐approximation algorithm for then‐vertex metric asymmetric Traveling Salesperson Problem yields a polynomial‐time ‐approximation algorithm for the mixed and windy Capacitated Arc Routing Problem, where is the number of weakly connected components in the subgraph induced by the positive‐demand arcs—a small number in many applications. In conjunction with known results, we obtain constant‐factor approximations for and ‐approximations in general. Experiments show that our algorithm, together with several heuristic enhancements, outperforms many previous polynomial‐time heuristics. Finally, since the solution quality achievable in polynomial time appears to mainly depend onCand sinceC = 1 in almost all benchmark instances, we propose the Ob benchmark set, simulating cities that are divided into several components by a river. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, Vol. 70(3), 262–278 2017

Dynamics of interactions play an increasingly important role in the analysis of complex networks. A modeling framework to capture this are temporal graphs. We focus on enumerating Δ-cliques, an extension of the concept of cliques to temporal graphs: for a given time period Δ, a Δ-clique in a temporal graph is a set of vertices and a time interval such that all vertices interact with each other at least after every Δ time steps within the time interval. Viard, Latapy, and Magnien [ASONAM 2015] proposed a greedy algorithm for enumerating all maximal Δ-cliques in temporal graphs. In contrast to this approach, we adapt to the temporal setting the Bron-Kerbosch algorithm - an efficient, recursive backtracking algorithm which enumerates all maximal cliques in static graphs. We obtain encouraging results both in theory (concerning worst-case time analysis based on the parameter “Δ-slice degeneracy” of the underlying graph) as well as in practice with experiments on real-world data. The latter culminates in a significant improvement for most interesting Δ-values concerning running time in comparison with the algorithm of Viard, Latapy, and Magnien (typically two orders of magnitude).

The h-index is an important bibliographic measure used to assess the performance of researchers. Van Bevern et al. [Artif. Intel., to appear] showed that, despite computational worst-case hardness results, substantial manipulation of the h-index of Google Scholar author profiles is possible by merging articles. Complementing this work, we study the opposite operation, the splitting of articles, which is arguably the more natural operation for manipulation and which is also allowed within Google Scholar. We present numerous results on computational complexity (from linear-time algorithms to parameterized computational hardness results) and empirically indicate that at least small improvements of the h-index by splitting merged articles are easily achievable.

Finding a vertex subset in a graph that satisfies a certain property is one of the most-studied topics in algorithmic graph theory. The focus herein is often on minimizing or maximizing the size of the solution, that is, the size of the desired vertex set. In several applications, however, we also want to limit the "exposure" of the solution to the rest of the graph. This is the case, for example, when the solution represents persons that ought to deal with sensitive information or a segregated community. In this work, we thus explore the (parameterized) complexity of finding such secluded vertex subsets for a wide variety of properties that they shall fulfill. More precisely, we study the constraint that the (open or closed) neighborhood of the solution shall be bounded by a parameter and the influence of this constraint on the complexity of minimizing separators, feedback vertex sets, F-free vertex deletion sets, dominating sets, and the maximization of independent sets.

We show that any alpha(n)-approximation algorithm for the n-vertex metric asymmetric Traveling Salesperson problem yields O(alpha(C))-approximation algorithms for various mixed, windy, and capacitated arc routing problems. Herein, C is the number of weakly-connected components in the subgraph induced by the positive-demand arcs, a number that can be expected to be small in applications. In conjunction with known results, we derive constant-factor approximations if C is in O(log n) and O(log(C)/log(log(C)))-approximations in general.

We study the NP-complete Minimum Shared Edges (MSE) problem. Given an undirected graph, a source and a sink vertex, and two integers p and k, the question is whether there are p paths in the graph connecting the source with the sink and sharing at most k edges. Herein, an edge is shared if it appears in at least two paths. We show that MSE is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph and the number k of shared edges combined. We show that MSE is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to p, but does not admit a polynomial-size kernel (unless NP is a subset of coNP/poly). In the proof of the fixed-parameter tractability of MSE parameterized by p, we employ the treewidth reduction technique due to Marx, O'Sullivan, and Razgon [ACM TALG 2013].

In the Vector Connectivity problem we are given an undirected graph G=(V,E), a demand function phi: V => {0,...,d}, and an integer k. The question is whether there exists a set S of at most k vertices such that every vertex v in V\S has at least phi(v) vertex-disjoint paths to S; this abstractly captures questions about placing servers in a network, or warehouses on a map, relative to demands. The problem is NP-hard already for instances with d=4 (Cicalese et al., Theor. Comput. Sci. 2015), admits a log-factor approximation (Boros et al., Networks 2014), and is fixed-parameter tractable in terms of k (Lokshtanov, unpublished 2014). We prove several results regarding kernelization and approximation for Vector Connectivity and the variant Vector d-Connectivity where the upper bound d on demands is a constant. For Vector d-Connectivity we give a factor d-approximation algorithm and construct a vertex-linear kernelization, i.e., an efficient reduction to an equivalent instance with f(d)k=O(k) vertices. For Vector Connectivity we get a factor opt-approximation and we show that it has no kernelization to size polynomial in k+d unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly, making f(d)\poly(k) optimal for Vector d-Connectivity. Finally, we provide a write-up for fixed-parameter tractability of Vector Connectivity(k) by giving a different algorithm based on matroid intersection.

The NP-hard Subset Interconnection Design problem, also known as Minimum Topic-Connected Overlay, is motivated by numerous applications including the design of scalable overlay networks and vacuum systems. It has as input a finite set $V$ and a collection of subsets $V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_m \subseteq V$, and asks for a minimum-cardinality edge set $E$ such that for the graph $G=(V,E)$ all induced subgraphs $G[V_1], G[V_2], \ldots, G[V_m]$ are connected. We study Subset Interconnection Design in the context of polynomial-time data reduction rules that preserve the possibility of constructing optimal solutions. Our contribution is threefold: First, we show the incorrectness of earlier polynomial-time data reduction rules. Second, we show linear-time solvability in case of a constant number $m$ of subsets, implying fixed-parameter tractability for the parameter $m$. Third, we provide a fixed-parameter tractability result for small subset sizes and tree-like output graphs. To achieve our results, we elaborate on polynomial-time data reduction rules which also may be of practical use in solving Subset Interconnection Design.